2021-05-11 PPS School Board Regular Meeting
District | Portland Public Schools |
---|---|
Date | 2021-05-11 |
Time | 18:00:00 |
Venue | Virtual/Online |
Meeting Type | regular |
Directors Present | missing |
Documents / Media
Notices/Agendas
Materials
Resolution 6302 - to Recognize May 2021 as National Mental Health Awareness Month - As proposed for consideration (e03a275e3bbb9185).pdf Resolution 6302 - to Recognize May 2021 as National Mental Health Awareness Month - As proposed for consideration
Resolution 6291 - Resolution Authorizing Amendment to the Bond Accountability Committee Charter - As proposed for consideration (54b0060ba667643b).pdf Resolution 6291 - Resolution Authorizing Amendment to the Bond Accountability Committee Charter - As proposed for consideration
Revised BAC Charter 4 30 21 (059409b6f609da79).pdf Revised BAC Charter 4_30_21
RESOLUTION 6296 - to adopt the Index to the minutes - As proposed for consideration (2c886108c0a4971b).pdf RESOLUTION 6296 - to adopt the Index to the minutes - As proposed for consideration
2021 04 27 Index to the Minutes Draft for approval (ef3fd6b394526c97).pdf 2021_04_27_Index to the Minutes_Draft for approval
Resolution 6297 Expenditure Contracts As proposed for consideration (3af8e68dd5062805).pdf Resolution 6297 Expenditure Contracts As proposed for consideration
STAFF REPORT - STA CONTRACT - DRAFT - 04 23 2021 (89780c694a592daf).pdf STAFF REPORT - STA CONTRACT - DRAFT - 04 23 2021
Personal Services Contracts on Board Agenda 051121 (1fc8f76b4113bcc9).pdf Personal Services Contracts on Board Agenda 051121
Revised - Resolution 6298 Board of Education and Superintendent Staff Expectations and Operating Protocols - As proposed for consideration (ba8929e56a00b98e).pdf Revised - Resolution 6298 Board of Education and Superintendent Staff Expectations and Operating Protocols - As proposed for consideration
Resolution 6298 - Board of Education and Superintendent Staff Expectations and Operating Protocols - As proposed for consideration (4e3829f4c573133f).pdf Resolution 6298 - Board of Education and Superintendent Staff Expectations and Operating Protocols - As proposed for consideration
Resolution 6299 - Ethics and Conflicts of Interest Training and Compliance Statement - As proposed for consideration (3262f146a1da7a09).pdf Resolution 6299 - Ethics and Conflicts of Interest Training and Compliance Statement - As proposed for consideration
Resolution 6300 - Board Leadership Elections (b3cce3d698012d5b).pdf Resolution 6300 - Board Leadership Elections
Fall Reopen Update presentation May11 (8f54e14f3cb959e6).pdf Fall Reopen Update presentation May11
Reopening Resolution 5-11-21 Final2 (5eb3a470d563a6fd).pdf Reopening Resolution 5-11-21 Final2
Abbreviated Pension Obligation Bonds (POB) Presentation (by Piper Sandler) May 2021 (225f0b6a3863fa9b).pdf Abbreviated Pension Obligation Bonds (POB) Presentation (by Piper Sandler) May 2021
Resolution 6301 - Resolution Authorizing Pension Bonds and Related Matters - as proposed for consideration (e26f0715371fcef6).pdf Resolution 6301 - Resolution Authorizing Pension Bonds and Related Matters - as proposed for consideration
Staff Report - Pension Bonds and Related Matters (dd7882eb712d4539).pdf Staff Report - Pension Bonds and Related Matters
Pension Obligation Bonds (POB) Presentation (by Piper Sandler) May 2021 (430a856f229f900d).pdf Pension Obligation Bonds (POB) Presentation (by Piper Sandler) May 2021
SEGC Phase 2 Timeline & Overview 5 11 21 (b2a8b5950e8de372).pdf SEGC Phase 2 Timeline & Overview 5_11_21
SEGC Phase 2 scope staff report (9e4a1d150d395a69).pdf SEGC Phase 2 scope staff report
20210414 - SEGC Phase 2 Charge (ba79d0e5cfee0501).pdf 20210414 - SEGC Phase 2 Charge
Phase 2 community engagement overview and timeline (361b633d25b09867).pdf Phase 2 community engagement overview and timeline
PPS SE Guiding Coalition - Phase 1 Implementation Map - 20210503 (ae14117a72d6904d).pdf PPS SE Guiding Coalition - Phase 1 Implementation Map - 20210503
PPS SE Guiding Coalition - Phase 2 Baseline Summary Stats (054a6f5f037d3cd3).pdf PPS SE Guiding Coalition - Phase 2 Baseline Summary Stats
PPS SE Guiding Coalition - SE Middle School Capacity Socioeconomics - 20210503 (353ae0d025048a45).pdf PPS SE Guiding Coalition - SE Middle School Capacity Socioeconomics - 20210503
PPS District Map 11x17 (b7d048815be6aa01).pdf PPS_District_Map_11x17
SEGC Phase 2 Schools Worksheet (8bdb6000d5513761).pdf SEGC Phase 2 Schools Worksheet
SEGC Phase 2 Scope Options (d6cdb7fba6ce647b).pdf SEGC Phase 2 Scope Options
2020-2021 CBRC Local Option Levy Review (766724ff58085acf).pdf 2020/2021 CBRC Local Option Levy Review
2020-2021 CBRC Budget Review 5-9-21 (679dc6f8cfb02684).pdf 2020/2021 CBRC Budget Review 5/9/21
FY21-22 Proposed Budget M98 SIA Title (1) (6a8d630edaa9273d).pdf FY21-22 Proposed Budget_M98_SIA_Title (1)
FY22 Proposed Budget Key Investment Pivot Table (7cff4974b44cd0ab).pdf FY22 Proposed Budget Key Investment Pivot Table
FY2021-22 Budget Wonderings... (Responses) - Budget Q & A (4c69040138b58c79).pdf FY2021-22 Budget Wonderings... (Responses) - Budget Q & A
May 11th FY21-22 Proposed Budget (ac81248059d825ad).pdf May 11th_FY21-22 Proposed Budget
Minutes
Transcripts
Event 1: PS Board of Education Regular Meeting - 5/11/2021
00h 00m 00s
so we were meeting there and ran a
little long
but this board meeting of the board of
education for may 11
2021 is called to order for tonight's
meeting any item that will be voted on
has been posted on the pbs website under
the board and meetings tabs
this meeting is being streamed live on
pbs tv services website
and on channel 28 and will be replayed
throughout the next two weeks
please check the district website for
replay time
ahead of us tonight on our agenda we
have a great deal of work
much of it exciting as we look to fall
and as we look at our financial health
as we celebrate
our amazing staff there's a lot going on
but we would like to begin with a
resolution to recognize may
2021 as national mental health awareness
month
um superintendent guerrero would you
like to introduce this first item
thank you chair yes um would be very
happy to
have chief martineck of student support
services and members of our team
tell you a little bit about why this is
an important month
brenda thank you
uh directors and superintendent uh
in our community that's watching
i want to thank you very much for
honoring may as mental health awareness
month
i thought it would be best to hear from
james loveland who is our senior
director for
student success and health department
tonight he's really been leading the
charge
during the pandemic uh around the sia
dollars of increasing counselors and
social workers
and so i will turn uh the next few
minutes over to him
thank you so much brenda good evening
directors superintendent guerrero and
the pbs community
i want to thank the school board and the
superintendent for recognizing me as
mental health awareness month
as as all educators know every every
month is mental health awareness month
in particular over the last year as our
school district has
strived to continuously reimagine and
provide services to students and
families in innovative ways
many departments across bps are engaged
in uplifting the mental wellness of our
students
as the senior director of the department
of student success and health i'm
honored to share a brief overview
of the amazing work that our department
in collaboration with many across the
district and city
do to help support and uplift the
overall wellness of students
in the district the department of
student success and health
coordinates and supports a wide range of
services that include our critical and
valued relationships with community
partners
supporting the work of the district's
amazing counselors social workers and
comprehensive school psychologists
provision of culturally specific mental
health and substance use supports
title ix resources and services
supporting pps communities with crisis
recovery ensuring mental
and sharing mental health and substance
use resources on numerous platforms for
students families and staff
including the newly developed youth
resource app
that's available on apple and android
for apple android users
you can download it now everyone has
experienced the last year differently
and many people in our community
continue to experience the impact of
physical
economic mental spiritual and racial
stressors
it's important for us to acknowledge
that our communities of color
have been disproportionately negatively
impacted by system inequities
during the global pandemic and these are
often the same communities that are have
already been disproportionately impacted
by structural violence and
systemic oppression we acknowledge that
the continuing community violence in
portland is disproportionately impacting
current
and former portland public schools
families and students of color
in an effort to intentionally respond
and provide space for students of color
to feel seen heard and valued
pps staff host weekly district-wide
crisis recovery groups for black
students
as well as native wellness groups
student success and health as well as
other departments have established or
maintained contracts with culturally
specific community-based organizations
focused on mental wellness and identity
celebration
including but not limited to ground girl
rise coalition of black men
nara and horizon counseling amongst
others
over the next several weeks we will be
sharing resources and information that
will highlight
partnerships and this course that pps
offers for students and families in
support of mental illness
this will include information about
where students and families and staff
can find
connect to a wide range of mental health
and substance use supports
an update on the real initiative and
links and materials for our educators
social workers psychologists and
counselors to support and uplift
students and families as summer
approaches with that i turn it to chair
lowry
thank you so much mr loveland and chief
martin nick
directors and do i have a motion and
00h 05m 00s
second to adopt resolution 63302
resolution to recognize may
2021 as national mental health awareness
month
so moved second
director brim edwards moves and director
to pass seconds the adoption of
resolution 6302
is there any board discussion
just thank you um mr loveland for going
through all the specific work that pps
has
underway right now and just the
incredible
adaptation in this last year
and the great partnerships and um
you know we hear wonderful things from
our school communities and from our kids
about just the accessibility of
the supports so um
thank you all it's really hard work
thank you also for recognizing our
epidemic of violence right now and all
the ways that you guys have been
working with all of our different
partners in the community to support our
our kids and families who are really
suffering and grieving
i think this is important work at any
time but i think especially during this
pandemic we know that
um uh mental health awareness is is
really
very vital dr medwards did you have
something to add you know um
i think both you and director constance
have covered what i was going to say
just thank you
um to the all the teams in the schools
in the central office who are supporting
our
our kids and our families
ms bradshaw is there any public comment
no the board will now vote on resolution
6302
resolution to recognize may 2021 as
national mental health awareness month
all in favor please indicate by saying
yes
yes yes yes yes
all opposed please indicate by saying no
are there any abstentions
resolution 6302 is approved by a vote of
seven to zero with student
representative shu
voting yes all right thank you all
we turn now to our board consent agenda
board members if there are any items you
would like to pull we will set those
aside for discussion and vote after we
vote on the rest of the consent agenda
but first of all ms bradshaw are there
any changes to the consent agenda
no board members are there any items you
would like to pull from the consent
agenda
are you asking just for a separate vote
or we can still
have a discussion uh let's pull anything
we want to have a discussion on
if we want to make if it's just a
question that's fine but if we want to
amend language then we should probably
pull the item
yeah no no amendment of language okay
so you just have a question on something
julia no it's a statement
okay a request but anyone else want to
pull or amend language structure to pass
did you want to
pull in a min language or are you fine
with how things are
i'm fine with how things are thanks okay
great
okay uh all right
um so moved
do i have a second
oh okay so director bailey and director
scott
were ahead of me here and they uh
director bailey moved and director scott
seconded the adoption of the consent
agenda
is there any board discussion on the
consent agenda
yes go ahead julia
um i had a um
a couple things first i wanted to thank
dr
byrd for
the responsiveness on a question i had
around the
uva contract and the updated
goals and language that was put into the
scope so thank you for that
and then i um
let's see on the ethics statement
um first of all thank you uh chair lowry
for
being the driving force before getting
all these uh
items before us it seems um unceremonial
to do it in the consent agenda
with all the work that happened um so
thank you
in on the ethics statement that we're
going to sign i have a request
that when we we have the training
so we're going to be having training and
then signing an ethics and conflicts of
interest form and it references
that we're also pledging to adhere to
statutory requirements and district
policy is that
when we do that for uh returning and
also new board numbers that we have
sort of those policies earmarked so we
know what that's
00h 10m 00s
specifically is referencing and then
um i have a just
brief statement i'm also going to read
and also submit for the record
around the communications protocols
that's okay so in the
the document titled portland public
schools board and superintendent staff
expectations and
operating protocols there's covers a
whole host of different topics one of
them is communication
and there is some expectations
and agreements about how we're going to
communicate with each other
and i just want to the record and again
i'll submit this for the record but just
say that
the board protocols contemplate standard
and routine board communications about
district operations and decision making
there are infrequent instances however
when following the guidelines
could be contrary to the school
district's legal or fiscal interest or
contrary to the advice of the district
council
in my time on the board i've faced these
unique situations prior to this
prior to this current administration
including when a senior staff member for
instance asserted legal claims against
the district or when serious allegations
of misconduct against
senior district leader were made in
those situations i
expect i would not follow these
protocols when it is not in the
district's legal or fiscal
interests
thank you director bib edwards um i know
that this whole
um the entire board has worked very hard
to
look at our self-evaluation which we did
uh last summer
and work towards how do we follow best
practices how do we
shift culture to to be the school board
that will help
ensure the success of our board goals
which center
um underserved students and specifically
black and native students and so these
pieces of
adult outcomes of adult business really
do impact our students so thank you all
for all the time and work you've done
with our ethics statement with
our board leadership election process
and with our protocols director moore
did you have some
yes um i just wanted to make a brief
statement about the ethics
statement um i admit to being a little
disappointed
that the statement we ended up with
essentially just reiterates what is in
the state statute
and um it is disappointing to me because
i think
the the state ethical
statute is by many measures
a pretty minimalist standard
and i had hoped that we would
uh we would aspire to a higher a higher
standard
than than sort of minimal
and um i had offered some language
around specific issues that i think
are
if not common at least not unknown among
volunteer boards where most of the
members
have um professional positions
um and there can be
some overlap between the volunteer work
on this board
and a member's professional life
and i think i think it would be helpful
to have
um in writing some uh
some expectations around how any
potential conflicts
or even perceived conflicts
could be managed in a way that
um you know preserves the integrity
of the board process and um
and also protects members from any
uh any public perception that things
might not
might be awry so i had hoped that we
could include some language
in that um i was i was overruled in that
so i i am disappointed but um
i i fully expect um that
um this board will continue to maintain
the highest standards of
integrity and ethical behavior uh going
forward
thank you uh since you're not running
for re-election uh director moore
maybe now in your spare time you can
work with the state of oregon to shore
up their ethics standards
um so that we can all aspire to the
the high uh ethical standards which
which you would have us govern ourselves
i'm sure there's great appetite for that
so thank you
any further discussion on the consent
agenda
yeah i had a couple things um one is um
really appreciate this work on the
communications protocols
uh we've been talking about that for a
good three years i think we've made
00h 15m 00s
tremendous strides in our government
governance since 2018
so uh and that was something that was
really impo important to me
um so thank you for carrying on that
commitment uh rita and your tenure as
chair and haley and
really important um one question one
i guess comment that i had about the
consent agenda
was that i was um i was disappointed
in the the transportation contract um
it's not fair to
for me to vote against it because i
hadn't really looked at the language of
the rfp
and it's gone through a very complicated
process with the rfp
but um i i was looking really closely at
the guidelines around the procurement of
the buses
and i don't think we adequately
connected that to our climate justice
work and there's there's just one simple
clause in there that
says that um you know the the
pps believes in mitigating the effects
of climate change and so
if the contractor has some suggestions
about
substitutions we welcome that well
that's very different than
stating our values much more clearly
in the in the rfp itself and so
you know i felt myself for not being on
top of that
and and trying to have some influence on
the development of the rfp
and to really talk to staff and
leadership about that before
um but to the extent that we can
influence that
um once these were committed to these
contracts i'd really like to see it
um these are propane powered buses that
they'll be procuring with
our money which you know they go to
great pains to say
is a lot better than diesel well
diesel's not
our standard that we should be comparing
it to and we have i think one
electric vehicle paid for through um or
one electric bus
paid for through pge but i'd like to see
us get creative and figure out
whether we can find more grants or more
partnerships
that enable us to really change the
constitution of that fleet but
with the passage of this we lose our
leverage on that which i think is
unfortunate
and i'm disappointed um but
i hope that we'll we'll keep looking at
it and keep communicating
to our contracted partner and partners
that this is a value that we we take
very seriously and that we care a lot
about
so i have some misgivings but um
i will support this consent agenda with
that item
um i i want to piggyback on that i
appreciate your um
you know wanting to align our values
with our operational
what we're doing operationally and um to
the extent that we can we probably won't
be looking at this contract for another
eight years or ten years i think it is
um we try to move to electric as much as
possible and also ask the
require the contractor to maybe they
already do this but to look at routes
um that are that are that are gas saving
or you know that are
more efficient routes to the extent that
they can
to mitigate climate change i see that
some of our staff has teleported in
um deputy hurts um or ms wesling did you
want to speak to this
sure i'd be happy to and i i do hear
the board interest and i do recognize
that we have um policy that's being
um worked through in in our um
board uh policy committee and so i will
take this
back to staff and we'll re-examine
what it the possibilities are but i'm
hearing
general support in looking at
alternative energy for our
bus fleet so and and really aligning to
the policy that we're um working through
in the policy committee so i will take
that back to staff
so thank you for the comment um director
constance appreciate that claire
all right thank you uh mr is there any
public comment
on the consent agenda no
all right the board will now vote on
resolutions 6291
and 6296 through 6300
all in favor please indicate by saying
yes yes
yes yes all opposed please indicate by
saying no
are there any abstentions
the consent agenda is approved by a vote
of seven to zero with student
representative
shu voting yes okay i'm gonna do a
little happy dance
um because when i uh decided to
00h 20m 00s
uh try to be chair um my goal
was to do this work that we just passed
and so i feel like um when you set out
to do something over the course of the
year and you you help make it happen
it's worth a dance so if anyone wants to
join me in dancing i'm dancing
badly michelle would dance well but i'm
happy dancing badly
all right we turn now to really what is
the heart of our work our student and
public comment
before we begin i would like to review
our guidelines for comment
we as a board thank the community for
taking time to attend this meeting and
provide your comments
public input informs our work and we
look forward to hearing your thoughts
reflections and concerns and our role as
a
and responsibility as a board is to
actively listen know that some of our
members
do take notes while you're speaking our
board office may follow up
on board related issues raised during
public testimony
we request that complaints about
individual employees
be directed to the superintendent's
office as a personnel matter
if you have additional materials or
items you would like to provide to the
board or superintendent
we ask that you email them to
publiccomment
pps.net please make sure you begin
your comment that when you begin your
comment that you clearly state your name
and spell your last name you will have
three minutes to speak and you will hear
a sound after three minutes which does
mean that it is time to conclude your
comments
ms bradshaw who do we have signed up for
student and public comment this evening
hi we have eric happel
hello hi thank you uh my name is eric
cappell
it's spelled h-a-p-p-e-l i have three
daughters in pps 11th grade 9th grade
and 6th grade
i've been working with many others
through ed 300 as an advocate for pbs
children's return to school
based on data i'm here today to voice my
support for five full days of school and
co-curricular activities
for our pps students as soon as possible
and certainly by the opening of fall
first i want to thank all of the
teachers and administration who have
done hard work
and done their best through this
challenging year this year
online only in hype then hybrid has left
us
with significant learning gaps and
mental and physical challenges
that will take years to truly understand
today given time constraints i'm focused
on the learning gaps
after watching the last board meeting i
was compelled to speak up
as i don't want there to be any mistake
the map testing data shared
indicated massive math learning losses
for all ages
presented third through eighth grade
with sixth grade indicating forty
percent of prior learning
it indicated reading loss for third to
fifth grade relative to prior years
there was some hope for sixth to eighth
grade may have improved but his doctor
as director bailey pointed out this may
have been due to statistical choices
made
and may may or may not actually be the
case it troubled me
that pps presented this story as
optimistic in the discussion that ensued
focused exclusively on the one
potentially positive reading scenario
for a subset of students the math laws
for example i did not hear once in the
conversation
this data is repeated nationwide and
similarly for other grades not discussed
national data has shown significant
learning losses for example
reading loss for k through second grade
is also quite bad
and much worse for those that were
already struggling we have no reason to
believe that pps would be any different
most of this data is already indicating
learning loss for students
and in a survey shared by u.s secretary
of education
cardona 97 of teachers surveyed
indicated learning loss for students
as the hybrid again thank you for the
effort but this is not living up to what
it can be for middle or high schools in
particular
i surveyed my daughters and others and
in my daughters
42 percent of their class time has been
study hall
for that they show up they turn on their
computer they sit silently at their desk
and do work
and all three of my daughters have said
that attendance has dropped off since
week one
i don't mean and want to harp on the bad
news but as we think about fall
we need to be eyes wide open and not
bargain with ourselves
that the outcome this year with cdl and
hybrid are okay
they are not again while many teachers
did their best
cdl and hybrid is stacked against them
by fall
with all adults and students 12 years
and older have had a choice to vaccinate
and very clear data that covet affects
the youngest learners minimally
there's no reason to deliver anything
short of five full days of school in
person
with co-curricular activities thank you
and i appreciate your time
00h 25m 00s
thank you so much thank you thanks
we have mark stefan
hi my name is mark stefan it's
spelled s-t-e-p-h-a-n
and my pronouns are he him
thank you to the members of the board
and to superintendent guerrero for
listening to my comments
i read the other day there is a risk of
full in-person instruction not occurring
in the fall
this is due to the three-foot distance
rssl guidance which would require the
district to rent additional space
and in particular hire more teachers and
these expenses are more than the
district can pay for
this information left me frustrated and
discouraged at first
but now i'm resolved to work to keep
this from happening
all kids should have the opportunity to
be back in school
my daughter needs to be back in school
their mental health depends on it
it seems that there are three options
first
advocate the state the state drop the
three-foot rule
second find more money third
do a combination of both and be creative
in finding a solution
i have no doubt pps has worked
incredibly hard in the last year
but thinking creatively of how we get
kids back in school for five full days
is now in order
the kids deserve this again to be clear
three options first drop the three foot
of distance
second find money third do both and
think
creatively these sort of problems are
never as simple
either or but the outcome that matters
is full-time
in-person instruction thank you
thank you thank you thank you
thank you for your time tonight i did
just want to say that in in my
estimation
the uh newspaper article misrepresented
some of
uh the way the budget is being rolled
out and that um later on tonight you'll
hear
about our full rollout plans for fall
and in fact hear a resolution that the
board is um
going to vote on next board meeting
around that full-time reopening
so just stay tuned for that but thank
you for your comments tonight
ms bracha do we have further public
comment this evening
yes we have iselle watson
thank you very much sorry about that it
took a while to get
off of the uh to move over to a panel
my name is watson former employee of
portland public schools
my name is spelled e z like zebra e
l l again echo zulu echo lima
lima last name watson whiskey alpha
tango
sierra oscar november
again i am a former public schools
employee of about seven and a half years
and i am here to make comments
and suggest some updates to our vision
and some updates to the evaluation
metrics that are used
for our current superintendent and the
administration that he represents
i would like to start with a a quote
from our superintendent uh whose name we
know guadalupe
guadalupe the name guadalupe could be
translated
or mean wolf in the valley
we'll come back to that so the quote
we cannot remain neutral about racism we
are ready to stand shoulder to shoulder
in solidarity
with our community in the fight against
anti-black
racism i want to tie my feedback
to the organizational climate
culture and communications plan that's
outlined in the racial equity and
justice
social the racial equity and social
justice
lens and plan that's been communicated
and i want to create some contracts
so we're going to start with that
statement about remaining neutral about
racism and standing shoulders
shoulder to shoulder with us in the
fight against anti-black
racism i want to highlight some things
from the culture
one in the culture standing shoulder to
shoulder
with us it feels like you're standing
with your back to us
let me give you a few examples of things
that have happened that i've witnessed
that to me speak to the culture in which
you have created
with your administration this is
guadalupe and
everyone that is represented here in the
board
because you guys are complicit in this
let me go ahead and get to it
when you send black men me
to the basement and when you send
00h 30m 00s
another black man
uh the the person who proceeded dr
russell brown
please make sure this enters the public
record when you
when you send us to the basement that
sends
a message especially when people are
hired to replace us
who do not work in the basement let me
ask you
does this sound like someone who is
remaining is not remaining neutral does
this sound like someone that is standing
shoulder to shoulder with us in the
fight
against racism anti-black racist
have you noticed the number of black
staff members who have recently
under your tutelage and leadership left
the district
has there been any outreach to
understand
why part of your organizational climate
culture and communications plan says
individuals throughout the organization
are self-aware and proactively
take personal responsibility to learn
grow and adapt to support racial equity
and social justice
does that sound like the does that sound
like being self-aware
let me also talk to a cultural problem
ali i see you
let me talk oh is that the sound
that's the sound that uh three minutes
have passed so i'm going to ask you to
conclude your comments with about 10
seconds
um and then we'll move on to our next
commenter okay i'll conclude my comments
here
there have been lots of things that have
occurred that the superintendent has
been in charge of and you guys have been
asleep
at the wheel for there have been a mass
exodus of black
employees and i would like to go ahead
and go on record to say that i believe
you all are outwardly racist
and i think that that needs to be
entered into into comment but i would
also and i know i know i got to go so
i'm going to wrap it i'm going to wrap
it up
i want to offer solutions there needs to
be in the evaluation
metric for the superintendent some
measure
of self-awareness how has he how has he
improved and how has he followed the
professional development plan
relative to anti-black sentiments that
everyone has expressed and i apologize i
know that i only have three minutes
and i believe that i really need to
continue this
yeah i understand let me finish and also
let's that i sent this comment and
there's an
email that i would like entered into the
public record that you receive
haley that you're meeting about i want
it entered into the public record and i
want to enter
into public record that jonathan garcia
reached out to me today two weeks after
sending the message he didn't respond
immediately until
until i made contact with several board
members and i have yet
to hear a response from the
superintendent that concludes my comment
thank you very much and i know it uh mr
watson that you have met with several
board members and you and i in fact have
a
meeting uh on the 25th to to talk more
and to hear some of them i wanted to
wait until the end of june to have
yes which i wanted to wait until the end
of june to have because uh
i'm very busy and i also know that the
problems of um that you're addressing
are things that have been going on for a
long time and continue to persist
but thank you for your time tonight
director did you have something you
wanted to say
i just wanted to yeah i i hear you and
um my heart is breaking a little bit uh
just hearing i did get your
your email as well um i think it's
serious enough that we need to address
it and
and we here on this caller the leaders
um
of of the organization and there is no
one else up above us
so i i take your concerns really
seriously
um you've described a culture that's not
welcoming
and is actually harmful and
i just want to thank you for for for for
taking the courage to step up
and we'll promise you that i i'm very
concerned about this and will do what i
can to
address any cultural changes that we can
um implement
i appreciate that i'd love to see it in
the future
we're going to move on to our next
public commenter thank you for your time
i just want to join michelle in her
comments
next week i want to excuse me i i want
to just
use this as a teaching moment for
everyone um i'm not going to point any
fingers there's nobody we're all
we're all in this together this is a
teaching moment and that it is very
difficult to
hear um it's difficult to talk about
race
um if we're going to make change we have
to get really comfortable being
uncomfortable
um if we want to make change i i
personally want to see change
but i'm just putting that call out that
we need to um build our muscles up
around being uncomfortable
and having difficult conversations and
um
00h 35m 00s
this is one of those times where we we
should not have cut off the commenter um
i understand we need to keep an agenda
but we do offer a professional courtesy
to others
um when things are important enough to
listen to thanks i think that this is
one of those moments where we also this
is a in some ways a personnel
issue and that um this is part of a
larger conversation that while it's very
important to have these comments on the
public record and we need to be above
board
this is a larger conversation that will
continue to happen
um and that this this venue might not be
the time to have that in this moment but
i know that many of us are going to
continue to work with mr watson
to speak with the superintendent and and
to be uncomfortable as we talk about
race and how
um we are continuing to focus on the the
goals we have for pps to be um
the employer of choice an employer
that's known for equity the employer
that's known for our culture that
um values all employees we're going to
go ahead
excuse me i'm going to interrupt one
more time this this actually is not a
personnel issue we
are barred from addressing personal
issues um
for many reasons um this is not a
personal issue this is not i think
a former employee it's a cultural issue
so i just want to make that clear
chair or general counsel i i heard
commentary directed at me i didn't
realize we were intending to have a
dialogue about this which
i welcome um especially if we're going
to hear different perspectives
all right um i think we're miss
mcgarrett is here and ready to speak so
um
are we ready to pick up her public
testimony are we ready to listen fully
to her is this something we need to
discuss further the only thing i would
chime in is to say that we do have a
metric in our superintendents evaluation
around the diversification of our
uh leadership in the central office and
we know we've made
incredible strides there so um
we will take into consideration you know
what mr watson what you're bringing
forward and the people who have left as
well as the people who have come in
and examine issues of culture we we have
areas of our superintendence evaluation
process and template
that go to the heart of those really
important matters that mr
mr watson has raised we will
have an opportunity to talk about that i
want to make sure that we have an
opportunity to talk about it
in the context of anti-blackness
because i think mr watson was addressing
a very specific
issue relating to a very specific group
of employees
and i don't i don't think our metric in
the
that we have fully captures that
it doesn't and i i want to add that um i
you know
you know i work for the city of portland
and there was just a study commissioned
that um we're able to hire um
black people we're not able to retain
black people we've had a 48
loss of black employees in the last
three years
uh almost 50 in the last three years and
we all know that people don't leave
great
great jobs so i just wanted to put that
out there that this is not
an uncommon thing i think we're paying
more attention to it now
all right are we ready to hear from ms
mccare
turlow before she goes we have one
person who i
do not see in the attendees who might be
in there
under a different name so i just wanted
to let them know that if they
check their name and can either email me
and let me know what to look for or to
change their name so i know to find them
for the next person okay did you want to
say your name
who we're expecting um david
sultan okay so david sultan if you're
out there
in the ether somewhere let us know um so
that we can
um get you teleported over uh after
miss mcgare speaks sorry for the delay
there um
i appreciate you sharing your public
comment tonight
oh thank you it's uh and it's hard to
come after such an important topic and
turn back to what we were talking about
before so i don't need to minimize it
it's obviously super important
my name is kim mcgare mcgair i'm the
parent of a pps 9th grader
unsurprisingly to you i'm here to talk
about reopening schools in the fall
i'm encouraged to see the board
resolution on the agenda for a full
reopening but i also watched the budget
committee meeting last week
and i saw the superintendent and senior
staff disagree about whether the budget
that's being presented to you allows for
a full reopening in the fall
with all due respect that level of
confusion at this point in the pandemic
with what our kids have been through
isn't acceptable our children have
sacrificed 15 months their education
00h 40m 00s
their social and emotional learning
their mental health we have a crisis on
our hands we have a potential enrollment
crisis if pps doesn't
does not deliver full-time school in the
fall and confidently message that to
families right now because that's when
decisions are being made
the washington post had an article today
about families moving out of state to go
to school
three of the five families were from
portland this is
imagine that families feel like they
have to move out of state so their kids
can go to school
pps stumbled badly this spring and
offered a reopening that gave our
students a small fraction of what
students in other districts received
i hear a lot of talk about equity in
these meetings and that's important but
equity extends beyond
pps there is nothing equitable about the
in-person school offered to pps
students as compared to their peers is
particularly in the western and southern
suburban districts
but here we are and all we can do is
look forward to fall the budget
committee
dialogue last week was concerning i
understand the state is making this
difficult for districts and i truly and
deeply sympathize with you and you know
that we are working as hard as we can to
get rssl
changed or eliminated but we
are more than a year into this we know
the state's going to make things overly
complicated and difficult which you
cannot do is sit on your hands and blame
the state you must plan to open schools
in the fall under today's rssl guidance
if it gets better in july great but you
must start planning for that
right now so what classrooms can't do
three feet
this is a simple math problem since
you've already figured it out for six
feet
do your occupancy multiply by four you
have classrooms that can't take all the
students
start looking for space start looking
outside start looking for staff
it must be done now lunch is challenging
with rssl
we get it start looking at alternatives
now you have hallways you have
auditoriums you have
outside restaurants got tents in weeks
you have months to work on this
and you have a boatload sorry for the
phrasing
of money and your federal money i know
you want to use it for counselors and
social workers and that's admirable but
the very first thing you have to do is
job one and that's get
the schools open use the money to do
that
cdl there's really no public health
reason for cdl but i understand you're
going to have demands for it
figure out how many families that is now
if it's not too many
there is an existing oregon charter
academy and other online options
that work better than anything pps can
design at this short
notice put those kids in that if that
doesn't work then start planning for a
full
pps cdl but it cannot be school by
school you can't manage that you don't
have
bandwidth there are many things that
need to be done to get schools open
fully in the fall and i'm just
imploring you to do them now we
this is for 14 months those days are
over there are no more excuses
to use an analogy you all must land the
plane you must land the plane on time
there is no room for error
thank you thank you
thank you thank you and i do not see
um david so that concludes who we have
signed up
um i as we conclude our public comment i
want to thank everyone for their
time um i know that um as we talk about
issues of races director depastas that
um you know we we are uncomfortable
and that these are difficult
conversations we have i think that
you know one of the things i've seen
happening in pps is
a lot of changes as we really do try to
center equity
and center our black and native students
and i i feel a little bit like there was
a little bit of
um explicitly calling superintendent
guerrero
racist and i as a white woman i can
claim that i am in fact racist that that
i live
and breathe in a white supremacist
society and so that it is innate in me
but what i would say about
superintendent guerrero is the
leadership that he has given
the work that i know he has done
personally
um on his own biases um
those comments for me were really
painful and i know that that there is a
lived experience of
mr watson and other black folks in our
school district
but i i really feel like the work that
superintendent has done
and the ways that he has showed up for
pbs kids i just want to be very clear
in naming how much he has done for
equity how much he has done
for our res j work in this district um
to just i feel like that needs to be
spoken into this space
after hearing those comments and again
not to dismiss mr watson's lived
experience but i think that this is
as we continue to um be a complex
organization that is attentive to the
ways that white supremacy shows up
in all of us not just white people
it's a part of our toxic culture that we
also um
name the work that is being done and the
places of growth so i just wanted to add
that
00h 45m 00s
and to thank superintendent guerrero for
standing in those places of discomfort
regularly um we turn
now um to the next piece of our agenda
which is our student representatives
report
um and i know that nathaniel that one of
the things the district student council
has also been talking about is the ways
that white supremacy shows up and how
your dsc can be more diverse and more
representative of all of our students
um so would you like to share your
report now at this time
uh yes i would thank you
so today is one week from the may 18th
special election which will decide the
composition of our next
board to those of you who are permitted
to vote
please remember to submit your ballots
by
the 18th recently the district student
council has been working to endorse
candidates
from zones four five and six for this
election the dsc conducted interviews
with all of the eight filed candidates
uh in which they were asked
such questions as what is your vision
for the role and scope of
district-wide student government and how
will you advance
racial equity and social social justice
in bps
the district student council ultimately
voted to endorse
green for zone four gary hollins for
zone five
and the director julia brim edwards for
zone six
i'll also note that this is our last
meeting prior to
the pbs student summit students if you
are interested
in attending and have not already rsvp'd
go to the summit poster in the google
form linked
in the google folder linked on
the dsc's web page which can be found at
pps.net
page 1796.
board members and senior staff please
keep an eye out for
the zoom link invites which should be
coming soon once again
the summit is from 10 to 2 on the
22nd finally i would also like to
acknowledge
that in addition to national mental
health awareness month
may is asian american and pacific
islander heritage month
and i extend my good wishes to everyone
celebrating it
uh thank you and that concludes my
reward
thank you student representation for
your report did you have
uh any news you wanted to share with us
about next year
or is that something you're keeping
close to the vest for now um
i'm keeping it for now but i should
share it yes hopefully so uh celebrate
with nathaniel like good news coming for
his future and he will share that
individually with us all uh
superintendent guerrero would you like
to provide your report now
yes thank you chair good evening
directors
we have a few slides for you
when i started this to those at home
listening to us live stream
um i appreciate that we've had some uh
full agendas
uh uh and i'm gonna share some thoughts
uh
on some of these items as we get to them
including on our fall reopening update
which is now a regular part
of our regular meeting agendas at our
last
regular board meeting i reiterated our
intention
to fully open schools for in-person
instruction this coming fall
and as the district's chief executive
when asked
if we are ready to do that i want to
make sure that
we've done the analysis and i take
seriously that we've considered
all of the variables that we have a
viable contingency plan
that we're ready to implement so i can
confidently affirm
yes we're ready to directors so
this evening directors you're going to
hear about this related work
that has been ongoing tonight
immediately following this report
as we work towards achieving this state
of readiness
not just for the full array of summer
programming that
is underway but also for the opening of
the new school year on campus this fall
in fact you're going to notice a new
theme in logo pps
together again but first per tradition
uh we have a couple new members
joining team pps we're excited about
that i
want to introduce you to unfortunately
i'm only going to have
one now to introduce you to so i'm
excited to welcome kate wilkinson to our
legal team as
our new assistant general counsel kate
will be able to tell you
more about her formal legal experience
both in and out of k-12
but her dedication to public education
including pps
was particularly compelling to us for
00h 50m 00s
instance
kate served on the pps audit committee
as a volunteer community member
until resigning recently so she could
serve and support
pps in a different way as a leadership
level staff member for
the district kate also serves as a
volunteer on the boards of
sei one of our culturally specific
partners and
classroom law project and is committed
to the work that we
and our community partners do together
to serve our students
kate received her bachelor's degree from
colorado college and graduated from
the university of wisconsin law school
so kate is
is joining us here this evening and i
i'd like to invite her to
say a few words kate
am i on
thank you superintendent good evening
directors it's a pleasure to
join you and to be celebrating my second
week with pps
as the superintendent briefly stated i
come with
21 years of legal practice i spent 10
years in private practice and then
the next 11 in-house including several
years
in salem with oregon school boards
association
most recently i was
a leader of lawyers at standard
insurance company
and i'm just thrilled to be back in the
education world and look forward to
working with all of you
so thank you thank you happy birthday
welcome welcome welcome although wish
you from the audit committee
welcome to portland public schools kate
we're glad to have you in this important
leadership role
um for the rest of my report this
evening i wanted to mix it up
a little bit we've been saying as we've
said for many months now that despite
being
rather preoccupied and consumed by
dealing with the disruption of the
pandemic and
preparing our schools through the
transitions and stages of cdl
limited in person and then hybrid and
now on towards summer planning and a
full reopening in the fall
even with all of this related work we've
been
concurrently maintaining a focus on uh
many of our key district priorities so
just as we continue to bring
aboard new and talented leaders uh and a
diverse new class of appointed
uh school administrators we continue to
move towards realizing our vision
we continue to keep our eye on the prize
so a number of exciting strands of work
are ongoing across our organization
and i thought our directors and our
community would be interested in hearing
just
a few quick updates on a few of these
important work strands
so i've invited three of our dynamic
leaders to join me
for my report this evening
first i'd like to welcome dr kimberly
mateer
who will share with directors a quick
update about our professional learning
and leadership career pathway work here
at the district
dr matthir
good evening chair lowry
and vice chair bailey directors
superintendent
guerrero and
i think representative student
representative shu
uh good to see all of you this evening
um excited to be able to present an
update about the work of the career
lattice
which is really about building uh the
capacity
of our system to meet on our pps
reimagined vision
we're really focused on not just
the office of professional learning and
leadership but we work in tight
partnership with human resources and
other key departments
around designing and enacting several
key strategies
across a continuum of support
along an employee's career pathway
we're really focused around uh
strategies that we'll get at addressing
our persisting disparities
disproportionality
and predictability and outcome that we
see in our system
um and so some of those key strategies
you'll see listed here
our first one that i wanted to talk
about or introduce is really leveraging
learning priorities across our
partnership so we work um
we've been working in deep partnership
with our pre-service or our higher ed
institutions
and really looking at redesigning what's
happening
in pre-service learning before they
enter into our system to make sure they
have a strong foundation
in the knowledge skills and dispositions
that we need them to
have to meet our pps reimagine goals
with our educator essentials um and so
we've been doing that
00h 55m 00s
since 2018 it's been a lot of long
hours and we're just very grateful that
our partners have
dedicated a lot of time and faculty
doing that work with us the second
strategy
that we are focused on is really
explicitly
naming oftentimes you know people say
well
i don't know what to do there's no
silver bullet but we have actually lots
of
answers in the research and we have
evidence of things that work
and so it's about making those
strategies explicit and we are doing so
in our
programs such as our aspiring principal
program that we have
very um proud of the assistant
principals in that program that have
implemented change projects within their
respective school
sites to address issues of disparity
disproportionality and predictability
and outcomes
and so we'll be hearing some
presentations from them
later on this month about what they're
learning and then our third strategy our
third key strategy is really about
what's um uh defining the knowledge
skills and dispositions so that we're
really clear
so that they'll be visible and
measurable
we know that in the leadership
research through the wallace foundation
that when our systems use
standards to drive um development
for our leaders and our educators that
we actually can have
the best outcomes or better outcomes in
addressing the problems of practice
that we face and so we are using
standards to
really design all of our programming
and defining explicitly the success
criteria that
um will help all of us our leaders meet
the
goals of our vision as i said earlier
and then to make that um more explicit
and visible
to our stakeholders because i do believe
in accountability
we are building an adult learning
dashboard um
so a lot of times we want to focus on
what
uh what's happening with students but we
know that our adults
are the largest influencers over student
outcomes and so we
really want to be looking at where are
the gaps in the adult
knowledge and the adult skills and then
provides targeted supports to build that
capacity so that we can
begin to work on uh shifting our culture
as well as our practices to make sure
that our students will all
be successful and especially our black
and native students
so that's a little bit about the work
that we're doing in our
office in partnership with many
departments um
regional and state partners
thank you thank you dr here there's been
a
thank you for your dedicated leadership
uh
you know what we've been dealing with
pandemic dr matier and team have been
uh very diligent about building out our
leadership development uh
supporting uh our employees and making
sure those career pathways
are built in long-term sustainable ways
with
especially our partners and higher ed
institutions
across the state so thank you dr matier
uh next second mini update i want to
welcome dr emily glasgow
to share some of the exciting work
that's happening in early education
uh pictured here is uh a young scholar i
met and his father who had the pleasure
of meeting on the first day of in-person
learning in april at sacajawea head
start
and like a good early learner the newest
pps student figured out
his mask and school arrival routine in
no time at all
and in fact there's a great deal of
learning happening with our youngest
scholars
but here to tell you a little bit more
is director emily glasgow
thank you superintendent and thank you
for having me here tonight to update you
a little bit on the work of the early
learners department i'm
always excited to talk about the work
we're doing i couldn't be
more proud of the progress we've made
over the past couple of years
um our p3 advisory council which is now
a robust group of over 50
building administrators central office
leaders teachers secretaries
counselors and community partners
has been meeting monthly for almost two
years and working really hard to
backward map the graduate portrait to a
set of early learner core values
that we are now trying to operationalize
and roll out into the world
so i wanted to just share some of the
things that that team has been working
on
um hopefully you've seen some evidence
over the last few months and will
continue over the next few months
to see evidence of our reimagined
connect to kindergarten strategies
we have totally reworked the way we
think about the transition to
01h 00m 00s
kindergarten we know that it is not
always as smooth of a bridge and as warm
of a handoff as we want it to be
for our families and students so we've
been really working with our school
teams
to make sure that there is a warm
connective kind of
receiving body in our kindergarten teams
all of our kindergarten schools now have
kindergarten websites attached to their
school websites and they've all created
connective and welcoming school videos
um and they've also reworked their
connect events that they have
this spring and this summer to be less
of an informational session and more of
a relationship building session and
community building session
um you'll see hopefully around the
community in the next couple months that
all of our incoming kindergarten
students this year will receive an on my
way to k
kindergarten t-shirt you can see an
image on this slide
we're really working to build pride in
the transition into pps in kindergarten
we think it's something that we should
be celebrating as we bring new families
into our pipeline
you'll also see lawn signs and you can
see that image here
on most of our school grounds as you
start to drive around the city and
that's to make kindergarten registration
easier for our families they can
actually just use a qr code to register
right from those lawn signs at pretty
much any pps school in the city
um we are also this summer expanding our
early kindergarten transition summer
program
typically that's a program for incoming
kindergarten families this year we're
expanding to include first grade
families at our target school
communities
we know that our current kindergarten
families may not have had that warm
welcome that we want them to have and so
we want to make sure they get it this
next time around as they transition to
first grade
um similarly in the fall we're going to
have a new ramp up for our kindergarten
and first grade families
which looks like a staggered start on
our calendars thank you for approving
that
um what that means is that all of our
kindergarten families prior to the first
day of school next year
will get a one-on-one connective
conversation with their teacher
and all of our kindergarten students
will get sort of a practice warm-up day
before the real day so they can get
acclimated
in a smaller group setting to the
routines of school and the staff of
school before they're expected to do a
full day in the larger group
and our first grade students will have
sort of a modified version of that in
the fall as well
i also wanted to highlight that we have
a
a huge push for pre-k enrollment
underway uh in addition to our
kindergarten registration season right
now
due to limited enrollment this year
because of the pandemic
we actually have close to 900 seats in
our pps head start and pre-k
programs for three and four-year-olds
registration is
open now um applications are on the
early learners department website
and the head start website and we want
to just make sure the community is
really aware we've got a lot of
wonderful seats available for three and
four-year-olds
for full-day pre-k programming and then
the last thing i wanted to highlight
is that in addition to working on
bringing families in in a different way
and supporting the kindergarten
transition
our p3 advisory council in our
department is also really leaning into
starting to reimagine the kindergarten
program itself
because we're working on trying to more
seamlessly align what happens in pre-k
and what happens in kindergarten and
make sure that kindergarten is really um
an academically rigorous place but also
a developmentally and culturally
appropriate place for our five and
six-year-olds and their families
and so we have nine schools that went
through an application process that are
going to be joining us in a year-long
kindergarten innovation cohort
we kick off this thursday and they're
going to be helping us from the ground
up from the classroom
really learn how to implement our early
learner core values
in the classroom setting and reimagine
our kindergarten program so that it
better serves and meets all the needs of
our incoming kindergarten students
that's my very quick update there's
always more and i'm always happy to talk
about it thanks for having us tonight
and look for these t-shirts and images
around the community we will
try to make sure you all get t-shirts as
well thank you dr glasgow we've enjoyed
visiting
the head start programs and thank you to
you and your team for
being active role in preschool for all
efforts that are
also coming to the county thank you well
directors you've heard about our career
pathway work you've heard about how our
early learner work is doing
and uh because we love the arts i want
to make sure that you get an
update on visual and performing arts
i want to welcome kristen brayson
kristen and her talented
visual and performing arts team will be
presenting their annual state of the
arts a pps report to directors
uh later this spring but for now she's
going to give you
a sneak peek at progress with the master
arts education plan and some of the
emerging summer arts
planning as well so welcome kristin
well thank you superintendent guerrero
it's a delight to be here tonight
it's a pleasure to be addressing you
board chair lowry
and board of directors and student
representative
shu i know we have tons that we could
01h 05m 00s
cover so this is
just a snackable snack snapshot
of our work so far there's a lot of text
on the screen so i want to direct
your eyes to the left because that is
most
immediate right now we have
gone ahead and moved forward with a sort
of pre-implementation if you will
of the master arts education plan
although the master arts education plan
the ink has not dried yet
i'll talk about that in a second through
some direct
investments of the student investment
act some
really teeming work with guadalupe
guerrero and also the all the directors
we had decided to go ahead this year and
prioritize
a pre-phase one and by cluster we've
added in
schools specifically title 1 csi
and tsi schools to make sure that every
school in the jefferson roosevelt
cluster for this year had music and
visual arts
for next year we're going to extend that
implementation
to mcdaniel's cluster franklin and
cleveland again
serving our title 1 schools it gets
better
because we knew that we needed to also
provide infrastructure support for these
schools
these are very specialized learning
environments and in order to deliver the
true experience to students
we wanted to provide some seed money to
get classrooms set up
and by the stuff and things that really
deliver a dynamic arts education
so that's a real quick snapshot of what
we're doing
now to address current and immediate
needs for arts educations and our goals
around pathways
if you move to the middle column we have
our mape
sneak peek we are going to launch in the
fall of 2021 you will get a more
expansive
glimpse at what we're doing as as
superintendent guerrero said this
late spring but here gives you an a
little
a little look into our six strategic
goals
one thing that's really important to see
here and call out
is that every single goal we have has
res j
as a cross-cutting theme so we've
identified
embedded and prioritized that across the
entire plan
and we'll be able to speak to that
really directly as we bring that back to
you soon
we also wanted to call out some of the
system assurances and this is in no
particular order it is also not the
exhaustive
list there's some highlights here around
how we
want to make sure we have system
cohesion and coherency around arts
education so that includes district
level policies and practices
again the pathways completion so we've
identified what we're doing this year
and next year but what comes next
we also want to make sure that we are
aligning and supporting the pps
graduate portrait we feel like arts
education is uniquely positioned
to support students sense of self and
belonging and that it creates the
conditions for artistic and cultural
literacy we know all of these things
support our students as we're moving
toward the graduate portrait
and then finally one of the things
that's very important to our work
is that we're touching base and feeling
the work of every single department
at central office and understanding the
complex nuances
and how we might be in service of other
plans across the system
so that's also included in our work of
the master arts education plan
and then finally some really great
celebrations to have in the right hand
column
around comprehensive distance learning
we have produced
32 weeks of lesson plans for arts
education in all four disciplines
it's an astounding amount of work
they're all thematic for example
music lessons for eight weeks in black
american music
we publish we to today we've published a
total of 376
lessons in dance music theater and
visual arts
all of these lessons reinforced
culturally sustaining practices
and social emotional learning we have
started the pre-adoption process we are
really fortunate to be prioritized here
at the first string
with with having six million dollars for
a visual performing arts adoption
we have done pre-planning to engage 67
teachers
and here is where we want to shift
practice
for the future and reimagine arts
education
we want our students to experience arts
education as a place that they
foundationally understand
culture and understand how to express
themselves within that
so we're really excited to show you the
emerging
themes of that work and we'll give you
an update on that too next time we see
you
and then finally we get this exciting
opportunity of continuing the third year
of the summer arts academy
we have expanded the programming a
little bit with the focus
on um very direct focus on specific
01h 10m 00s
schools
for rising sixth through ninth graders
um some of the expanding pro
expanded programming um that you will
see
is a tech theater component and we are
partnering
with portland five to think about ways
that we can bring in
stage hands to directly work with our
students as an example
and then finally the summer safety
enrichment rfp went out to our arts
partners we actively engaged 47 plus
arts partners on a consistent basis and
we've had
a lot of folks submit rfps
to be engaged in our summer work so
that's a very positive element
and then to close before i throw it back
we have the heart of portland that's
going to be happening june 10th
this is a celebration of learning in the
arts
throughout a really difficult time but
we'll be able to really show the joy of
student learning
and so be on the lookout in your emails
for an invitation to that event
thank you so much so much for letting me
share
miss bryson
can you send us um in the phase one
phase two
of the art at art pathways editions i'm
interested
in what schools next year are going to
be
have editions made in mcdaniels franklin
and cleveland
yep absolutely thank you thank you
an update of the the map from a couple
of years ago
that showed all the incomplete
links uh an update of that would be
pretty sweet
um and i i'm guessing that might be part
of what you bring back to us
uh yeah i can give you a quick
comparative analysis though that kind of
you know um shows you the ways that
we've made some connections and progress
here
yeah it's just huge steps forward
thank you to kristen and our baba team
um for all that continued progress and
and yes i think when
directors see the four end of your
report you'll notice
that more and more of those pathways are
getting completed and aligned
speaking of the arts i wanted to end
just by sharing a couple photos from
last week's visits to schools by
musicians from
the oregon symphony it was a real treat
for students
it was a lovely way to show appreciation
for our teachers and school
administrators last week as well
so our thanks to the symphony for live
music by
professional musicians uh for our
students uh and just as the cellists can
read and perform music at the same time
uh we're continuing to multitask also
just to keep the business of the
district
moving forward so as i mentioned the
pandemics created
a special kind of focus for us but we're
continuing to to do the work of
eliminating
inequities and you just heard three ways
growing and cultivating diverse talent
making sure early learners have a strong
foundation
as well as making sure that we close
some of those historic
gaps in access to pathways whether it's
in career technical education or in this
case arts
the work has continued uh so that
concludes my report for this evening
thank you
thank you team
we thank you to that uh for that amazing
presentation
and thank you to the whole team for
inspiring us with all the ways that pbs
is continuing to
grow and look to the future um even
while we have navigated this pandemic
um superintendent guerrero uh i think
that the next item
is the hot topic of the night that i
know we have lots of passionate people
interested in
and lots of questions um the update on
fall reopening
so we're gonna get right to that so can
what can you tell us
about the fall yes
uh we're very passionate about it too
thank you chair lowry
now that hybrid learning and limited in
person is underway
we have begun planning for our full
return to five-day instruction
in the fall so as i mentioned previously
we're going to keep
the regular updates going throughout the
spring and summer to keep you informed
on all the planning and preparation so
that we are ready
uh in the fall so i'm going to start off
we have
a few slides just to cover the
information of where we're at
uh what's been accomplished questions
we're working on some of the variables
that we've talked about previously and
where we are in that work
so uh we have a few slides we're going
to put up here
so first of all just recognizing
speaking of the variables you know that
we have been living
hold on
we can go ahead and go to the second uh
slide there uh you know
i've shared now a couple of times uh you
know our intent
to fully reopen and making sure that
01h 15m 00s
we're prepared to do that
um the next slide uh and as we get sort
of into the details for
fall reopening and an update um i want
to reiterate our our guiding principles
haven't changed so
uh there are a number of variables
shifts and changes that are
been swirling around us for the last 14
months but uh we're remaining deliberate
and sort of
what's guiding our decision making so
skipping to slide four to really just
kind of call out
uh what some of those variables are uh
because it has been a dynamic reality
that we've been working with here so
even though there continues to be some
significant progress although that's
been a fluid situation in the
communities fight against govid
i'm trying to get the slideshow to
advance for me it won't superintendent
so give me just a moment
sure
uh so there's a few things that haven't
changed for us of course we remain
committed to
the health and safety of our students
and staff we're going to continue
partnering with our community-based
partners public health
experts our labor partners in the
business community to create the
conditions for our schools to
to open fully so um i just wanted to
make sure
and call out um a few of those variables
i i think they've we've covered them
previously but
uh setting the stage here
we know that the health metrics are one
of those key pieces
the rate of vaccination which we're glad
to see is becoming now
more accessible particularly for our
secondary age students and
and promising that uh the age group
might even go down to 12
uh pretty soon and the way that we're
making that
more accessible for for our students as
well
can you go ahead and advance roseanne
there
and i think i've already covered that so
if you want to go down to the health
metrics
i think the broader community and
directors are recognizing that there's
we've been a little bit of a upward
trend here but
some signs that maybe that's headed back
down again
um so we are watching that very
carefully
and to say a little bit more on sort of
an important factor in making sure
that continues to to turn downward i
want to invite courtney wessling
to speak a bit more about this trend and
vaccinations
did you just call for me yes courtney
wesley
i missed my name it was adding me thank
you sorry for the
the uh the late arrival here um
so good evening directors i'll run us
through a couple slides and i'll hand it
over
um so on this slide that you can see
we're uh we're in looking in like things
are starting to
stabilize a bit um we're sort of at the
tipping point of the fourth surge
infections look like they're heading on
the you know on a downward trend
and hospital rates are stabilizing um
you may have heard today that the
governor announced
vaccination targets to more fully reopen
organs economy
she's setting a 70 statewide goal to
reach oregon
oregonian 16 and older with a first dose
and that would help to lift
risk level restrictions so that's
forward momentum that's exciting to hear
she's also making a commitment to if you
if if a county can hit 65 but offer
plans
for um closing the equity gap in
vaccinations but that would also
um get you get you to a lower risk level
potentially so
a couple of options there next slide
okay so vaccinations i just mentioned
uh the um the vaccination target that
the governor has set
forth this afternoon um we obviously are
well aware that oregonians age 16 and
older are eligible to receive
pfizer just pfizer right now
that's obviously a two-dose vaccine
we've been pushing that information out
to our high school communities and have
a good partnership going with mesd and
all for oregon health partners at the
convention center to
transport anyone who needs a yellow bus
ride and get them signed up and
registered to get their vaccine we've
had a lot of students interested
not as many students interested in the
bus but that's secondary we just want
them to go
get the vaccine and and if they want to
take us up on that transportation offer
even better
um and we have another day tomorrow so
we've been kind of streamlining the
process
last week was good but this week will be
better
the high school leaders have been
awesome and flexible with us to work
through the planning
so we'll keep that going the convention
center's
going to stop prime doses after may 26th
or 27th i should say so we'll continue
getting buses over there
through that time and then they'll go
back for their second dose three weeks
01h 20m 00s
later
and we'll be messaging that as well um
the other exciting and i should also say
that where we are with multnomah county
vaccinations is 52.3 percent
um only 36.8 have had both shots 15.5
um still need that second booster dose
um earlier i guess it was yesterday it
feels like it feels like a long time ago
but yesterday the fda approved
the use of pfizer for us children ages
12 to 15.
um the cdc cdc still has to approve
that and then the western states
scientific
work group has to approve that and then
oha would have to approve it
it looks like we could have that
approval as soon as friday
which is really exciting and then of
course we would um add that
into our communication to the to sending
people to the convention center
we are going to be rolling out some more
broad communication about the importance
of vaccinations
you'll see on this slide a little box
and that's an example of the social
media
uh art that you'll see soon enough
um so we're excited about that news
obviously you know the consent issues
are
key here 15 and up in oregon can consent
without don't need parental consent to
get a vaccine
so we'll be working through that and um
we're going to continue to partner with
our public health officials our labor
partners
and our community-based organizations to
help get that message out that
vaccinations are important
and we need to work together to get that
done next slide
okay um so obviously the
next step is what is the ready school
safe learner's guidance going to look
like and when is it going to be released
um so everybody's looking forward to
working through that we are told it will
the expected the expected release is
mid-july july 19th
about 44 days before the start of school
we anticipate that those guidelines are
going to
obviously update us on a few things
continued use of school metrics what
will that look like
the health and safety requirements in
our classrooms our transportation
um and in athletics uh distance learning
requirements and instructional time
and with that i'm going to throw it over
to dan young i believe
uh courtney before you go can i just ask
one question
um so did i hear you say that the oregon
convention center vaccination site is
going to
close at the end of may they're going to
stop um offering first doses at the end
of may
they're going to close down in i think
around june 19th is the day i saw
so um what's the plan for
vaccine distribution
it's not totally clear but director alan
oha director pat ellen said today that
they are really trying to shift gears to
medium level
uh vaccine events in communities we are
in those conversations
everyone is very well aware that we want
to be good partners schools are a great
place to
bring people and offer opportunities for
families
we need a health partner to do that we
are at the table
and i think it's it's been
it's mostly been a matter of shifting
downshifting from big mega events
to community-centered events so we know
that there have been some of those
but they've been really focused the
county for example is really focused on
their fqhc population
which is their medicaid and uninsured
population and on by pop communities
so we're really um kind of waiting for
some guidance from oha
and we've been in i've been in a couple
meetings around that lately
to see how we can best partner and join
forces because we need to do this as a
community we need to do this together
yeah i'm i i am well i've
i've uh i've been a vocal advocate of
using schools as vaccination sites
and um but i'm also aware that
there are a great many uh logistical
issues
in play especially for the um
for pfizer and moderna that have very um
very strict requirements around
refrigeration
and all that so um so anything we can do
to help please let us know um
and um one other question um
july 19th for new guidance
for next school year um
seems seems to be uh
a little late um is there any
possibility that
the guidance could come out sooner than
that um
there's always a possibility director
moore
um i'm with you i think um i think
they're
i'm happy to help push on that and i
01h 25m 00s
agree with you
as am i and it's like
as well so do keep us informed about
what we can i think
if we have time an intergovernmental
committee maybe we can talk about this
as well
what is that the 19th pegged against
why the 19th is their deadline right i
don't know i haven't heard
but i'm happy to i'm happy to get an
answer
it just seems completely random and
i know the expectation will be you need
to you need you'll be open
in uh late august or early september
um but not realizing how
cramped that makes our planning
yeah we can work on it i'm happy to work
with you on on how we
um can put a little pressure there
so if i guess okay so let me
um let me also take this opportunity
um do we have any
uh information about um
oha's response to the
federal funding for a robust
testing system for asymptomatic cases
i have not heard any updates from oha on
testing
i know the issue but i have not heard
any updates
because i think that could be a
an important element to um not only
opening schools
for you know all day five days a week
but also keeping them open in order to
monitor any disease
transmission that might be happening
among
students and staff be before it becomes
an actual outbreak
so again anything i can do to
help there please um thank you and i
have my list and i appreciate you
raising these issues
and i will follow up
i would just um on that i would be
really interested in our um
health panels input on that issue i um
dr moore and i have talked about this
and i stress doctor to put us in our
relative places
um in terms of overall knowledge and and
i understand her passion and it makes a
compelling case
you know i have also read um other
doctors you know who who have sort of
questioned the efficacy
of of of of sort of the the blanket
testing um
you know of all people so i just for me
this is one where i always want to go
back and and
defer to the public health experts and
so i would be interested in what our
health panel says about
um um whether that is um effective in
terms of actually catching cases
and and um and you know potentially
limiting any any spread in schools
and director scott i was just going to
say the same thing so
uh from the health panel
um in the sake of full disclosure
i i just want to make it clear i i
appreciate the honorific but i am not an
md
so i make no claims
okay if there are no more questions on
this slide i'm going to kick it over to
dan
young and thank you all
thank you courtney thank you courtney i
can assure you
actually one can ask one question
courtney um
i'm just wondering if they're in this or
maybe this is superintendent guerrero
whether there are any districts
in oregon or odes contemplating
a vaccine requirement
for students
of any district that is contemplating
that but
i haven't seen a survey you know there's
i don't know if that information is
um i don't know if people are talking
very widely about that
i'm interested every university now
is making that a requirement for the
fall return so director from edwards we
will we will look at uh we will do an
uh a look at uh what's happening across
the state and bring that back to
the board uh in a further update great
julia what age group are you referring
to 12 and up
so i mean given that the
12 to 15 hasn't been
um it's not approved yet is it or i
think it's
it was approved yesterday i think
fda approved but it still has to go
through a couple more hoops
yeah that's that's we're very close but
the prospect of getting all our students
vaccinated over the summer
01h 30m 00s
uh given given where we are with adults
um raises questions
there's also a difference between uh
authorization for
an emergency use authorization um and a
a full authorization um i think we are
um probably as i understand it pfizer
has
uh requested um full authorization
so that process will be going forward
over the next few months
um i i suspect it will be a
considerably longer time for full
authorization
for vaccination for vaccines for
children
let me just clarify that is not to imply
that there are any safety
issues it's um it's a bureaucratic
process
that the fda fda has established to
ensure
um you know full vetting and
um uh you know uh
it includes a substantial component
of post-vaccination follow-up so
there is of necessity a time lag
yeah i just raise it because i know at
the university level
it was nobody was doing it and then
pretty much now everybody's doing it and
it seems like we should um engage our
health panel
early on and i appreciate jonathan
garcia
saying that we're going to follow up but
it it just i know a lot of kids who are
engaged in sports
who are 16 and older and probably those
who have greater access than others
are already getting vaccinated so i just
think
we should dive into the topic um so that
we're ready to go
knowing that there's you know it's
different than adults
all right are we ready to move on to dan
young because i know we have a lot more
to cover tonight
all right dan
may i remind our chief operating officer
turning the microphone on my head
thank you it's really embarrassing
good evening directors and
superintendents i want to let you know
that staff are looking at
school capacity and space needs for fall
we've already run a preliminary capacity
model that assumes
three-foot distancing it will still be
required in fall and that
all students will return to in-person
learning uh we estimate most classrooms
will be able to accommodate full
enrollment without much modification
however we do anticipate some physical
changes will be necessary
including replacement of furniture uh
some classroom changes
potential repurposing of non-traditional
classroom spaces
or schedule changes our next step in our
effort is to model furniture setups in
every classroom this is
something similar that we did for hybrid
uh identify
site-specific capacity constraints and
then identify resolutions
staff will be working closely with
school administrators and updating
assumptions along the way
next slide please dan what is how do you
define
overwhelming majority is that 60 is that
90 so we our first model we ran we're
able to pretty quickly look at about 80
percent
of the classrooms in the district uh
and i'll say a relatively low percentage
of those
uh showed capacity issues uh that said
you know we need to move on to the next
step of modeling those
one of the classrooms and continuing to
attest what our assumptions are because
we are making assumptions about usable
space
how much space will be needed uh uh
space for egress
and circulation as well so it's
it's a really good start and we feel
pretty good that we'll be able to
resolve those
uh capacity issues but now we need to
get more into the detail
yeah really promising yeah and just a
ground level view i visited
three schools today two elementary and
middle school and
none of the principals thought there
would be much of an issue
in accommodating other students
at that three foot spacing
clear clearly there's always some some
things around the margin to play with
but
nothing extraordinary
great uh on this slide just one note
that we anticipate and look forward to
return to a more traditional school day
to that end human resources
transportation nutrition services and
many others
are busy making plans and preparations
for full opening in fall
2021 and we look forward to writing
updates to the board as plans and
efforts progress
and we aim to frame that information
with what we know now
uh what we don't know and when we will
know more
and i think with that if there are any
other questions i'll be turning it over
to
01h 35m 00s
jonathan garcia thank you dan can i
just say uh going forward
um again i'm my baseline assumption
is that the classroom issue won't be a
big one in terms of the
space accommodation and we can flex into
some other spaces if necessary
the questions i have are more around
lunch and transportation
so in in the in the near future or
when when all in good time when we're
ready to have that sussed out
um that would be of interest i
understood
absolutely uh director bailey we will uh
and that is our our commitment to
this board uh is to provide regular
updates uh jonathan garcia chief of
staff here at pps
uh wanted to share a few of our
commitments to uh uh with you
and our broader community uh which uh
mirror
in many ways the resolution that i know
this board
is considering adopting
our commitment is to work closely with
the school board
our labor partners our community-based
organizations to really create the
conditions
that will allow for a full return
full time five days a week in person
this fall
we also know and we will commit to
adhering to
federal and state guidance and create
the path that appropriately
mitigates transmission of combat 19 that
is really important for us
as one of our guiding principles we also
plan to provide a comprehensive virtual
learning option
for those students and families who are
unwilling or unable to return
to in-person learning in the fall we
will provide an
update um soon to this board on
those uh on those plans as well we will
continue to work with our public health
officials and community partners
as director moore uh continues to remind
us at every board meeting
the importance of getting vaccinated
uh washing your hands of of taking care
of one another
and it's really important that that we
as a public school system
do our part uh in that effort to ensure
that
that our our students our families are
know
about vaccine safety and other other
other issues related to this topic and
then the last thing
as i've said and we've we've reiterated
we will be providing regular updates to
the school board and community
as we learn more and as we continue our
planning for fall 2021.
with that we will open it up for any
further questions
or or comments from the board
let's go i think there might be quite a
lot of questions here so let's go
in um birth order just for funsies
um that means that the time in the year
you were born
not who's we're not calling out who's
oldest um
we begin with director de pass who uh is
our january baby
did you did i miss something did you
just say you're not saying that i'm the
oldest
but i'm close yeah i'm saying we're
calling people in order of when in the
year their birthday falls
not birth order as far as like who's the
oldest among us
thank you i um i'm really happy to hear
that uh we're planning to open full-time
five days a week uh with this with the
distance with the spacing three foot
spacing and i'm
curious and that's conditional on i'm
assuming that cases
continue to go down um i also had a test
a question about the testing if we were
considering
any type of testing i know some
districts are doing testing
um but yeah i'm i'm i i'm i'm wondering
i'm hoping that the assumptions are the
cases will go down and in that case we
will open and i'm wondering what we do
if um that's not the case or if there's
another spike
and i'm assuming if there's another
spike that we um continue with uh
distance learning
yeah director to pass we will uh we will
coordinate and work very closely with
our public health officials here in
multnomah county
and we will take their guidance uh and
direction on how we proceed
in the in the chance that there is a
spike or other variants
of cova 19 that populate this is a
ever-evolving
a public health issue and we will rely
on our public health officials to
to to to guide us
and then one more question um did
courtney say that we
would consider having test vaccination
sites
at some of our schools um if that if we
could find a partner
correct director to pass so courtney is
currently and her team
sorry courtney you you came back you
said go ahead and uh
and share thanks
um yeah so director to pass we're
exploring
all of our options um we want to be a
01h 40m 00s
site if that makes sense
with community partners if they want to
utilize our spaces
um we've made that pretty clear in a lot
of different at a lot of different
tables
so um yes we want to do that and we just
need people with vaccines right we can't
do that
we can offer space and staff support
great thank you
all right student representative shu you
are next in our birth order
all right could you come back to me
again um
yes all right director scott
um i'll pass this round i i've had a
number of conversations with staff and
so i'm happy to go back and
talk a little more when we introduce the
resolution
my question is about as we continue our
focus on our res j lens and on
equity what are we hearing as far as
our partners in communities of color
around
how we can support getting families
access to vaccines and also
what those folks are maybe thinking
about come fall because i know we've
heard a lot from our
white parents about really wanting to
return to full five days and i know that
we continue to hear that there's um a
disproportionate effect of covet on
our communities of color here in
portland
director lowry thanks for the question
uh uh i will take that back uh and
connect with
uh our senior advisor on racial equity
oh there we go they're bringing
candy over so i will uh i forgot that we
have a green room so danny
hi there
i'm sorry i'm having some internet
troubles um could you repeat
the question yes my question was um
how are we are we and maybe courtney can
answer those two
around the vaccine part how are we
helping support um
our communities of colors in vaccine
access and then also what are we hearing
from
our culturally responsive partners and
um families of color
around us what they're thinking for fall
um noticing that we've heard from a lot
of white parents about this desire to
return but also being aware that
covid has disproportionately impacted
communities of color here in portland
yeah so uh primarily i've just had
conversations primarily with our sun
agencies and our resj partners
so a lot of our culturally specific
organizations are sort of moving moving
slowly back into in person i think that
they're continuing to hear
quite a bit of reluctance and worry
about
um about sort of coved given some of the
disproportionate
impact on their communities and i think
the other
piece that we're hearing is that there
are more and more
early early on when the vaccines were
being
distributed we heard more information
about sort of lack of access
particularly for
uh sort of families but now that there's
more um
more availability and different phases
are open we're hearing that many of our
our partners have either sort of gotten
the vaccine through
eligibility through uh some of the work
that their partnership with us as well
as other eligibility
i think that our partners continue to
worry about making sure that
multi-generational households where you
have older
adults along with very young kiddos
uh sort of worry about that um about
that
uh issue um so i think that we're
hearing a lot of that
we're still hearing quite a bit of
reluctance when we did our school
tours for some of the reopening a lot of
our partners came in
almost every agency was represented in
our school tours
and in talking with different staff um
just anecdotally
there was about a 50 50 split in terms
of kind of where
individual staff were in terms of their
reluctance
or suspicion around the
vaccine and you know i think we're
continuing to partner with multnomah
county and their health department
um you you all had the opportunity to
hear from
one of you know the the health
department and the reach program in
terms of some of the work that they're
doing
and multnomah county has been really
great in offering uh not only
vaccine access for different culturally
specific communities
in their uh sort of like different
locations so
organizations like neya family center
sei
erko have had very specific vaccine
drives so i think
um we're hearing uh that access is
is improving that folks have access um
and but that reluctance is still a big
issue
um and i think that uh we're in in terms
of partnering and looking with our
working with our partners
um the safety is of utmost concern and
01h 45m 00s
so they've been
really great in terms of learning about
rssl and some of those uh some of those
uh regulations that we're working on and
also you know kind of asking a lot of
questions so it's it's been really
good in that in that way and i think we
also hear
from parents and from young people
uh just really wanting some interaction
and so trying to balance those
those places so i don't know if that
answers the question but that's kind of
what we've been hearing lately
thank you yes it does all right our next
uh one is director moore
um i think i've had most of my
questions answered one way or another um
so i guess i'll take my two minutes to
uh thank all the staff
for um the extraordinary work that's
gone into
developing all of these plans um it has
been a very very long
long uh what 15 months now
um and it's not over yet um
and anybody who's been paying attention
knows i've been
pretty conservative um around
reopening plans and and wanting to make
sure that we're
dotting all the eyes and crossing all
the t's for for health and safety
and and i am for whatever it's worth
i am now satisfied that um the district
has done
everything humanly possible to to make
um schools safe learning environments
for both students and staff and for
their families
and um and i i just want to thank
everybody for
the countless hours endless work
the uh the angst and the
you know the constant burden of this
ever-evolving situation
so thank you all and um
i'm looking forward to i'm looking
forward to the
successful conclusion of this school
year and
um some really fun activities for
students over the summer
and then a a next school year
that will approach
normality it won't be it'll be a new
normal
but i i think with the plans that are
happening
um i'm confident that
that will be able to provide um a school
year for
students who who are willing and able
to attend in person um anyway
thank you i i only have a small glimmer
of
the work that's been done in order to
make all of this happen
and um i am tired just contemplating the
little bit that i know
so thank you
director bram edwards did you have a
question or comment
julia you're muted
following dan's footsteps
i have about a comment and a um
question uh just the comment is just
thank you
to the the staff who've gotten us to
where we are um
and i was really excited to hear that
the preliminary work
um and then i wanted i'm gonna go back
to the slides that dan had on the screen
um and the comments they made um so i
just wanted to
clarify that 80
and i know this is a rough estimate
roughly 80 percent of the classrooms
would hold the students even if we had
the three foot
is that correct even if we had the three
foot rule
what we did is the model we were able to
run or
it's a couple different programs that
have to match up so that was able to
match up
eighty percent of the classrooms pretty
easily so another twenty percent we
haven't looked
at yet it's for the three foot standard
i mean right right
and so so with what we were able to
model it was a relatively low percentage
that came up with
with that would have capacity concerns
so on in on an individual classroom
basis and that's with assumptions of
the three-foot distancing and also
making assumptions because sometimes you
know not all
uh classrooms are the same shape and
they're not all the same configuration
so
we're making assumptions around how much
usable space is in there
uh what circulation is necessary uh
and some assumptions around the fixtures
and the furnishings that are in the room
but with those assumptions that put in
place it was a relatively low percentage
of classrooms that we saw
capacity issues and now the intention is
to take that to the next level start
01h 50m 00s
looking at those individual rooms
and in confirming if we do have issues
and what those solutions might be
because one of the
issues this spring as we talked about it
it
it was just sort of operationalizing
getting kids back in the in the hybrid
model
so and i know later on this evening
we're going to have be talking about the
resolution which has
sort of continuous updates coming
as you look at the the work and i know
it's always as you get to the smaller
number
it actually gets more difficult like the
few remaining ones
um do you
pers do you anticipate that that last
20 percent and then the the spaces that
director
um bailey referenced which is the more
communal type spaces
that by you know mid-june we'd
we'd have that whether we could operate
in sort of the most
maybe the most restrictive environment
of the three-foot
requirements right as we progress and
certainly as we get into june i think
we're going to have a much better idea
of what the constraints will be and we
know we're going to have to be creative
we were creative
with how we put together a hybrid and
we're able to make all the
schools work and we're gonna have to be
creative uh
doing this again uh i i can say that
we're
you know the planning uh we're making
decisions and assumptions now and we're
going to have to
update those assumptions as we go along
we've already purchased some furniture
with the anticipation of this
for coming for fall because furniture
has led lead times
and so we're going to continue to be
doing that and looking at
what exactly our overall capacity
concerns me
thank you and sorry about the phone call
my mom was calling me
um great thank you
um so that's really heartening to hear
that there may
be a cell from the facilities and then
my second question
was and i'm just going to ask the i
think the
superintendent this one it's a more
generic question
is we're not going to survey parents
again we're going
about we're just planning
we're opening schools in the fall and if
people are going to opt in to cd into
comprehensive distance learning
that would be an opt-in but it's not
going to be this what you know
which one are you going to pick is that
correct
well that's one of the assumptions here
i think dan just to confirm
you're you're looking at our physical
spaces
assuming 100 of our enrollment returns
to campus right
so we don't know if that's in fact going
to be true
so we have our team often offline right
now
designing our virtual school option
we're going to want to offer families a
really crisp
description of what they could expect if
they feel
that that's an option or a choice they
need to exercise
what i don't know and the staff you know
we have to figure out is that five
percent of our enrollment is that 15
of our enrollment so we're going to have
to get an idea
of what that is uh and so there we will
likely come back and describe what our
thinking has been around well how do we
register students for
a virtual school option if for whatever
reason families
need to exercise that choice that'll
decrease
the number of students that we need to
accommodate
in person and so when you think about
that last 20 of spaces
look we knew moving from six to three we
could make six feet worked and three
feet should
generally work for a full day but if we
have another
set of students who aren't even planning
to come to campus that might even
reconcile or resolve
uh the remaining space concern or
constraint
so this is part of our punch list of
next items and variables that we have to
sort through
um and and that will keep directors
updated on
yeah and on that note uh uh director
prime edwards we will uh come back and
provide an update on how
we plan to uh to get that type of
information from our parent community
great thank you
okay our uh next person uh director
bailey
um thanks and julia that was my question
as well
how are we gonna anticipate um so i'm
glad
glad that got posed i just want to say
in
again observing schools today
saw kids doing all the the right safety
things
staying apart wearing masks doing the
hand wash
i saw a child coming in late who didn't
have a mask but
knew there was the mask dispensary right
there inside the door
01h 55m 00s
along with the hand sanitizer
so um our kids are
totally into this i've heard nothing but
praise about
um when we've had students identified
with covid
for how that's been handled and
communicated
and so there's been at least no known
cases of
any kind of in-school transmission it's
all been something out in the community
that came
in um our teacher leaders have been very
very happy with uh our protocols around
that
so this this seems to be working really
well
uh so it it sounds like we
are really lined up to
open up fully whether it's three feet or
zero feet
um in the fall um unless there's some
kind of
spike in where the state orders us back
into cdl
um i think it's pretty clear that's
where we're headed that's where all the
planning is
[Music]
so this is really good news going
forward
all right thank you director bailey
director constance
i think i've had my questions answered
uh i want to thank dan young for putting
up with me for the last probably two
months
with this very question and i just think
it's really helpful to
have this clarity for the community
tonight
um and to just be able to build
excitement for
for going back to school um it's a lot
of work that has
has built this foundation um but it's
just
really exciting and and i'm really
excited for the summer offerings that
are going to be
in some cases our test case for how we
how we go back to school and also
some of our students will be taking part
in some of our summer activities i've
never been to school before
so um it's just exciting thanks for all
the underlying work thanks for the
research so that we could really
clearly answer this question because it
needed to be answered
so thank you again
student representative did you have a
question or comment come to you in
in this time uh yes thank you
uh so we have a number of schools that
ordinarily have
low vaccine rates which will probably be
lower
with the copen 19 vaccines so what will
we do
in the event that in general it is safe
to more or less return
to school as usual but
at the same time there are a number of
our sites that have not yet
crossed the whole immunity threshold
sooner representative shu that's a great
question we will take that back to our
public our health panel um to inquire
and have a a
conference or a response to you via
email
and can you copy everyone on that
response i'd be interested
um you know we have exclusion for you
know
not completing certain vaccinations for
kids
i'd be really interested in hearing the
uh your response as well
yes director to pass we will uh include
an entire board on uh
this communication chair lowry uh
if i could ask one one question uh again
not necessarily the answer tonight but
would want to hear the answer at some
point uh
we we've talked a lot about lessons
learned
from virtual
learning that there's some positive
takeaways
from that do we have a plan
for engaging with our teachers to like
fully flesh out that discussion
um to have a really
inclusive discussion of lessons learned
and not only teachers but our eas
all our staff in schools and then to
formulate that
as to how can that be part of our
ongoing school improvement plans going
forward
thank you director bailey for the
question uh we will uh
uh one of our upcoming uh updates uh i
will provide a little bit more
about uh our our plans for
uh distant learning uh in the fall
and i'll i'll make sure that our staff
includes
[Music]
some information on how we're engaging
with our educators as we
design and plan uh that moving forward
and actually what i meant was taking
what worked in distance learning that we
can do with
in-person learning oh understood got it
but but actually that's making our
our virtual learning better as well is
02h 00m 00s
is also
also good things so uh thank you for
expanding expanding my question and
doubling your workload
excellent all right um we are i'm going
to take a brief five-minute break we'll
be back at 8 15
um and we will then uh move to our
resolution
uh to prepare for full-time reopening of
in-person learning for the 21-22 school
year
all right see you back in five minutes
everyone
[Music]
and i've heard others as well so i think
it's just important to always come back
and
recognize um how difficult the situation
it is and and yet also you know
um how much how many of the successes we
we have had
my reason for bringing this resolution
forward um tonight it's really threefold
um
you know as as we heard tonight right
from the superintendent and staff as the
district prepares for full-time
in-person reopening this fall i want to
say that again for the oregonian
we're preparing for full-time in-person
reopening this fall um
i want to make sure the superintendent
has the full support of the board to
take
the necessary actions that he needs to
take to get us back to full-time
in-person reopening um
you know some of the commentators um
commenters you know said earlier tonight
um we need to do what it takes to get
schools reopen this fall even
even if we have to do some under under
current health guidelines um and i want
to make sure the superintendent has the
full
support of the board um in taking those
actions you know over the next few
months
the second reason um i think it's
important to send a clear signal to the
community that we're working hard
towards a full reopening
um the superintendent said this a few
weeks ago i think he was very clear
about that
um but again those messages get modeled
over time and i think it's important for
the board and his board members to
really amplify that message to the
community as well
um and then third and i think the most
important reason that i'm bringing it
forward is really to start a community
conversation
about what that return is going to look
like and
02h 05m 00s
it will give families time our whole
community time to sort of consider
um what it's going to look like and
whether and how it will work for them
um and i think it also allows us as a
district to start talking about some of
the
potential barriers and we began to hear
about that tonight right i mean
we know district staff know um space
limitations but being able to
be transparent about that and and sort
of elevate and expose those issues of
you know what is what does that mean
and even if even if 95 of our classrooms
can hold students
um at three feet well that means five
percent of our classrooms can't so so
what are we going to be doing you know
in those situations you know to
accommodate for that i think it's
important to be having that
um that conversation um and
you know i'm i'm really confident that
schools are going to be fully open in
the fall
um but it it still may look different
and there are things that may be
different about it and
i want to make sure we're bringing the
community along um in that conversation
between now and and september 1. um show
our work
um listen to feedback and and i think
that's the the right way to get to a
successful reopening
um and i really liked um how uh how the
superintendent
or you know the slide deck presented it
you know
let's just keep talking about what do we
know and and and what don't we know
um and let's be really clear about that
as we go forward
so all that i won't go through the
entire resolution um there are a number
of sort of recitals that talk about you
know
um where we are and how we got there um
in terms of the resolved just um
just to for a little you know bit of
clarity and process this did
um you know come up um i've been working
on it for a little while unfortunately i
didn't get it around until the
to the board other board members until
um um late on
friday um and so uh as a result
and and i did get a little bit of
feedback and i'm gonna walk through some
of those things that are incorporated
here but i did ask chair lowry
um to go ahead and keep this on the
agenda for discussion tonight
but then delay a vote for another couple
weeks because in addition not getting to
the board
it wasn't publicly um released until
just yesterday i believe so
this gives us time to continue to
consider it take any um comments we
might hear
um if any come forward um you know from
the community over the next couple weeks
and
and take the action and i i i think
given what we've heard
tonight about the reopening plans um you
know
again i don't think there's i don't
think there's an urgent need um to
demonstrate to the public that we're
moving in that direction because i think
that's clear i i think the need really
is to demonstrate that the board is
fully behind
um the superintendent of the district on
this so so in terms of the resolved um
that's what it says right it says that
we commit to partnering with the
superintendent to find the solutions
that allow for a return to full-time
five-day week-in-person instruction
um you know safety uh um the pbs's board
top priority is to safely reopen
and we understand that we also do have
to adhere to state and federal
guidelines and take any
other appropriate steps that are needed
to mitigate transmission of of coping
19.
um given the uncertainty around that
you know the board is directing the
superintendent to develop a
comprehensive plan for returning to
in-person schooling that transitions
students back in a safe and equitable
manner
um and then update us as as he's
committed to do uh regularly as
as as we go through this given that we
may not get that state guidance until
july which
i will agree is is really absurdly late
but it's what we have to live
with um regardless of the conditions for
returning in person you know i
we are directing the superintendent to
provide a comprehensive virtual learning
option
for students and families who are
unwilling or unable to return
i think there's a really interesting
question about how long that continues
and i know some members of our community
you know have said well why why would we
even need to provide that
i think given where we are and where we
expect to be and
given vaccination rates and what they're
expected to be i think it's really
important that we provide this option
um to our families and and what's noted
in the resolution is we'll provide
a virtual learning option at least until
code 19 vaccines
um are widely accessible to school-aged
children so
um you know we could continue to choose
to do so longer but but that's sort of
the minimum
um until the vaccines are widely
accessible to school-age children and
and that is going to be some time um you
know again we just got 12 and up
it's gonna be some time to get to get
younger kids um
this is a new addition and this was
actually a suggestion of
um director moore and also from um um
uh portland association of teachers um
the sort of idea about what are we doing
around vaccines and
and we're already doing this work but i
thought it was really important to
include it in here um again the
the board's sort of sort of seconding
what we heard from staff today
um you know to facilitate accessibility
and uptake of vaccines
um especially in our most impacted
communities you know we're directing the
superintendent to continue
as he and his staff are working with oha
multnomah county mesd
and other community partners to educate
students and families about vaccine
safety
and improve distribution systems
including the potential use of schools
as vaccination sites
there are some hurdles to that but also
some some real advantages
so um i know it sounds tonight like
everyone's pretty interested in
in seeing if that's a possibility and
then um finally just
just you know recognizing um the
significant impact that educational
disruptions have
on student academic social and emotional
well-being um you know encouraging the
02h 10m 00s
governor
oha ode to revisit the ready school safe
learners guidelines
just to make sure they reflect the
current state of knowledge about disease
transmission
they adjust to progress in vaccine
intake and they accommodate the
complexity of plan and implementation
in large urban districts we all want to
be safe we all want the
you know to to abide by public health
guidelines that keep us safe
we don't want public health guidelines
that that have very limited added value
but also make it very very difficult for
our kids to be back in person
full time um so that's kind of what that
last piece is about
um so with that i know we already had a
long conversation about reopening so i'm
not sure how much more there is but i
think if anybody has specific comments
about the resolution
now's the time and then we can also uh
make any needed amendments um
uh in a couple weeks if if necessary i
was gonna have us run through
uh alphabetical by first name uh in
reverse order that's
you know mix it up so oh i don't i
thought i was gonna go first geez i was
ready to go
we're sorry we're gonna start with scott
amy you get to be last i'm sorry
oh that's a switch yeah the old guy gets
to go first
not the oldest um the age before beauty
yeah and pearls before uh so uh director
scott thank you
uh for bringing this forward um and
and just to kind of repeat what i you
know after
it took me a while to think this thing
through partly in how we
engaged around it which was a really i
think
uh interesting process uh but coming to
the point now where
it to me we've got two options for
september either we're going to be open
at three feet
or less or you know we're going to have
a covet disaster and be back to complete
cdl
so i see that we are on the path going
forward to three feet
i want to totally support the work of
staff
in getting there
[Music]
seeing both our kids and our teachers
today
really engaged in learning at the three
schools i was at some really
great engaging lessons going on kids
excited to be there
and also seeing hearing from our
principals that
those kids who and you know roughly a
dozen
kids at a school who weren't engaged
very well in cdl almost all those kids
are
in person and our families are really
responding positively
to summer programs which is exactly what
we
want to hear for those kids who were at
least engaged to get them involved now
and then
into the summer i'm i'm really excited
to see this as a pivot point for us
going forward
and i want to thank the superintendent
for his leadership in this
and you know everything we've heard
tonight we've seen his leadership
through his staff leading in racial
equity
and i just totally appreciate that
in our budget in our summer programs
music really uh ex and
art expanding uh where it's been
least offered before
and we the kindergarten transition
program
which again reaches uh usually our our
lowest
income our uh african-american children
native american children
other children of color all those things
i see that he has led us going forward
in
so i just want to appreciate all the
work of
staff and his leadership going forward
director moore
um i don't think i've much to say about
this resolution
i think i've already kind of said my
piece about reopening um
i guess the only thing i would want to
underscore
is the need for
continued collaboration
with state and local partners
and that includes getting
[Music]
getting guidelines from the states as
as soon as possible in order to
um in order to allow maximum time
um for you know the kind of really
comprehensive planning
that is going to be necessary in order
to um
in order to have a a smooth reopening
in in september um
so i i i'm thank you director scott for
taking a lead on this
02h 15m 00s
um i think this i think it's a good
resolution
so thank you
all right nathaniel do you have any um
comments or questions
i do not have any questions about the
resolution thank you
director depos
i wanna excuse me i to thank um director
scott for
initiating this resolution um i agree
with you that it's
really important for us to show the
superintendent
um our our intent and to support him in
his efforts
um and yeah i think it's great i think
also allowing a couple more weeks
for it to be fine-tuned is great um as
you know there's
lots of information coming in things
change every day so
um by the time we actually do get to
vote on this i think it'll be a really
nice product
director bryn edwards
thank you um so
um thanks director scott for your
leadership on this
um i view this as really a statement of
the district's leadership together
making a commitment to our families of
what's going to happen this fall
i know lots of families whether it's
people returning to work or making
child care arrangements or wanting to
you know make sure that their child who
is most successful
in the classroom is going to be
returning
under school that knowing that there
is a united commitment to making this
happen
i think is really important and
um you know last
at last week's meeting um the the more
in
the intent of my question was more to
get at um
making sure that the budget had whatever
staff needed in order to be able to
um successfully re reopen
and so the the intent was
and i hope that i when as i look through
this i'm not
sure this point's quite captured but
that just the commitment that will do
what it takes
and i know that there's some some
scenarios that
uh we may not have the resources for um
but we want to make sure that um staff
has the budget flexibility to do things
uh when i was in franklin
um recently the
uh there were clearly some like walls
have been moved and things that have
been changed in order to be able to
accommodate
even the hybrid model um
so i think
part of what i'm thinking is making sure
that there's sort of in addition to
the the commitment from the board but
also you know what are the resources
that the district needs in order to be
able to successfully open um so i want
to make sure that's captured there
i think one thing i want to ask the
board to consider
is potentially a separate resolution or
communication
to um
to the governor the health authority and
the oregon department of education
i think the the language is very
diplomatic director scott that we're you
know encouraging
um the the governor and the health
authority and the department of
education to revisit them as condition
changes i think we should be
um a little more assertive
and communicate what we need as a large
district so portland's very different
from
other other districts just that we're
you know
most districts in the state of oregon
199
are much smaller and to turn the ship
around
it takes a lot more and so i would hope
that
um maybe we could have a communication
to the state about
um what we need to see from them
and again i don't know why they picked
the 19th but it it may work for smaller
districts but
i think it would be very hard for pbs to
turn that ship
so that would be something else that i
would be
interested in in the resolution
um but i think it accomplishes its
purpose of sending
the right the right message of um we
intend to
move move ahead and i think continuing
the conversation as you said
uh director scott to show our work so
that
um it's really transparent so parents
you know i know because i'm getting lots
of questions every day from people of
just like
how it's going to work because people
are trying to figure out their lives
um sort of post pandemic or as they're
getting vaccinated
and i think the more that we can
communicate just the better and i think
this is a great
02h 20m 00s
first start and a first start that's
aligned with um the superintendent's
staff
all right amy director com sam
thank you um yeah
just thank you to andrew for bringing
this forward also just generally for
your leadership
and partnership on this issue for a long
time
even when the road was very bumpy
but i think that in the absence of a
strong statement
from the board and strong
analysis and communication from the
district which we heard tonight
um a lot of worry and concern and
questions
kind of started to take root in the
community so i think it's really
important for us to just
be really clear about our intentions
and then also to agitate
on the factors that are outside of our
control but
on which we have influence meaning the
ready school safe learners guidelines
probably and
other decisions um coming down or
potentially coming down from the state
we have an important voice and role and
important perspective so
i'm glad to hear some of my other board
colleagues um
recognize that and be willing to
be willing to advocate for what we
believe is right for our students but
um andrew thank you again i look forward
to voting on this
supporting this and hopefully easing
easing a bit of the worrying burden from
our families
all right uh we will vote on this
resolution at the next board meeting on
may 25th all right we come now to
something that i've had to do a lot of
studying on um
something uh kind of outside my normal
wheelhouse
as we turn to some of the financial
decisions that we make
as a board superintendent de gerar would
you like to introduce the next item
which is the pers obligation funds
well that's a switching gears chair
uh and and consistent with the
onboarding process here in pps
are new uh you don't get really get
called new after 30 days but
our chief financial officer in alberto
delgadillo
who's going to talk to us on this topic
of
limited tax pension bonds
and i know we're being joined tonight by
as usual our esteemed guest carol
samuels and company as well
thank you cara for doing the work of
teleporting everyone in and
the meeting and trying to you know spin
all the plates
all at once we really appreciate you
yeah thank you good evening i was like
they're talking about me and i can't
interject so but now i'm here good
evening
chair laurie and directors uh yes
definitely switching gears and student
representative shu
uh for tonight want to engage in a
discussion uh regarding pension
obligation bonds
i think the current low interest rates
make it ideal to consider
issuing a pension obligation bond but
there are also risks to be considered
so to help guide our conversation to
further understand the benefits
and risk i like to do i'd like to
introduce three of our guests
that are here we have
uh gogon agar and i and my apologies
gogan if i
mispronounce your name i answered
anything you can imagine
it's like me right i'm alberto
so the first name is accurate it's
golgan and my last name is turkish and
they have silent g
so it's ur i totally get the silent g
thing because i've got the silent dh
on my sisters
i studied german for two years so i have
this familiarization with the um lots
but
you know that the the the g was i
should have looked that up but uh but
yes uh our bond console
and uh we also have uh andrew dyke
from eco northwest who is part of the
team that authored the analysis
to assess the risks and rewards of
issuing the pension obligation bond
and in addition as as superintendent
guerrero mentioned earlier we have carol
samuels
who you all know very well and so
for kicking it off i'm going to turn it
over to carol
to walk us through the risk and rewards
conversation in addition we have a
02h 25m 00s
deck that we want to share so
carol take it away
great well good evening
everybody it's nice to see all of you
hopefully
next time it will be in person
um what i have
in front of you here is a very
abbreviated
version of the deck that you should have
in your
board packet and my hope is
that this will be a quick review
but this is a very complicated
subject so please feel free to ask
any and all questions that come to mind
as i go through it and i'll also be
asking andrew from echo northwest to go
over
some key slides that are relevant to
this discussion
so if we could turn to the first slide
believe yeah
there we go okay so
why are we having this conversation at
all
well frankly the reason
is that the oregon pension system
is still substantially underfunded
which means that your rates and charges
associated with your pension costs are
still
quite high and pension bonds
can be a tool that can help
reduce those costs so the concept can
get
pretty muddy but in fact it's actually
fairly
straightforward essentially the goal
is to borrow at very low interest rates
take the money send it to pers
pers has an 80 billion dollar portfolio
which they invest across the investing
spectrum and the goal would be
that once those funds are invested
the bond proceeds that they would
hopefully
return a rate that was higher
than the borrowing rate so let me say
that again because it's actually
the simplest concept of all the things
we're going to talk about tonight
the goal is to borrow at a lower
interest rate
than the investment returns on those
funds would generate that profit
or arbitrage would be used to reduce
your overall
pension costs so
there's a lot of lingo here pers
has a system of side accounts you may
have had a conversation
about that last year when there was a
proposal that was adopted to submit some
cash
into a site account a site account is
just a fancy name for a savings account
whereby pers is retaining it
on your behalf and comes up with a
draw down or amortization schedule
that lasts for 20 years where a certain
amount
is drawn out each year and is used as an
offset to what you otherwise would
pay that offset is known as a
rate credit
unlike with your general obligation bond
program
since this is not for a capital purpose
under federal tax law the only way you
can borrow for this is on
a taxable basis so your geo bonds can be
sold
at a tax exempt rate and i see everybody
has a cat
in this i have one sleeping next to me
right now
in any case uh because these aren't for
buildings and facilities
the feds won't let you borrow on a
tax-exempt basis which is fine you can
borrow on a taxable basis
but it makes the interest rate somewhat
higher
next slide please
so hopefully you can see some of these
numbers uh if you can't as i said before
they are in your packet but
portland has had a very successful
track record and history of using
pension obligation bonds to reduce your
costs
in the upper box you'll see that the
district
02h 30m 00s
borrowed three times two of which were
new money the third was a small
refinancing of the 2002
debt where you borrowed approximately
half a billion dollars
so 500 million dollars at interest rates
ranging from
5.6 percent on the 2002s
to 5.73 percent
on the 2003s and again a small
portion was refinanced in 2012.
those funds were deposited
into a site account you can see
the deposit on the lower left
and hopefully you can see that it grew
steadily over time because your timing
could not have been better in the middle
you can see the investment returns that
were experienced from 2004
through and including 2019
and even though in today's market
borrowing at
five and a half percent or higher
would be considered quite expensive
relative to your rate of return you've
done remarkably well
in the lower right you can see a column
labeled pension bond
savings and the overall
total reduction savings
being translated into a reduction in
personnel costs
is over 280 million dollars in total
and on a present value basis about 184
million dollars so all has gone
remarkably well for this
setup next slide
furthermore we've run projections
of what is potentially going to happen
in the remaining seven years of these
bond issues
both of which expire in fiscal year
2028 and again if you look at the lower
right
you'll see that the expectation based
upon an assumption
that the fund earns you can see in the
middle
what the pers model assumes
which is a 7.2 rate of return
each and every year which we know is not
going to happen but
from our perspective this is as good of
a model
as we're going to get for now um
but assuming you earn something
approaching
7.2 percent in the next seven years
you stand to save an additional 180
plus million dollars so
all things being equal this is a risky
thing to do
but as i've said to several of you i
think we all have
jim scherzinger to help to thank
because it was on his watch
that the district made the decision to
move ahead
on this basis next slide
so why might now
be a good time to think about doing this
again
well i'm sure you've seen in your own
personal lives as you
refinance your mortgages or take out
loans
for remodeling or cars or
the district's go bonds that interest
rates are
truly at historic lows this is
a graph that looks in the period between
1996
and today and you can see that interest
rates
you can see this more clearly in the
inside box
have started to creep up this year
based upon some concerns
about inflation um
but even with that creep up they are
still
at historic lows and you can kind of see
where we were back in 2002 and 2003
relative to where we are now we are
currently
projecting that for a 20-year bond issue
you could borrow at approximately three
and a half
percent next slide
so i think it's super super important
that
everybody here understand that
this is not like any other financing
you're ever likely to consider
in your capacity as a public official
02h 35m 00s
in that there is absolutely no guarantee
this is going to work out well as i said
the sound bite
is can you make more
on the invested bond proceeds than
you're
spending on the borrowing
and the interest and the answer is if
you think you can
if returns are going to exceed the
borrowing rate
then the likelihood is
you are going to put yourself in a
better situation
if returns equal the borrowing rate
then at least you have not put yourself
further behind
but in the case where returns are
below the borrowing rate you could
put yourself in a worse position
than if you had done nothing and i've
worked on
quite a few pension bonds since 2002
and you know i sleep well at night
because i know
that most of the folks i've worked with
have done
really really well portland at the top
of the list
but there was a group in 2007
who borrowed right before the 2008 crash
and they are still in the hole
and we don't project they are ever going
to climb out of that particular hole
if you assume the same model assumption
of a 7.2
return with that
i'm going to turn it over to andrew at
echo northwest because
the district did contract with echo
northwest
to run an analysis beyond my
expertise which is on the borrowing side
to look at the probability of success
on the investing side so andrew are you
on i am on thank you carol um so
next slide and i will talk which i will
talk about
so i do want to clarify too carol
mentioned that we contracted with pps we
actually
pps was part of a group of nearly two
dozen school districts that
participated in and was interested in
this particular analysis
um and the results obviously don't
depend on the group of districts
that are funding the report could have
been pps by itself but of any other
group of districts
so there was a large consortium that was
interested in this question and that are
pursuing
an interest in evaluating the risks and
rewards of
issuing pension obligation bonds i do
also want to say that
i and eco northwest are independent
third party here this analysis is
designed to support the decision-making
process but we have no
no vested interest in the bond sale
itself so i just wanted to put that out
there
there's a lot of words in the slide and
a small number of numbers
but what you're looking at are high
level
findings from our analysis we conduct an
initial analysis of the potential
um rewards and risks of issuing pension
obligation bonds in january
and the results of that are displayed in
the dark blue filled in bars
in the chart and we just spent a minute
on those so that you understand what
you're looking at and then we'll talk
about the update
um so we're looking at different rates
of bond issuance along the bottom 2.5
3.5 4.5 percent and
the dark blue bars are the output or one
of the outputs
of our modeling um where we estimate the
risk
or the probability of a successful bond
issue where the returns are greater
than the costs of the bonds and you can
see not surprisingly as you move
from a low interest rate to a higher
interest rate
the probability of success declines in
our initial analysis for the scenarios
we modeled
um the probability of success was a high
of 95 percent
for the rate of 2.5 down to about 80
for that higher rate scenario and that
was supposed to be the end of the story
um as it turns out in march
um some new information was released and
specifically uh millerman the first
system actuary presented
to the pers board some less favorable
market
uh financial market outlooks um and that
that outlook was
less favorable suggesting um annual
returns of about 0.75 percentage points
lower year by year than they miliman had
projected in december
and lower by a similar magnitude
compared to the projections that we rely
on our
model and what we put into our model is
based on
treasury projections um and we think
that's the best information for this
kind of analysis
they have the most intimate knowledge of
the pers portfolio
unfortunately they have not revised
their projections we expect
they will release new market projections
02h 40m 00s
in june
uh we expect a directional change that's
similar that is
the mark of outlet will be less
optimistic we don't know how
less optimistic we'll be we don't know
the magnitude of that change
but hearing this new information there
was understandable interest in
getting an update of our analysis we
unfortunately cannot do a full update
because we do not have the updated
treasury outlook and the miliman
information is not sufficient to run an
update
so what we recommended and ultimately
implemented and you'll see
displayed in the outline bars is an
alternative approach
that approximates the impact on the
probability of success
of deteriorated market conditions
so specifically what we suggest is
suppose you're looking at a rate of bond
issue of 4.5
what we did was keep our old market
outlook
but run a scenario at a higher interest
rate specifically 5.5 percent
and the results of that scenario
modeling
should approximate what you would expect
to see
if you ran a scenario with a model that
had been updated with a new set of
financial projections
at a bond rate of 4.5 percent
um and that the um
the market projections would be if
they're lower
for anticipating an annual return that's
about one percentage point lower
than prior then we're putting a similar
kind of squeeze in the potential reward
so again based on our initial model if
you were anticipating a
bond rate of 4.5 percent you would want
to look to the results for a bond rate
of 5.5 percent
to approximate what would happen if
market conditions were such that returns
were about a percentage point lower than
uh previously anticipated um
and that's what we're showing in the
outline bars we're kind of shifting the
results over
to the to the left and you can see
that the probability of success has
declined somewhat at the
initial rate of 2.5 percent
we're predicting a probability of
success of about nine and ten almost
ninety percent chance and that declines
to about 67 percent or two-thirds
probability of success at an interest
rate of
4.5 um
so so that's the results and i will say
a couple more things before turning it
back over to carol
one is that this is these new results
are potentially slightly less optimistic
than might be warranted by the
information from millman
um again their market returns
anticipated going forward we're about
three quarters of a percentage point
lower than initially anticipated we're
presenting results that
are consistent roughly with returns that
are one percentage point lower
on average at the same time
again we believe that the treasury has
the best information
and that their projections are going to
be the best guy as to the future
returns of the portfolio and we don't
know where that's going to land
we have to wait till june to find that
out
so with that i will turn it back to
carol
well before we move further i know there
were a lot of questions on
the echo northwest's information so let
me
just pause all right let's run down
i'm gonna just run down the list and see
who has questions amy do you have any
questions about this
well chair lowry did everyone on the
board have the opportunity to
have the individual or small group
briefing on the same information
yes we all have that opportunity i was
not i was not able to take advantage of
it but
um heard from other board colleagues and
got some fill in
okay and i wasn't either i jumped on the
call today but had over
um double booked myself so i haven't
also got the benefit of that smaller
group
learning and we will we are not voting
on this tonight so we will have some
time before the vote so
perhaps michelle there could be a window
to have that happen maybe we can check
with roseanne
okay um mr dyke i appreciate having you
here and thank you for that
bit of a deeper dive um we had a pretty
i had a pretty extensive conversation
the other day and um
i believe most of my questions were um
sufficiently answered so thank you
great you're welcome andrew did you have
something
no just thank you you're welcome oh no i
met andrew scott sorry oh i'm sorry i'm
sorry
i should have said director scott i
apologize that was super confusing
we often get confused ourselves between
andrew scott and scott bailey so
it's commonplace around here okay when
when carol when carol opened up and she
said she was gonna ask andrew to walk
02h 45m 00s
through some of the slides
wait a minute i didn't sign up for that
i don't know all right we can although
that would turn out a lot better than if
she said we're going to have amy walk
through these things
double scouting when we accidentally
email both aunt both andrew scott
and scott bailey um when you only mean
to email one of you but accidentally
email both that's called the double
scouting just
right i uh no i don't have specific
questions i really appreciate it i
appreciate the the the the presentation
so far and the clarity carol
um you bring to the issue uh you know
because it is
it is unlike almost anything else we'll
do i i do have
this is maybe more for i don't know if
we're gonna keep doing a little bit more
presentation but for the resolution
there is a an important thing i'd like
to talk about with the board in terms of
that maximum percentage rate
which relates right very directly back
to this so so if board members have
have seen in our resolution there is a
there is a maximum interest rate that we
um as a board are authorizing the the
bonds to be issued and right now that
that is set at four and a half percent
i think that's worth having a
conversation about particularly given
given these findings um i i will just
tell you personally i'm far more
comfortable at three and a half than at
four and a half
you know at four out of five um times it
turning out well then two out of three
um so i think that is that is maybe
worth a conversation as important well
and
andrew i just want to piggyback on that
same point
um i understand we have a couple of
things that we need to
to verify in the next few days before we
take a vote
but i had a lot of concerns about
postponing this vote
because we know that that interest rate
is a moving target
and um so the sooner if we are
collectively uh inclined to approve this
the sooner we do it the better
yes and uh you share that with me uh
director konstam and we will
um we're looking at how quickly we can
get those final pieces into place so we
can go ahead and move forward with the
vote we may end up calling a special
meeting
uh to do so but but we have to kind of
finalize the timeline
director broome edwards did you have any
questions at this point
you have a number of questions and i um
so i was part of the uh scherzinger
miracle uh that threaded the needle
um so it's always great to be part of
that um to have a big
um a big plot of money that um
you took a a i calculated an informed
risk on
and it had a good outcome for pbs um
but i also know that in the last 20
years we've
had a fair amount of
just volatility and um
you know uh there's lots of monday
morning quarterbacking uh
when it doesn't come out that same way
so so i think we should do our
full due diligence i don't think that um
we
we haven't had a had a board session on
this before this and i think it's
relatively uh a
material is substantive issue if you're
one of those districts
that are still underwater from 2007
you'll know that like the state stakes
are high so a couple questions i had
unfortunately i
um my questions got pegged to the
longer slide deck um
so there is so i don't
i don't know if you have the i assume
carol you have a
longer slide deck or somebody does
um i do so
so um maybe i don't actually need one of
the slides to ask this question
and i'd like to um
this can be a combined answer from
[Music]
andy um andrew and carol
um but what is the estimate
range so say if we
if this if we're at 67
if we catch that 33 percent
what's the estimated range of the
financial downside
in the worst case scenario
so i'll jump in and carol can uh fill in
if she thinks i've missed anything i
don't have those numbers at my
fingertips but
the broader report that we issued did
provide some additional information
about the distribution of outcomes
um so so the the present value of the
benefits to the bonds at different
interest rates and the distribution the
fifth percent prior value the 95th
percentile value so you can get some
sense of
you know the potential downside at
different points in the distribution if
that makes sense
yeah i'd like to be able to have it
captured in a way like i can tell my mom
what the risk
is like here's potentially what the
range
is um i mean it's a it's a dense
um presentation i've read through the
whole thing but it would be
useful to understand just in lay
person's terms just like we captured the
potential upside
02h 50m 00s
what the potential the range of the
downside is
so we know what that risk could be and
then
then following on what that range could
be
um i'm assuming it depends on
how big you decide to go how how big you
know if you catch the downside
you know how big your downside would be
or what the you know
potentially how big your upside is
yeah i think the the information that in
the report is it's not packaged in a way
that would allow you to
take it right away and give it show it
to your mom or whoever obviously but
um there is some interpretation that we
can add to that average taxpayer
yep yep right that turns it into
statements that along the lines you're
suggesting i think that's that's useful
to do
yeah i think it allows us then to
um to understand the
the risk um and
[Music]
and and how you know how big the swing
is
um actually
yeah i know i just really do mind if i
interrupt for just a second because on
this
on this on this point because actually
one of the things that uh in our
conversation
my conversation with carol um that i
found
really compelling was and i think you
did model out
what if we had the same experience as
those districts that
um issued in 2007 so what if we had a 27
drop next year um and then you know the
same sort of returns that you know
they've seen over the last 13 years
and surprisingly we would still come out
ahead although those districts came out
behind we would come out ahead and the
reason for that is those districts
issued at
five five and a half percent something
along that we're targeting more of a
three and a half you know maybe four
percent
and so and and i don't i'm not saying
any of this to say that we're guaranteed
a good outcome because we're not right i
mean there are still lots of scenarios
um well or maybe one out of every you
know five stairs where
um you know we we we could end up
underwater
but that for me was really sort of
helpful in sort of highlighting why the
district's bringing this forward to
begin with
interest rates where they are right now
and i know you know this julia i'm just
i'm repeating this more just to get it
on the record but yeah
i thought that was a really i thought
that was a really interesting um
analysis in and of itself that that risk
that risk uh stress testing
and also if everyone didn't have a
chance for a briefing if
maybe somebody could show that slide i
do think that that graph is really
compelling
well i'd like i'd like to have it be
able to be captured in a way that we can
explain
explain the risk um because i i'm a i'm
a risk taker but an informed risk taker
and so being able to um
look at like here's the potential upside
i mean obviously any potential upside
has huge impacts
for you know our mission but
so do potential downsides so if the for
the potential downside is actually not
such a big downside
that uh helps inform the risk
so but we need to have people like some
but we can't expect somebody to read
through this and so be able to translate
that into
lay language if
we want to look at that slide that was
actually the next slide
in the abbreviated deck
all right let's let's um i'd like to see
that
um do we want to let everybody else have
a chance to ask a quick question or do
we want to go ahead and move on
because we've got michelle nathaniel
rita and scott and we can go through the
rest of the slides maybe julia and
they'll answer some of your questions
and then we can do more questions at the
end okay
i just um yes that totally works
um i do want to get my questions
answered if
we're going to be voting next week yes
and i you know and i know that we'll
also have time to ask questions offline
as we continue to maybe other
of us get briefings or um continue on so
let's hear quickly from
um michelle did you have a question at
this moment
i i don't right now um my question is
i'd like to get us
a smaller group um
scheduled uh nathaniel did you have any
questions or comments at this juncture
no um i would also very much like to get
a small group leaving scheduled um i was
not
awkward one and i feel like i'm way out
of my
league here so i understand that feeling
all right rita did you have any
questions or comments at this juncture
nope scott
yes um a couple of questions
um and
maybe it's on the slide so it looks like
historically
i'm gonna have a scott i'm gonna have a
stick to what we've seen so far if we
have questions about that and then we'll
finish the rest of the presentation and
02h 55m 00s
then we come back for more questions
does that work can i finish
thank you historically um
it looks like the the two previous pers
bonds
have uh most recently saved us
over 20 million dollars a year is that a
correct interpretation of the far right
hand column
of the earlier slide yeah the
earlier slides showing this historic
uh you have you know
on average potentially i wouldn't say
yeah i would say on average it's
probably a little lower than 20 million
one of the things you'll notice if you
back up to
slide three
not the far right column but the second
one
in that shows the absolute savings
they vary a lot and that is
one other risk factor that i know
staff is well aware of but the board as
well
we need to be prepared to deal with the
fact that because
this is an arbitrage play
where you are basing it on investment
returns since
investment returns vary your site
account
benefit is also going to vary so
having a reserve is prudent
okay yes um
my second question is given the
current assumptions going forward
um let's say we borrow at 3.5
and we get an average rate of return
from pers
that's on schedule
what's our average annual benefit
estimated to be in present value terms
now see that is a perfect segue
to the slide that we were just about to
look at because
i think that was julia's question as
well
if i understood it if you want to hold
off on that one i have
before we go go ahead uh a different
question
this is uh for alberto
is we have an account
if you look at our big fat budget book
that's our
pers account
with i think 40 million dollars
in its 48 million something like that
is that related to any of this
it it is in a way but i will
turn to claire hertz to
add a little bit more detail to it
as she has a lot more experience to help
us
answer that question
thank you yes we do have a pers reserve
that is intended to help
offset um the rates in the case of
a downturn in earnings so that there was
a resolution passed by the board
like and on top of my head i don't
remember what year
but a long time ago with accumulated
funds
in order to help offset and balance
um in case there was a um
you know a bad scenario and that came
forth and it does um the resolution has
us take a certain
small percentage of our property tax
revenue each year and move it into that
re
pers reserve fund okay and i'm seeing
it's uh for those of you who have the
big budget books page 145
and it's actually projected to hit about
58 million
so that's money that is
not it's related to pers and pers risk
in general but it's actually money that
we control it's not in a side account
is that correct it it is um
in our our bank account it's not at
purrs
and it is something that is um
there is a board resolution from years
ago that gives us guidance on
when we accumulate and when we use it
but it's certainly under the board's
control
to determine the use of that fund okay
could we get a copy of that resolution
and uh also your your opinion because
03h 00m 00s
that
i'm not sure how far back that was
uh prior to my time for sure yeah as to
what our strategy if that's
if you agree with that strategy going
forward in terms of how to use that
fund um or in what conditions we would
spend it down
i i believe it's grown quite a bit over
the last decade i agree
certainly we can report back to you on
that i'll work with um
nobody out to um
so that he understands the purpose of
the fund and
we'll report back to you that would be
great
um and then a question for
andrew dyke you ran a bunch of
simulations um
with different things go this way or
that way
or the current way in terms of
investment outcomes
what were the basis of the different
possible outcomes and the odds you
placed on each of those or is it
how did can you give some insight as to
how you constructed that
sure yeah absolutely that's a great
characterization um so
in technical terms what we did was
implement a monte carlo simulation
which um sort of sounds like rolling the
dice and in a high-tech way it kind of
is but
uh just sort of a quick summary of what
that is um
as inputs we take um again the market
outlook
um from the treasury which gives us the
expected or average return for each of
the portfolio
portfolio sorry asset classes in the
portfolio
as well as a major of risk and
specifically the standard deviation of
those returns
and beyond that we also get um i don't
want to get too technical here but we
get
the correlations across asset classes
because you know if you're paying
attention to the stock markets
often when the u.s stock markets go up
the global stock markets will go up and
vice versa not one-to-one but there's a
relationship there so
we take all that information and turn
that into sort of mathematical
distributions of outcomes
um so we can know you know with a
certain probability we're likely to see
something in the range of the average
returns there's also a smaller
probability that we'll see a very high
or very low return for each asset class
and so what we're doing with the monte
carlo simulation is basically taking
random draws of the year by year returns
on the portfolio
um consistent with the assumptions of
the treasury with the market outlook
um and then doing that 20 000 times so
it's sort of like
an experiment again where we're sort of
rolling the dice 20 000 times if you're
rolling the dice once you don't want to
rely on the results but you do it 20 000
times
and the statistics gives you a good
understanding of what's likely to happen
okay um
and you probably can't answer this
question but if you had
rolled the dice 20 000 times the last
time
we were set to go out for a purr's bond
and had the current results today
are we like in line or did we do
better than that expectation
that sort of central tendency
expectation or
do you have any ideas on that and right
have not done that comparison
um and i don't know if we'd be able to
go back far enough to
to you know get the same input numbers
but i think that's certainly a question
i would like to look at
um i think so we don't have an analysis
the performance i think that
the reliability of the output is going
to be
have a similar type of performance as
the treasury's projections and they're
not perfect
um you know again they're going to
change every six months
but it's the best information we have
yeah i will say too though that um right
now there's a
relatively wide spread between the bond
rates that are likely to be seen and
average market returns there's still
risk but there's a widespread there
um and carol can correct me if i'm wrong
in characterizing things this way but
um it's a wider spread than we've seen
um in a long long time if ever and so
um correspondingly we were in our
simulations we're seeing higher
probabilities of success than we've seen
in the past
and you know we have exp sort of
outcomes we've seen most of the pension
obligation bonds have proved positive
some haven't um so it you know
order of magnitude they seem reasonable
all right i'm going to
ask if we can move along to carol's next
slide because we we still have a lot
here with this and then we still got
like
budget i may double back with some
questions offline
thank you we're not going to be voting
on this tonight so we do have some more
time to ask questions so just want us to
to walk that line of making sure we're
03h 05m 00s
getting what we need
publicly but also respecting everyone's
time so carol uh i think we're ready for
that
anxiously wanting to show us yes julia i
just want to make sure before we
move to a different topic that i get a
chance to
at least get to answer that one question
and get my other questions
on the table yeah so what we're going to
do is we are going to
allow the folks here to finish this
presentation
and then if there are still questions at
the end of the presentation we'll do a
quick
run through of everybody and probably
take a quick break and then move on to
our i think i don't know what's next in
the budget but our next item so that
hopefully that gives some time to answer
those questions and then you can also
um submit those questions after this
meeting as well i sent them five days
ago so great
great all right carol we'll turn it over
to this next slide
and then we'll go from there okay so
uh this gets at what several of you
referenced we took
the information and ran some actual
what if scenarios with regard to
what if you borrowed in each case
at three and a half percent and then had
three different investment outcomes
so the first case is
what i'd call the control case it is
exceptionally unlikely to
happen but it reflects the pers
model which is that the fund earns
7.2 each and every year
as i've said to many of you if you
borrow it three and a half and earn
every year
7.2 we know you're gonna make money
and that's what this first column shows
so at the very top you'll see that we
project
if you want to finance the entire amount
that it will come to about 390 million
dollars
we also project that that would
two blocks of information down create
an average percentage break
credit against your current payroll rate
of about seven percent
which once you take into account
the debt as a percentage
of payroll would save you
roughly 1.7 of payroll
each and every year that adds up
to total savings of 179 million dollars
which on a present value basis meaning
what it's worth to you in today's
dollars is about 125 million
but obviously the notion of earning
one rate is ridiculous so
we also move to two
actual cases the second case
being portland's experience where
immediately after issuing bonds
you earned double digit returns for
five years and then the crash of 2008
took place when the fund lost
27 of your of its value
and then it has been recovering ever
since
on that basis this case is even
better which shouldn't surprise us
because
portland is living proof of what happens
when
that occurs and you save
approximately 306 million dollars
or 211 on a present value basis
and roughly 2.8 of your payroll
each and every year
then there's case three which i think
all of us
including me were surprised by
when we first saw it because this is
what you could call the worst case
except it's not the worst case so i want
to emphasize
this is a worse case but i could
definitely
construct a scenario that has far worse
outcomes but nevertheless this is the
real life circumstance that faced
the 2007 borrowers
where immediately they borrowed in the
fall of 2007
within three months the pers fund was
down
by nearly a third of its value
and it recovered from there but
03h 10m 00s
never enough such that the 2007 issuers
have gone into the black yet what this
is showing is that even in this scenario
you would save money approximately 71
million dollars
is that a lot well it's not nothing
um but it's obviously not
anywhere near as much as the other two
scenarios
and it would be perfectly legitimate for
you to say
how is that possible when i have
said consistently that those that
borrowed in 2007 and had exactly these
investment outcomes are still in the red
the main difference you can see at the
bottom of the slide this is what
andrew scott was talking about is that
those who borrowed in 2007
borrowed at a overall interest rate of
5.67
and we're talking about a borrowing rate
here
that's 200 basis points lower
and that makes a huge difference
so uh let me just go on to the next
slide
because it's the last one and it
shows the timeline we're operating on
and then uh happy to answer any
questions
um so i put this together before
i understood that tonight is just
considering the concept i think
the schedule i've heard is potentially
having the board
adopt the resolution at your meeting on
the 25th
if you do that this schedule still works
if it's any later than that then we'd
have to evaluate
the timing overall but this is
working towards a bond sale on
june 30th which would be
it would take place just like all of
your general obligation bond sales where
the
underwriters go through a bidding
process and the lowest
bid interest rate is
the underwriter that is selected
subject again as andrew said
to meeting your maximum borrowing rate
constraint
so if you got into the market and the
market did not cooperate and the bids
came in above the maximum that was set
in the resolution
then the district would not proceed to
complete the sale
the goal would be to have a closing in
the middle of july
send the money to pers and purse
actually
adjust rates pretty much immediately the
first of the month
following the receipt of the funds so
you would start to see
lower payroll rates immediately
and that concludes my
remarks so carol just to be clear
delaying till the 25th does not impact
this timeline correct
correct that's great to know because
that was one of the concerns
all right julia do you wanna um
uh lift up your questions yeah so
um and some of these can be answered in
fact most of them could be answered just
in writing or later or
before the next um well preferably a
couple days before the next board
meeting
and this would be for andrew not andrew
scott
um
so we received a much longer
slide presentation uh
that sort of goes through all the
scenarios the history
a lot of the background the assumptions
um since you're and i know that you did
the sort of monte carlo
simulation on the front end for this
larger this larger group
but since you have um sort of no
or you have an independent look at this
have you gone through
that longer extended deck and are you
comfortable
with the assumptions that have been
made and the scenarios um
that those would be ones that reasonable
people
uh would make yes
yes and you know you can say we look at
it or
the answer is yes yeah assuming it's the
the
final deck that we've prepared yep
yeah it's the it's the big fat one um
okay that was my first question and then
um
03h 15m 00s
on page 10 of the
the big one versus the small shorter one
um there's a list of other risks
um that
it's as
and there are other risks too and then
it lists out um
a series of um four or five other
um scenarios or risks that could be
involved
and i'm interested in again i don't need
to have to have the answer tonight but
what what's the size or the
the scope of of that risk you know the
material um but you're just meant that
the but they're just being mentioned
so if i could address those because uh
that was
a slide deck that i put together um
and for the benefit of others there is
another slide
in your board packet that lists other
risks that i think
fit comfortably under the headline
your rate credit is going to vary
we have already talked about that
briefly but there are a
number of reasons why it might vary at
the very top of the list
is variability in investment rates
it is also exactly that's the one i'm
referring to right and julia it is
hard to quantify the
order of magnitude difference because
there are
so many ingredients that can lead to
variance including how quickly your
payroll
might grow and what happens
to the assumed rate so
it's not something that i think i can
provide a range of outcomes
but i do think you can go back and look
at your own
history and get a sense of how large the
variance
is from that period including the period
of time
where you were growing
less than what the assumption was
in terms of payroll and a period of time
where you had
strong reinvestment and weak
reinvestment
yeah i guess i would appreciate that
um i would be interested in either
staffs or
just so that we have the the um
assumptions and risks pressure tested um
and they may they may come up with the
same answer but
like to have that answered and then
um maybe this is a
question for claire on the payroll
growth trends
do we know what ours are and how those
would be
impacted i mean is that is that an
unknown
we know our degree of um payroll growth
and certainly with the sia investments
and measure 98 investments
it had and now the esser dollars it sure
is
um adding you know variance to that
but certainly it's something that um
we can make sure that we're using our
most up-to-date information about what
we know
is coming in 21 22 and 22-23 at this
point
we did do our forecast that we can add
the
funding that has come in since then um
to help determine
what's um for at least the next few
years what the payroll growth is
expected to be
and then after that we really have to
look at a long-term averaging
um based on um state school fund you
know based on the legislative
allocation to k-12 education in oregon
so claire you're not concerned about
that just given the
change well it's taking a variable so i
i think carol said it best that there
are multiple variables in
this calculation and so what we can do
is take the best information that we
have
and use it to determine the best
path forward in order to do the
investments
in the pay down um you know the debt
service and the pay down distribution
okay and then
um a little bit scarred by 2007
so i'm wondering so that that's the kc
worst case scenario um i don't think
we're gonna have another pandemic
um but i'm
03h 20m 00s
curious carol you said that there were
other scenarios that you could see
that that could get us below 71 million
or
they're worse their worst case scenarios
in different ways
oh for sure uh you know i i
think i was talking to noberto uh
this afternoon where i relayed that
one client quite a while ago asked us
to run
what happened in japan in the 90s when
the nikkei
index went down year after year after
year
believe me i can come up with numbers
that
are scary and negative um
if you assume that we have multiple
years of downturns um
so if you'd like to see that
you know tell me what you'd like us to
run and we can do it
our perspective was that 2008 was pretty
brutal
um and that seemed like a
reasonable example to look at
but i'm certainly willing to run
something scarier
if you'd like to see it
okay
i think can we get get onto our budget
item chair lowry yeah i think
director of our medwars it seems like
that um
there may be some more questions and i'd
encourage you to continue
with those um with i know carol and
claire are available for continued
question answering
um because it seems like you're running
down your list there yeah
well a lot of these questions we went
through in our individual meetings too
including the one
that we had together so i'm just
concerned that we have
our entire budget to get through and
we're not going to be able to
uh you know carol i know you would
valiantly try
but we are not going to be able to um
you know quantify the exact risk but we
all are in possession of the variables
at play here and need to
you know make a a reasoned decision on
that and i think protocols we adopted
tonight the protocols we adopted tonight
is anytime we have a major
item that there's an opportunity to have
a board meeting or a discussion about it
before we actually vote on it so
right and i really appreciate you guys
being able to
answer these questions so i um
will follow up and my i'll claire work
with
you um or roberto um to get them in
but i would like to have them answered
we do have the questions julian look at
the responses to you
we appreciate your interest in the in
you know how complicated the process is
sorry i think my internet is telling me
i'm unstable um
i i okay very nice of your internet
um you know this is a complicated
process this is something that's
newer to me and so i've appreciated all
the questions and all the time
i appreciate the additional time so that
we can bring this back on the 25th
now that we know it won't disrupt the
timeline i think we'll save ourselves
the headache of trying to schedule an
interim meeting
um but go and uh roseanne if you could
reach out to director depos
to see if we can get another briefing
and then uh director bram edwards if you
can work with um deputy hertz
and uh miss samuels and the team uh to
get those finalized questions answered
so that you feel ready to vote on the
25th
deputy hearts did you add i just wanted
to thank
carol samuels golden oor and
andrew dyke for joining us tonight and
answering all of our questions we
appreciate you being with us
to share this um potential opportunity
for the district
thank you you're welcome welcome thank
you all
and for the earlier briefings as well
and for
for really providing a pretty common
sense
um perspective on some really complex
information
all right we are going to go ahead and
move now to another piece of complex
information
the work of the board involves all sorts
of pieces and one of them is enrollment
balancing so we're going to say goodbye
to this group of guests
and i'm going to turn us over to
superintendent guerrero to introduce our
next group of guests
i think that's right another light topic
for the evening
so in a three sentence recap for our
viewing audience
uh as most of you are aware uh last year
we launched an enrollment and program
balancing process
uh receiving technical assistance from
flow analytics to help
the data analysis and modeling and
03h 25m 00s
co-develop community engagement
strategies
and with much help and shared leadership
from a guiding coalition of
representatives from our various school
communities
in february 2020 the board adopted
resolution 6059 a scope of work for a
first phase
of the charge which addressed schools in
the southeast quadrant
of the district due to a high number of
small k to eight neighborhood schools
as well as really the eminent opening of
kellogg middle school which we're
excited to cut the ribbon on
uh so now it's time to move on to phase
two uh so to begin that next phase
we would like to be able to provide that
coalition
a clear charge for its work
and so to to get us into that
conversation
um deputy claire hertz will take it from
here
hello again another light topic as he
said
so um i'd like to introduce the
staff i have joining us today i have
shanice clark
director of community engagement judy
brennan our director of enrollment and
transfer
and esther i'm going to try really hard
esther
a mogbane a regional superintendent and
she'll have to
correct me on i i've been practicing and
i'm still
not perfect esther i'll call you dr oh
that's the best way for me
that was okay um so
i would ask roseanne um
thank you great and if we could go
to the next slide please
and so as we are bringing back
um a charge for phase two um
just wanna share with you
um some of our thinking and lessons
learned
from our um last
phase one process and so
we have two meetings for the board to
first
understand um where we're headed for
where the staff is recommending for
phase two where
what our next steps will be and so this
is the first
discussion evening for our agenda item
and then moving for approval in the
second
um meeting in may and so we're really
looking at middle school students
having access to equitable programming
focusing
on specifically harrison park and lane
middle schools having resources
available to them
with a balanced enrollment and
really making sure that as they have a
balanced
enrollment that opens up opportunities
where they would have additional human
resources available to them
and focus on that equity for
our bypass students experience in
as we balance our southeast portland
middle schools so that would be our
staff recommendation is
at a larger level but i would like to
turn it over now to um judy brennan
um to talk a little bit about the charge
and the scope of work
good evening uh next slide please
so i'm just going to share um a few of
the details of what we
see as essential in this next phase of
work
and of course are here and available if
you have more detailed questions
so um we assembled our team
uh you're meeting the team tonight and
we also um consulted with some
a small number of segc members we took
in some
we folded in some feedback that was
happening with harrison park community
members the principal
um was holding listening sessions for
those groups so
so that all went into the mix now i want
to say we did not roll the dice 20
000 times to come up with an appropriate
scope of work
um but what we kept coming back to again
and again
based on the feedback that you provided
to us on february 22nd
was the importance of opening harrison
park as a middle school
in the 20 to 23 school years you see
that
as the top line um on this scope of work
one thing that we also noticed right
away is that unlike phase one
of segc where we were largely taking
students from k-8 schools
reconfiguring them and offering them the
new kellogg middle school
in this case in order to build
enrollment at harrison park
to be large enough to really stand out
as a middle school
as a pure middle school to others in
southeast
will be needing to reassign areas that
03h 30m 00s
are currently
attached to other middle schools or and
or we probably think it's an and
or um additional programs like dual
language immersion programs
so um that's a difference that we just
need to contemplate as we
begin this phase a couple other things
to point out
um if you'll recall the kellogg building
is physically located in the bridger
boundary but
bridger is not fully assigned
to middle schools at this time part of
the area is administratively assigned
to kellogg the part closest to the
building and the remainder
is um those students are now at will be
attending harrison park
k-8 um next year
and then in a moment i'll just um touch
on um something that we do want to make
sure
um you're aware of and that is that
we've got some enrollment changes coming
that we need to fold into the planning
for this phase
um while the team was working on what
was possible for harrison park we came
again and again
to the importance of lane middle school
so um next slide please
this graph may be the quickest way to
represent
um uh why that's so important for us
we thought it was so important to be a
part of this scope
um so you'll see southeast middle
schools represented here
with harrison park that's the six eight
portion of their current k now what
we're showing you
is the forecast enrollment about five
years from now
and the current enrollment is similar
but you actually we actually see lower
enrollment coming that's because
um as you're probably aware declining
birth rate continued gentrification
we have been seeing lower enrollment
across k-5 schools
and that will be impacting our middle
school enrollment within a few years
you can see the schools with the lowest
enrollment
harrison park the one that isn't yet a
middle school that will need to
to um grow by moving pieces
out of other middle schools but then
there's lane middle school
um with no change below 400
students in 2526
because of concerns about that chronic
low enrollment we'd like
lane middle school to also be a priority
in phase two
and then just one more priority i want
to touch on next slide
thank you um in order for harrison park
to convert
we're also going to have to have a new
home for the harrison park k5
students um in keeping with centering
the bypoc family
needs which we've heard from many of our
bipod community that are
part of harrison park now as well as
honoring that value of keeping cohorts
together which was a really important
part of the final decisions that were
made for phase one
it's going to be important that we look
at returning clark
to a neighborhood school serving the
harrison park community
but that will mean reconfiguring or
relocating the creative science school
it has 450 students and is located in
the clark building now
so that means that even though most of
the k-5 issues in the area that may have
bubbled up in phase one may not be
addressed in phase two
we will have to have some very serious
inquiry and work with a number of
schools
on a solution that would both serve the
harrison park community
and find an appropriate location if
needed for creative science school
that's a really high level um on what
the
the main desired outcomes of phase two
are and i'd love to turn it over to miss
clark
to talk more about the process that's
envisioned
good evening we can move to the next
slide please
uh greetings uh board directors chair
lowry superintendent guerrero
um i am going to touch a little bit
about our
southeast guiding coalition and process
to support
the overall work for phase two um
the thought partnership of our students
and families and community
is is central and thinking about the
recommendation that's ultimately
developed
and we are certainly thinking about
racial equity as it informs how
we are renorming the southeast guiding
coalition and relationship
and partnership with the leaders who
volunteered and dedicate time to this
process
but we definitely recognize that
03h 35m 00s
the solutions that we need to create
need to be creative
and we are really grappling with
complex issues that impact the
day-to-day lives of our students
and the agreements that the southeast
guiding coalition members have
amongst each other as well as the
dialogue
that happens within their meetings is
really
going to be central and and how we think
about
uh holding space for those creative
solutions so
there's a slide here that kind of talks
a little bit about
the both the mindsets and methods
that we want to think about and how uh
racial equity informs the
both voices and approach uh that we uh
value uh essential in this process so
um for example empathy interviews are uh
going to be applied
as we work with
students and families to garner further
input
on what experiences
uh the how their lived experiences
inform our
our next steps uh will will really um
help us
uh uh be grounded and centered with the
storytelling
uh of uh the the voices we
ultimately want to center but i think
the structure
uh that we hold will will also uh
uh be uh thought about like not meeting
uh on a on a weekly cadence uh allowing
uh
two weeks and a little bit of time
for both processing information uh
receiving feedback and questions
and ensuring that our documents
and accessibility of the meetings and
spaces are always translated
and so i think those those are things
that we're wanting to prioritize
and make explicit as we move through the
process and we can move
to the next slide
uh so uh i talked about a racial
equity center design process and there's
gonna be
uh different uh levels that
that we think about to approach the
overall phase two
and so really understanding clarifying
and learning the charge and the scope
of our of our work from the southeastern
coalition
will be essential and also uh having
clarity around the goals
uh and garnering space for questions
uh and uh and consensus
and we will continue to think about
racial equity and social justice
uh as we ground the work and continue
to lift up priorities that are
are elevated from from our members as
well as
gardening specific spaces for for
students that that identify their top
needs
and then those experiences uh with key
topics we really want to use those
things too
uh in the launch and learn uh kind of
space
uh to begin brainstorming uh
brainstorming um solutions and outcomes
that are really in line with
our theory of action and commitment uh
to
uh black and native students and
students of color
and on our next slide uh there uh
will just be some further clarity that
will help us
get to a recommendation
and build consensus uh in in the next
couple of levels
and uh they'll uh will ultimately lead
from the spring and to the
fall quarter if we can move to the next
slide we'll
see a little bit about uh just the last
tail end of the design process uh
where we are holding spaces for
collaboration from community
and input but in a way that uh
will have uh us a second
robust effort um and really
uh draft and test solutions that we are
brainstorming
to build on that recommendation
and on the next slide uh i want to talk
a little bit about methods and the
stakeholders and this particularly
important as
the uh representation of the folks on
the southeast guiding coalition
is something that is uh important and
relevant conversation both students and
and people of color uh families of color
uh having the capacity and ability to
weigh in is
something that we want to be creative
and flexible about
and so uh thinking about increasing
that representation on our guiding
coalition but uh
03h 40m 00s
having uh spaces that also elevate
voices um uh that uh
help us in our decision making as well
and so being in that partnership and
advisory with
our racial equity partners having
dedicated student forums
those are the things that we want to
think about that provide
isolated space phase two
uh for uh inputs uh in our process along
with our open house
and our website and surveys um and uh
trying text messaging
uh so uh these are these are gonna be a
combination of continued and new
strategies that will help reinforce our
rare equity business process
with the key and critical stakeholders
that are essential in this work
and with with that i will pass it
on to esther
good evening board of directors i'm
chair lowry
and superintendent guerrero during phase
one
we heard a lot about um the need to have
voice and representation from our
instructional experts
we do realize that as we redesign our
middle schools and we provide
opportunities for our students
and as we walk towards rolling out phase
two of the southeast guiding coalition
process
it is incredibly important for us to
involve the office of school support
office of school performance um
this is this is important to us because
members in the office of school
performance are
experts in thinking about scheduling
and thinking about programs and then
thinking about the needs of students
we of course work hand in hand with the
office of teaching and learning
to ensure that our schools have strong
instructional programs
and in order to do this and to honor the
expertise
within our ranks the office of school
performance
will have principles at the table each
principal known for their experts
expertise in either master scheduling
program
design student support
both at the district level and at the
site level as well
the district level will of course have
the 30 000 foot level
view which they will share with our site
leaders
and then our site leaders of course will
take that and actualize it at the
schools
we also will be looking at how our
leaders
center our bipark families and provide
supports
for our students while not losing sight
of the day-to-day operation
of the school our central office leaders
will look at
the district's initiatives our
long-range vision our short-range plans
and
our enrollment patterns to determine
what programs and kinds of supports
that will be ideal for our middle
schools as you well know
there are some middle schools right now
that are overcrowded and there are some
that are under enrolled
so the goal here is to balance our
middle schools while at same time
providing
equity amongst the programs and adequate
supports for adolescent minds
the middle school redesign process of
course will continue
and it's a great thing we're starting
with lean and harrison park middle
school because that will be part
of our launch towards implementing
the middle school redesign program
further down the road
and with that said i would turn over the
presentation to
claire thank you
so the if you would go to the next slide
please
and then finally we just want to ask the
board
you've um you've received
the you know draft charge
from staff in terms of
what um we heard you know we
we had a work session with you and then
in
focusing on middle schools in the
southeast
were wanting you to let us know does
this scope in charge
deliver what is needed is it um
not really looking for wordsmithing
tonight we'll have a chance to do that
later
offline but are any desired outcomes
missing
or what gives you pause and what else do
we need to finalize the charge
all right so we're going to ask folks to
kind of focus in on that question that's
there on your slide
oh does this scope and sorry roseanne or
whoever you are too fast for me
um in charge deliver what is needed
does this scope and charge deliver what
is needed
um so we'll run through the list um
director bailey does this scope and
charge deliver what is needed for you
um i think
pretty much um so i want to want to be
03h 45m 00s
clear on what i really like in it
one is that uh in contrast
to the first or what we learned in
in the first phase is that
we want educators our educators to give
specific instruction
around optimal
dual language immersion program
configurations
and to give guidance around focus
options as well
particularly creative science that
that's
our that's the district's role and not
the committee's role to do both of those
things
as well as specifying
what we consider an optimal range for
uh enrollment in each school to avoid
under enrollment and on when they hand
in overcrowding on the other hand
so i'm i'm happy to see those
in the charge i think it's important in
when you read in the scope
to note that while we're focused on
harrison park
and on lane that but that other
middle schools in the area may come into
play as we look at
shifting some programs around
as well as boundaries to get harrison
park
up to an optimal uh in that optimal
range
and again long term considering where we
think enrollment is going
at the same time easing the overcrowding
at the other
three middle schools three or four
middle schools in the area
so um i just want to be very clear it's
not just
those two middle schools that are called
out that
may be impacted but others as well
thank you director bailey director
broome edwards does this um scope and
charge work for you
i had a couple questions i appreciate
staff in advance
um asking them i had some
governance questions um is this
are we doing the same model the last
time which is
this is a body that's recommending to
staff and then staff recommending to the
board or is there a change
so i'm sorry um could you repeat your
question yeah
um are we using the same model we did
last time which is
this is a this is a group that's going
to make recommendations
to staff and then staff would make
recommendations to the board
versus their board okay great
um the guiding coalition would
bring a proposal forward and then i
would review it with the superintendent
and then
i would bring it to the board um
for your approval
so i just had just some top of mind
thoughts just from the last
process um i think
keeping um well as close as board
members want to be
engaged but um just making sure there's
like lots of communication flow i know
especially since well at least for me
this is sort of in my
in my neighborhood um that just
interested in having a
high degree of information flow about
what's happening so we don't get to the
very end of the process and then there
be
like oh we didn't know what x was
happening um
i would encourage us to not just
give the um group just
one tool like here's a hammer versus
there may be a variety of things
that you could come back and recommend
and i
um and i specifically when i'm thinking
about creative
science school you know thinking about
the questions that i have of
if we're moving away from k-8s here's
another k-8
um what what you know why would we be
keeping that
as a separate as a separate entity as a
case as a remaining
k-8 k8 or you know are there other
models like the sunny side
environmental school model that i would
hope it's not just like the only way to
solve this
is a boundary change um
the other thing is um and this isn't in
the
charge but maybe it's in the sort of
guardrails the discussion with the
community if there
is the potential of an outcome that
um schools would be consolidated which
to most school communities they read
that as there is one school that's
closed that gets consolidated into
another
is that we think about how we have that
conversation because that's
a very traumatic event for a school
community and
um if if that's contemplated as part of
this
03h 50m 00s
i think we should build in like how how
that works
um so it's not just the weakest school
community or the smallest
and you know i think
generally uh i like
the approach i think
as a southeast resident
the most obvious question i see and i
know i asked the question is like why
isn't selwood listed
because all the other middle schools are
listed
and the answer was well this only the
elementary school this closest but to me
it still impacts the middle school and
it just seems strange not to have
if we're talking about lane to have an
adjacent middle school
not be named as like
we're all part of this process all the
southeast
schools so i think i have that as an
outstanding
question about not explicitly
naming so wood and then
my final thing and some broken record
about this is just
um the unique nature of southeast
portland and that
people can live across the street from a
school and it's
probably the only place in the city
where you can't just go to the
neighborhood
go to the school that happens to be
across the street from you and
i hope that we're building strong
communities
and they don't always have to be
neighborhood schools but
it would be nice to have some
and i i um hear your question about cell
with their um director from edwards and
i had
we had discussed that quite a bit in our
briefing on wednesday about um
you know selwood being sort of further
away and so yes while there may be a
middle school change and the feeder
pattern itself would it's um
it's a little different claire would you
like to address that or are you wanting
to respond to these questions at a later
date how would it be
so in in terms of why not sell wood
when we talk to some of our
instructional
leaders um and especially in our phase
one
when a school was in there were several
schools that were in the process and
they were gaining students and not
losing students and they didn't seem to
need
um um
[Music]
they we had a hard time um
having purchased you know regular
participation from the schools when
there wasn't
like a big change happening to the
school
and the current middle school students
would continue through
the school they're in so it's really the
feeder pattern elementary school
that is where
we want to make sure the parents are
aware of their middle school might
change
because they're the ones that would be
impacted and not necessarily this
the the families and the students that
are
in um uh the school
that they're current that are currently
in the middle school
so i so basically you know we certainly
could
um look at the list of schools that
certainly is
um not now it's not in the charge
um the list of schools but we've just
provided the list that we're
um working with at this point
but this will of course you know will
modify it based on
what charge comes from what outcome
comes from this conversation with the
board
intellectually i understand that
argument it's just the
one sort of southeast school that's
never had sort of the moving programs
around
and it has the sort of highest ses i
think
um so just other people will be like hey
how come someone's not party if this is
like
we're all in it together in southeast
how come so what's not in it i think
is a question that will need to be
answered because it's like they they
haven't had any of the programs coming
in and out of the school
um so i just put that in the table i
understand that
intellectually you're the rationale of
why it's not
in there i think we'll get a lot of
questions about
well we can we can add silva that's not
uh we were trying to keep it smaller
because um the larger gets the the um we
were trying to
you know take some of the board's advice
from the last work session of
simplifying the process but we certainly
cannot sell one in i'm opposed to adding
cellwood because i think
the what i think what director bryn
edwards is asking is for an explanation
why someone is not included
rather than adding solid to the scope of
the work so i think if we just need to
be clear on
this has to do with geography and
spacing and placement
and not um try to solve a problem
by increasing the scope i think we just
she's asking for clarity around we need
to be able to
clearly communicate to the public why
this is
03h 55m 00s
it has different adjacent boundary with
lane and lanes under enrolled so the
obvious thing people would say is like
why don't we just move some of the
silhouette kiss into lane
i mean it that is a question people will
ask
and so i that's and that is one of the
options we're looking at in the
schools that are that are currently in
sellwood that are closest to lane
are included as in the process it's just
not named as like the
this
elementary schools that are changing
it's it would be elementary boundaries
that would change feeder patterns to
other elementary schools would impact
solid middle school
so i think maybe to name sellwood as
part of it because it will
have changes but it's different than
looking at like a harrison park that's
under enrolled and the kinds of changes
that will be happening
um so maybe for clarity to have cell
would add it in would be
beneficial
okay you can do that let's
um i am director depos do you have a
question or comment about how the scope
and charge is working for you
uh yeah thank you i'm i'm happy with the
scope uh generally
um i also like the conversation we just
had about sellwood
i think that i come from a big family
and it's always this idea of uh when
we're talking about equity
um that's that might be balancing
impacts so i think it's a good
question to put on the table i also feel
like any school that
may be impacted whether that's a net
loss or net gain would be really
important to
engage those families and my question
always is around um
well i have two questions one's about
the guiding coalition is it going to be
the same makeup that it was before
are we doing anything to um being very
attentional i i know as we were last
time in terms of hearing from
the families of color in southeast
and then um just kind of a general
question how are we going to know uh
when we're successful
um i think the language we were talking
about was like supporting
supporting bipac i i know we talk about
it a lot i never have a really clear
understanding of what that means in
terms of
outcomes um so it would i would just
love to get some clarity it can be
offline or here in the moment
about um what it what does it mean what
what are we talking about when we're
talking about equity
um a clarification of the outcomes that
we would expect
so one of the things about a lower
enrollment
is you have fewer human you have fewer
resources in the building and so
right now we have two that are
identified and by the
demographics of those schools we can see
um that are but they're highly
representative
of you know our bipark students or in
these schools
that are under enrolled and so then
there aren't as many opportunities when
you have fewer staff members to support
the students so by increasing enrollment
in the schools then you also you know
the staffing allocations
follow and by balancing that out
regionally
then you have more equitable programs
for our bipark students in these schools
what is the so i understand harrison
parks demographics but what what is the
other school is it bridger
it's lane it's lane okay and it's under
enrolled
um as is harrison park yes
okay and i don't know on in terms of the
engagement if shanice if you'd like to
add
more about how we engage the
the families especially our bipod or our
families of color absolutely
um i think that's a continued
thing that is of value in the process
especially
um explicitly looking at the
characteristics
of how uh whiteness
can be centered and so a big key
part of how we want to measure
the value or the quality of uh what this
work will look like
is uh is doing a set of things but
really uh creating space that counter
uh these uh dominant inequities or
narratives with counter narratives
uh that really honor the experiences
of of students and the intelligence of
our family
uh throughout uh the very conversations
that uh
take place in our uh in their
uh decision making around a uh consensus
uh and i think that the multiple
engagement methods
uh are gonna be vital uh especially as
04h 00m 00s
uh we think about the various uh
political social uh contexts that
our families especially our bipoc
families are navigating
uh that having these dedicated spaces
spaces that have advisory
and insight through school
focused meetings or partner-focused
meetings
in specific spaces that that help with
these narratives in addition to um
leaning on our southeast guiding
coalition members to
uh continue doing uh that hard work of
uh thinking about uh how racial equity
and social justice values
in our process uh really can help
uh uh i think counteract that either or
thinking
um in that uh right
to comfort or thinking there's only one
right way
to uh the multiple um i think scenarios
that will approach so i think it's
really
complex um and and that uh
uh thinking thinking about our racial
equity design process
is really going to be formative and um
creating that structure to grapple with
uh
what what will be what will be difficult
and um
i think we want to reframe our the
uh the fear of open uh conflicts
and and really lean into uh how we
have group discussions that center on
the priorities that are important to
people in our community but explicitly
uh
uh holds the the structure
to lift up voices uh from from our uh
black
native and families and students of
color and so i think there could be more
especially insight and perspective that
uh
the uh uh members of the board uh
can and provide us in this process and
would be happy to continue dialogue and
um
uh think that your participation in in
ways
uh that uh uh yeah
that that help be informed of how how
the
kind of coalition is grappling with with
different
areas of the work um i think would be
really i think beneficial
and um um in in more in more ways than
one so
yes i think hopefully that that
addresses it and we can also address
more offline yeah thank you i
i saw that um text was going to be used
and i really love
that i love that thank you um
what the the app whatsapp um i used that
when i worked for the housing bureau
on a couple projects that were east of
82nd and it was really effective
in terms of reaching people that have
family on other continents
it's it's like a free app and you can
text between continents for no charge
and
it's a great way to get information out
to the community um
even here in portland um specifically
the immigrant and refugee communities
that's cool michelle uh director
constant how's the
scope and charge for you um
good i'm grateful that people still want
to continue
with this uh with our guiding coalition
um
and i really appreciated um dr o
hi nice to see you miss you
miss going to schools um dr o really
appreciated your talking about
just uh how we are integrating
instructional
leadership and our building leadership
in this process
i i think more deeply than we did the
last time
and i think that made things a little
bumpier for us
in the first round because we didn't
have that kind of input
particularly around dli we punted a
little bit to our community to make some
decisions where they should have had
some more information
about just the the the pedagogical
and the academic approach around our dli
programs
um director bailey you mentioned the
focus option programs there
i actually don't see that spelled out in
the charge
as clearly and obviously creative
science is right in the middle of the
mix
and we're going to have to make
decisions there not just about
location and configuration and grade
bands
but also about you know
their status as a focus option program
and do they
do they move to another location intact
or do we make a change i don't see that
clearly spelled out that there's going
to be
a focus from our instructional team on
really addressing what's best for that
school community
from an academic standpoint and a
community standpoint first before we
tackle the nuts and bolts issues of how
do we fit them in
in the reconfiguration of our southeast
schools so
i just wanted to highlight that that
wasn't clearly spelled out
04h 05m 00s
you know another on the instructional
side um
i th that another issue that we didn't
raise
very explicitly was just about the
continuity of some of our programs and
focus programs to high school and i know
we're doing our level best to keep our
high schools
out of this process but i hope that we
um i know we're still going to have to
pay some attention to
the continuity and matriculation of
different programs
there and also just
i know it's deferred but we've got some
work to do on our high school
enrollment balancing so to the extent
that we
impact that with decisions here
we need to be mindful about that um if
we're not going to get to
actually doing that work until a couple
years down the road
let's try not to make it any worse in
the meantime
um because we already know we've got
some issues there
um
lastly one other thing that i didn't see
mentioned
well i saw mentioned a little bit but um
i really would like to see um a more
robust student engagement and speaking
of engagement shanice
that um that slide you had
was so cool and i want to talk to you
later about like where did that come
from
did you create it you know with the
empathy interviewing
everything i mean there was so much to
that as an
actual approach um and i was thinking to
myself i have to say this i thought
this right here does not look to me like
an artifact of a racist organization
and i may be saying that in the negative
but i'm feeling a little sensitive
tonight because our
explicitly and radically and
well i'll just leave it at explicitly
and radically anti-racist superintendent
was kind of personally attacked tonight
and
i think as a board we didn't
we didn't respond to that and i'm not
i'm not
saying anything about the personal
experience of the testimony that we
heard
the anecdotal evidence um but it was a
personal attack
on our anti-racist leadership of this
district
and i know that that must be hard for
our other
staff members of color who are on this
call tonight and i'm getting off track
um
but that to me was an important moment
and i'm gonna offer you superintendent
my personal apology that you did not
in the moment um hear from your board
in appreciation for
your values and how they infuse the
direction
and the work that we're doing and we
still have a long way to go
we still have a long way to go in terms
of equitable hiring
but i personally i personally miss the
opportunity
to reinforce to you that
we appreciate that leadership and then
i'm not making very much sense because
it's 10 23 and we haven't even
gotten to our budget yet but then to tie
that back shanice
to that slide that you had which was
really quite remarkable and i know
it's not just remarkable in the way it
lays things out but that it is actually
how you approach
this work and how we approach talking to
our families about making these kind of
decisions
and that's pretty radical in terms of
how we do business we've really come
a long way and we still stumble and we
still have
a long way to go but that's our work
that's the work that we're doing and
that we're trying to do
and i want you to know that i see that
and i think a lot of us see that and
want to be on board
with this anti-racist
learning organization um
and it's all hard work it's all hard
work
um but
uh superintendent thank you
for the staff thank you for the
leadership that you show
thank you for guiding the way
and um
i'm going to jump into i appreciate you
um direct constant
um bringing that up and i also want to
um just
appreciate you a superintendent in the
moment um
this has been an incredible an
incredible a year
just unprecedented you've heard that
04h 10m 00s
word so many times
at the same time um shanice i heard you
talk
bring out some of these elements of um
that that
document that we've all as a board gone
through in our single
racial equity training that we've been
to together and we give a lot of
airspace
to self-improvement and self-assessment
and evaluation and how we govern
but what we don't do is we don't talk
about race as a board and we don't talk
about um
we don't have the hard conversations um
about
race or social and cultural identities
um what norms that we follow and which
ones we don't we have a norm
you know it was broken tonight and
that's like listen to learn
not to rebut listen to learn and we have
adults in the room that you know
we need to hold ourselves accountable
for for doing that
that that's in portrait of a graduate we
want our graduates to be able to do that
um so we don't really have a way to
assess ourselves in how we're doing and
i would say that um
it might be incorrect for a white person
to say oh we're not anti-racist
you know when we look at outcomes that
are that are predictable by race
still and it's not just i'm not just
calling out this institution it's
in every institution in in the us
and so we're not exceptional that way
we're we're very much
in line with other public entities and
other private entities
we have to know that and name it before
we address it
if we say that we're we're not
anti-racist then we might as well
go home and let black and native kids
fail
you know i don't think any of us want
that here so
um i i feel like we do need to um
i we we can also both appreciate the
hard work of the superintendent of the
staff
and be critical of um and supportive of
working together to
in service of um creating a creating a
district that's anti-racist
way in the future hopefully sooner
rather than later so
i want to hold that space that it's okay
to see both it's okay to have
a both and situation it's not we don't
have to have either or thinking here
um i also just want to apologize
superintendent i didn't say anything in
the moment
um and i wish i would have also because
i know that silence equals violence
and i've been in the position you have
where um
things are being flown or thrown around
and no one says anything
um so so i apologize i think that nobody
uh there's no place for throwing insults
and i'm just gonna again ask us to do
better as a board
when we do our self-assessment we
absolutely need to talk about race and
we actually
probably need to do regular racial
trainings
on race i mean on race on how we
interact
how we recognize it how we address it
because we don't do that right now
it's just it's too uncomfortable um i
agree michelle
i agree i um
i think that michelle you nailed it
totally this
intention of being a board member is
this supporting and
championing when we see success and when
we see
moving the needle and then also holding
the district accountable and so that's
our
our corporate work is both um saying
yay and also okay wait a minute um and
and it can be a difficult a difficult
dance to do especially in the moment
when
when so much is happening um in a
meeting but i do i do want to echo what
director compton said and great
appreciation for your work shanice
on this um and congratulations
on uh all that you're doing and i also
am thankful that you're in the cat club
i saw your your cat was there behind you
a little bit uh
i do think that this conversation about
selwood is really important
um because i do think one of the things
we we struggled with in the last
round of this uh southeast guiding
coalition was that schools were
surprised that they were
impacted so i think if we we need to be
really clear about if we're moving
elementaries
what middle schools are affected and
that um we just need to be
i think very transparent with the school
communities about the kinds of things
we're talking about
for them and why um and and to make sure
if we're leaving someone off a list that
that we're clear with that community
what that means or if they're on a list
what that potentially means because i
think you know as we saw with preston
there was some
surprise with that community about being
delayed um
and then you know the the kind of rocky
road there to get them to the finish
line so
the more we can be transparent with our
communities up front the better but i do
like the scope and i do like the charge
and i think this focus on these middle
schools especially on
right-sizing the middle schools is
exactly what the southeast guiding
coalition needs to be
taking on director moore um how is this
uh scope and charge for you
um i i i think
04h 15m 00s
it's good um i think um
i want to especially um
echo director bailey's comments at the
very beginning
um that i think others have also
mentioned um
i think it will be important and
um and very helpful for the southeast
guiding coalition to get
um concrete guidance from staff
about um kind of the parameters
and
[Music]
you know things like location of dli um
target enrollments per building
um that the southeast coalition should
be kind of
using as targets um
so a lot of the uh i i think
this charge has been improved by adding
the the component of
of uh real um significant guidance from
the from staff about certain elements
that uh are going to kind of frame the
puzzle that is
the southeast guidance guiding
coalitions work
um i i guess the one thing i would say
is um i want to speak to my board
colleagues
um i think
the board needs to be very clear
um with both staff and the southeast
guiding coalition
about what we understand to be the
charge we are giving them
um i i've said this endlessly before
but i'm going to so i will try to keep
this
short but i i want to reiterate that um
the kind of work that is going to be
happening
in this phase 2 process is going to be
immensely complicated
um far more complicated than the work
that was done in phase one
um and it is highly likely
probably inevitable that
um some of the
some of the decisions that are going to
have to be made um the recommendations
that are going to be made
will involve changes that will not be
universally
um applauded um by everyone in the
southeast
um change is going to be necessary here
it it is in the nature of this beast
therefore
um board members
and and you'll be dealing with this
after i am
i am off the board so um my
friendly advice i guess is to um
before before we as a board
vote on this charge i i would ask that
you
each think about what you understand
this charge to mean
and when the time comes to
consider the recommendation that is
going to be coming
from staff or from the southeast guiding
coalition sort of via staff
[Music]
remember that the work that was done in
order to produce that recommendation
involved an enormous amount
of very detailed
very complex
very um
kind of uh what's the words the
there's a term for this but it's sort of
it's a gordian knot
like everything is connected to
everything
and whatever recommendation comes out of
the southeast
guiding coalition is going to be a very
delicate balance
and the board needs to understand that
any any kind of change that
is made at the board level
in the absence of some really intense
work
by board members to understand the
implications of any changes
is not going to be in service to our
children
this is going to be really hard work
frankly i'm sorry i'm missing it because
this is exactly the kind of hard work i
i love to tackle maybe you can apply to
be on the southeast guiding coalition
i don't live down there so it would be
out of place but but i will be paying
attention just
in case you were wondering um but i i'm
just actually
out here nada down there
i think that it would benefit to have a
histo a southeast guiding coalition
historian
04h 20m 00s
there we go well uh i think i know we
all want to keep rita around because we
love her so much but i am going to ask
us to move on to director
scott unless you have something else to
add director moore
um no just be be thoughtful careful
and respectful of the work that's all
director thought uh how is this charge
and scope for you
fine yeah no i don't think i have any
objections i have one quick question
um and it's pretty basic one so the
statement that sort of most of the other
k through five enrollment issues are not
going to be addressed i i think is a
capacity
issue is is that right are those things
getting addressed
is that like a phase three um
what's the plan there it would need to
come later i think some of it will
happen um just with um
with some of the things that we need to
do at the middle school level
it trickles into the elementary but not
all under-enrolled elementary will be
resolved we
were working um this you know
with the conversation um
from our last work session and hearing
from many of the board about to some
simplify the process and that that was
we looked at four different phases and
we're recommending
not phases four different levels of work
and we're recommending um level one was
do nothing
level two was harrison park level three
was going to lane
um and level four would have been adding
the elementary so we stopped at harrison
park and lane
because we recognize if you um balance
harrison park and then you only have
lane
it's the only middle school that's out
of balance and everything else is in
balance
and when are we how are we going to get
it in balance
so it needed to happen now
okay thank you that is what i assumed
but thanks yeah
thank you student representative
um i have no particular problems with
these
scope and charged um i
have got a number of questions about
uh student engagement in particular in
phase two
um i wonder if now is the ideal time
to ask them
would you like to have nathaniel direct
those questions directly to you via
email maybe so you can do some
kind of responding to him or would you
rather have us entertain those now
i i think i i know i'm speaking for
chinese but i think the lateness of the
hour
um um
student representatives shu we certainly
have um
had a couple of conversations about this
as well as
the um student representatives in the
coalition
and really listening to your discussion
with us
it's clear the engagement for students
needs to be different than
um being necessarily
we were not successful in um it was hard
work for students
to be in that long process in engaging
the whole period through
um but we're really focusing on other
ways to
um that is more um meaningful for our
students in terms of giving
us our their input in engaging them in
in the process so i know that shanice
has
listed it in the presentation and gone
through it a little bit but i think that
we can follow up
um with you outside of this out after
tonight's
process okay if you want to
express that would be great
okay if i may
hear from shanice and then we'll we'll
move on from this topic
i'll just share really briefly um i know
uh as a result
of some rethinking um of
how to really have more student
input that is present throughout the
beginning
and end of the process i think that's
really
informed uh some new
methods that are we really want to think
about that
uh acknowledge the context in which
students are sitting in
and so in addition to these uh focus
groups in
typical spaces uh we
definitely want to use virtual means to
engage with students and have these
student
focused forums that hope happen
and multiple times during during the
phase two process
um in addition to having a student
membership on coalition and
i think we're grappling with what does
it look like for
students to have multiple means to weigh
into the process
um if uh in in addition
right to be the membership on the
04h 25m 00s
coalition that's
uh this very extended time commitment um
that
we've we are not finding is accessible
um
and so um uh would be looking forward to
uh kind of hearing your questions and
seeing what uh
solutions or uh things that we can add
uh to
some of these strategies as well um for
for the phase two process
thank you shanice all right you two
connect then
i see you've been trying to add
something in is it an essential comment
on this discussion
um i believe so it uh
it's responding to um director constance
i think indicated that there was around
focus option
programs where their whether staff would
provide guidance or not
and i believe the charge says pretty
specifically
that pps staff will provide guidance on
preferred locations and configurations
of
dli programs special education services
focus option
programs so i just wanted that to be
clarified and make sure i'm correct on
that
deputy hearts do you have a response to
that
i think that was straight from the
charge so that's accurate what scott
just read
the question is whether guidance on
focus options
actually entails sort of a
a thorough academic review
of those programs where they fit in our
constellation
and you know what the justification is
given that we well i i think it's
largely yeah
steph has very consistently said that
that kind of evaluation
is longer term and outside of
this process um that it's
much more involved than what will happen
is that correct
superintendent clerido
that's what i've heard you say any
number of times
that is a big question that you're
asking director bailey around
an evaluation of programming and school
impact but uh deputy hurt
you look like you were about to respond
so i don't want to
jump in if we want to include that in
the scope of this charge
that's a bigger endeavor it it i don't
think
um the when we look at the time frame
that we're trying to do
for the fall of
22 i don't believe
doing a program evaluation of a program
during a pandemic
is necessary you know when we're in
hybrid learning is necessarily
the appropriate time to to do that
evaluation
anyway i so i don't mean to interrupt
you superintendent guru
i just um recognize
that while there's a good question
that was raised tonight about
k-5 versus 6-8
[Music]
there is in terms of
evaluating the program that is there is
a whole process
um in a board policy that we'd need to
follow that certainly
isn't within the timeline of what we're
trying to accomplish in
the southeast region does that clarify
the question for you
uh director bailey and dr constance
yeah what which me it means we're not
going to get a full scale evaluation of
the program
um however i think it's pretty clear
there may be some major
changes coming in and what that program
looks like in the future
just because that's that's where we are
sorry i didn't you know but i'm just
going back full circle because i raised
it at the very beginning i
um i think there should be some
flexibility
and that's different from a full program
evaluation
but i frankly don't see how having gone
through
the access pioneer
the whole like search for a building for
a
a whole school that there's a place to
pick up that school
and put it somewhere else and i think we
should
um ask for
not a full program evaluation but you
know what are what are some of the
options
i i guess that's the guidance that
i'm expecting staff to provide
[Music]
and that you know guidance can be
uh fairly general guidance can be
04h 30m 00s
pretty specific um but
the coalition members from the phase one
are pretty clear
that's not our decision you you all need
to tell us
what your decision is on how
uh how this rolls forward
all right uh i i want to say one
one more quick thing which is that
uh in the phase one decision um
i think we called it the constant
amendment
uh which which applied our current
policy
uh to how some students were moved
around
i i think that raised a number of equity
issues
and i think this board should
be very aware of
those issues going forward and decide
well ahead of time
again i won't be around for this
but should decide ahead of time
whether it wants to suspend some of its
current policies
um through the remainder
of enrollment balancing for the
southeast north and northeast going
forward
are you talking specifically about kids
who are out of district for a school
having the right to matriculate
to the next yeah that was the amendment
that we
that you had raised and i supported and
just called it by your name because that
was
easy in the midst of the jumble that
night and i'm not i'm not
pointing a finger no know but i just
want to be sure that it's clear
what you're talking about because yeah
and it wasn't out of
uh out of district it was out of
catchment area well right
neighborhood yeah students not return it
was the we wanted students to return to
their neighborhood school
as the board policy states um but i
think director bailey is causing calling
us to look at that with an equity lens
and
he had not been enforcing our policy
right
sorry yeah yeah so instead of
coming up at the last minute i think we
need to anticipate that going
i hope that you anticipate that going
forward
and have more of a discussion of it so
we are about two hours we're a little
we're more than two hours behind
schedule and we have some
guests that from the citizens budget
review committee that need to give us
their report
we are going to have a hard stop to this
meeting at midnight so that means we
have an
hour and 15 13 minutes left to do the
work of hearing cbrrc
and have a conversation about the budget
so i just want us all to be mindful
of of um our questions and the length of
time for which we speak to make sure
everybody can get through
but we will have a hard stop at midnight
just to honor all of us
i think many of us have uh that are on
the board have jobs
rita's retired but everybody else um has
things to do in the morning and then we
need to be
kind and humane to our staff as well so
we will have a hard stop at midnight
so my question to you now is do you want
to take a break now or
do you want us to continue on
nathaniel has something you'd like to
say i'd like to tell you
yeah i'd just like to say first um that
i
feel that we need to have a full board
discussion at some point about the
student engagement aspect
of phase two i know we were going to um
at that meeting that we initially
decided on the role and
scope of the of phase two but it got
cut with time um i i think it's a
crucial conversation how can we need to
schedule it
at some point soon
okay well we will we will be voting on
this charge
um this will come back to us so we have
more work to do here so that
um we'll you know you can report it out
to us nathaniel after you
talk to shanice what um that that looks
like as we have that
um vote uh andrew so i know we have
guests and
obviously we're going to respect that
and hear them i do just want to register
like i i i'm really troubled by the idea
that our budget conversation is
happening at 11 o'clock at night
i think that not only dishonors our
staff but it dishonors the public
as well and i i don't know what the
solution is at that point in terms of
keeping us on schedule but
it it is very disturbing to me that that
this is where we are
so we can make the decision and i i want
to say that
i agree um it's the same reason i was
upset about the way we did our board
elections
at the end of the meeting at 12 30 at
night um
even the most dedicated person would
have a hard time staying up they had to
report to work at eight o'clock tomorrow
we have a we as a board have to make
some choices
so you know we have um agenda
and we have items and i try to move us
through them um in a timely fashion but
also respecting the amount of time that
board members need to
make speeches and ask questions so um
you know we try to finesse that our
options right now are we can
adjourn the meeting now and ask cbrc to
come back
04h 35m 00s
and do our budget conversation board
members would have to be willing to
schedule an additional meeting and we'd
have to
be willing to ask staff to come back
whether that's tomorrow night or
another time this week we could do that
or we can proceed
until midnight um but it's it's up to
sort of the will of the board at this
point
um when we would like to engage in this
business
um i think some of this is our own
self-discipline about how we show up
with questions and how we engage our
time
um because if we if we just constantly
i'm just encouraging us all to be good
self-managers of our time when we're at
board meetings um
because we have a lot that's before us a
lot of work to do and maybe one of the
possibilities is that we need to go back
to having a board meeting every week
if we constantly um need more time with
things so that's that's kind of the the
question
to board members to consider um so what
do you guys want to do now do you want
to adjourn now
and come back to this later do we want
to hear from cbrc now because they've
been waiting for two and a half hours
what's the will of the board
haley is the cbrc um just making a
presentation to us are they expecting
some kind of a conversation they're
making their presentation to us
i you know i'm going to keep pointing us
back to that document
about white supremacy and organizations
and
um it's kind of like a value we need to
decide what our values are we
value just rushing stuff through or do
we value
um having a deeper understanding and
taking a little bit longer to process
it's like we have to kind of define who
we are um
in this moment then we need to go back
to having two meetings
there a meeting every week so that we
have that time to process
um because we have so much work we have
a lot of work to get through so the
question is how do we best get through
that is it to have
long meetings every other week or is it
to have multiple meetings a week
or a mo a week meeting every week or is
it to have
multiple meetings i mean we as a board
do get to decide how we want to
structure our time
um but right now we're in a decision
point so i think what
i'm going to ask is that we have cvrc do
their presentation
and then after that i'll ask the board
if you want to continue with the budget
discussion or if we want to table that
for another meeting
um so let's go ahead and have judah and
sarah present to us and then we'll go
from there
if they're still here i think that's a
good way to proceed
yeah i agree that gives us some time to
process what we want to do after we hear
from them
all right sarah
sorry to judah and sarah for keeping you
both up so late tonight i know that you
were scheduled to present at 8
30 um but uh thanks for hanging out with
the glamorous board life
we've done this before we had our
expectations set
i was gonna say a little levity the good
news is my
young children who often interrupt these
types of meetings have been asleep for a
few hours so we
won't have that joy i'm going to do the
formal introduction of you all
we're hearing right now from our board's
community budget review committee more
commonly known as the cvrc with their
annual report on the superintendent's
proposed budget and presenting tonight
we have the fabulous cbrc co-chairs
sarah kerr and judy mccoy welcome
we'll turn it over to you guys
thank you should we just get right into
the letter sarah
okay uh i presume everyone has the
letter in the board materials yes
excellent then i'm going to just start
into it
for the purposes of folks watching
live and on the recording i'll start
with a brief
background and purpose of the cbrc the
community budget review committee the
cbrc
reviews evaluates and makes
recommendations to the portland public
school board of education
regarding the superintendent's proposed
budget and any other budgetary issues
the cbrc
or the board identify the cbs cbrc also
monitors and advises the board
on the allocation and expenditure of
local option levy funds
which we completed as a separate
document which should also be in the
board materials
so to kick off for uh this year's review
um
little context the fiscal year 21 22
budget review process
has been as we all recognize uh
challenging for both pps finance staff
and the cbrc
physical distancing requirements related
to covet 19
continue to disrupt the usual budget
review process
and meeting schedule while continual
funding stream changes made for a moving
target for staff analysis and planning
there's significant limitations around
our ability to provide a comprehensive
report and recommendations to the board
the continued uncertainty around how
schools will reopen this fall despite
the superintendent guerrero's commitment
to a full five-day per
week in-person return make it very
difficult to evaluate whether the
04h 40m 00s
proposed budget will ultimately
be responsive to the new reality we face
regardless we feel
all parties have worked more diligently
and closely together than any year prior
and we're optimistic about future
collaboration as we welcome chief
financial officer roberto de gadillo to
the district
great so i'm going to move us next into
the focus of our review which are
the four board goals we did have a good
amount of discussion as a committee
about how to orient the report
and ultimately decided that the four
goals still served as a good anchor
for a review and so that's how we
proceeded
in terms of the primary focus
of the four goals articulated by the
board as a result of a comprehensive
visioning process completed in 2019
which all folks
here were uh have been a close part of
uh those goals being third grade reading
fifth grade mathematics
eighth grade snapshot of graduate
performance and post-secondary readiness
uh ready for college and career of the
four goals
we believe uh after much analysis that
the fifth grade math goal is
most at risk at this point in time for
not being that although we have you know
questions and concerns about all four
goals and the map
testing done this winter shows that math
growth is lagging especially for our
fifth
seventh and eighth graders
the bulk of this report will be composed
of two parts first
observations on the budget and then a
set of recommendations voted on
and agreed to by the committee first off
some observations
we believe the budget demonstrates
substantial support for the four budget
board goals this budget however rests
upon several assumptions including a
return to full-time in-person attendance
and the student population projection at
the same levels of 2019-2020
if these assumptions hold then the flat
staffing model from the 2019-2020
should provide adequate levels of
service that we previously saw
increases towards the specified board
goals but if those assumptions are
incorrect or the limited map testing in
the past year
did not catch the full extent of
declines in academic progress
then we may see further regression we
further note that we continue to lack
direct measures of the goals set for
eighth grade snapshot of graduate
performance
and post-secondary readiness secondly we
believe the superintendent and board are
deeply committed to racial equity and
social justice
and the racial equity and social justice
lens has improved
the district's focus on historically
underserved students
this year's edition of a critical
analysis from staff of budget changes
with a specific lens of the res j
process makes substantial progress in
helping the community
understand the intended impact of budget
changes
we have also seen a concerted effort to
reflect the diversity of our community
in the makeup of central office staff
and we believe that these efforts are
critical to implementing the res j lens
district wide
three we also believe that the board and
superintendent have overall crafted a
budget
that squarely vocals focused on
investing in historically underserved
students
and specifically black and native
students in addition to the continued
allocation of equity funds
and student success act funds the
proposal to target federal relief funds
to summer acceleration programs focused
on the highest needs population is
welcome
continuing with our observations uh the
fourth
is the equity allocation of eight
percent of the staffing model
at targeted schools has held steady
since fy 1617
we as a committee continue to support
this investment and approach
and note that the visibility and note
the visibility and appreciate the
visibility in the budget book volume 2
which is a valuable tool to demonstrate
transparency to the community
however only providing school-level
staff allocation lacks the transparency
into intended uses
and accountable outcomes that we wish to
see and we're happy to talk more about
this we
explored this quite a bit as a committee
but i'll leave it at that for now
um moving to number five we acknowledge
that the district faces significant
challenges
created by the pandemic and its
lingering effects on enrollment
facilities
academic and social emotional needs of
students and urge the district
um to take a do now build toward
approach
which we believe can help the district
emerge stronger and healthier
than it was prior to the pandemic in the
do now category
we want to underscore the need for
one-time federal funds to be immediately
used
for equity focused activities such as
high-dosage tutoring small group
instruction
extended core instructional time and
specific grades and subjects and
mentoring and other social emotional
supports
in the build tour category we urge the
district to invest in more learning time
the extended days or years inter
sessions and ongoing high intensity
tutoring
smaller class sizes in priority grades
and subjects
04h 45m 00s
where needs are greatest which might be
offset by larger class sizes elsewhere
integrated learning systems across live
and asynchronous platforms and
specialized and advanced
high school classes offered online to
maximize access and free teachers
for more individualized instruction in
some
and that was a lot we urge the board and
district to use all resources
at its disposal not just to fill holes
but to plant seeds
for long-term change number six
uh we continue to believe cuts now
reaching three million at least based on
our understanding
to central services may be unwise and
unsustainable as they may result in
essential services and support
two schools being carried out poorly or
in some cases not at all
while we understand and appreciate the
emphasis on ensuring ample funding is
set aside for
schools directly we believe that that
the district is under serving
or under investing rather in centralized
positions designed to ensure
schools and students are supported um
and i
a side note here want to acknowledge we
had a good discussion about
um to understand that some positions are
being repurposed to address immediate
needs like summer acceleration
which we as a committee really support
but do wonder about the staff
who are being repurposed for new
positions you know what
their prior responsibilities what that
results in what's not happening or
what's being deprioritized or delayed
as as a result lastly we appreciate the
pps
uh maintained the winter administration
of the map assessment and strongly
encouraged the district to resume
administer full administration in the
fall
we're cautiously optimistic about some
of the results particularly in reading
however we want to fully acknowledge the
limitations of the administration
namely lower participation rates
especially among bipac students
resulting in over-representation of
white students
we want to further emphasize that map
testing
measures reading and mathematics and
acknowledge the importance of a suite
of assessment measures or instruments
that help paint a more complete picture
of students social emotional and
academic well-being to move forward
turn it back to you for recommendations
judah
yes thank you so in our recommendation
selection
um we have a handful come up with
from the committee and they are as
follows
number one we recommend additional
investment in k through third literacy
while all students have been affected by
limitations distance learning younger
students in particular
have a more difficult time
self-directing reductions in learning
progress were not as severe as feared
however we are
still far from meeting the board adopted
goal of having sixty percent of third
graders reading proficiently by the end
of the 2021-2022 school year
targeted investments in one-time federal
money may increase progress towards the
school
this investment must also be paired with
a plan to reduce the achievement
disparities
within historically underserved groups
second we recommend that pps continue to
advocate for protecting and increasing
the k-12 budget for against school
districts
class sizes even net of student success
tactic
investments remain unacceptably high and
in particular additional state funding
could be used
to make strategic reductions to class
size and certain grades and subjects
that demonstrate the greatest need the
oregon department of education
quality education model recommended
funding level
has still not been achieved while the
student success act
was a big step in the right direction
the overall investment in oregon
students is still not adequate
the state legislature's proposal to
reduce state funding for education
on account of the federal money received
by schools and unacceptable
disinvestment in our schools
and three we recognize that the current
budget makes assumptions about the state
of school attendance in the fall and
beyond
including full-time in-person attendance
of all students with the opt-outs
moving to an online virtual academy
disassociated from their neighborhood
school
given the volatility of the situation
we've witnessed over the past year
we recommend that the district take a
proactive approach
and develop contingency plans with
public participation
the center vulnerable populations such
as special education students
to to address eventualities this work
should happen now rather than toward the
middle or an
end of the summer which will impact
family and students ability to plan for
the return to school
fourth we recommend increased investment
in recruiting supporting and retaining
teachers of color even as the district
faces budget constraints
this echoes a recommendation made last
year
we cannot afford to lose ground on the
early progress we've made to be clear
our black and native students will stand
to lose the most if we back off
our commitments making a deliberate
investment in supporting teachers of
color who are essential to supporting
students and ensuring equity
will go a long way toward improving
school climate and creating better
schools for the future for all students
we recognize that there have been some
budget allocat there has been some
budget allocation
movement towards this but we still lack
measures of the work being done in this
area despite
04h 50m 00s
multiple requests of the budget staff to
help us understand
um progress uh to date
and whether it is likely therefore we we
don't fully understand whether it's
likely to achieve the outcomes we desire
and whether the investment we're making
is adequate
we also have concerns about staff
burnout and demoralization that may
affect the district's ability to address
bringing students back
up to level and supporting students as
we move out of the pandemic
fifth we note that the state formula for
alternative and community-based
organizations
um in cbo school servicing some of the
district's most historically underserved
students provides
funding at 80 percent of the funding
levels provided to students at other
schools
we recommended we recommend rather that
the board urge the legislature to raise
the formula to 100 percent
while also increasing the funding by at
least 10 percent over state funding in
this budget regardless
sixth the budget process continues to be
opaque to people who are not well-versed
in governmental budgeting we recommend
continued work on developing summaries
and focused explanations of budgetary
decisions the intended effects
and the accountable outcomes for general
audiences and i think we've made this
recommendation several years and there
has been progress
we still see room for opportunity
and growth in this area uh seven we
recommend targeted federal funds toward
partnerships with cbo's community-based
organizations to provide a more
culturally responsive approach to
engaging students closing achievement
gaps
you should say also opportunity gaps and
making up for learning loss
partnerships with cbo's can also provide
culturally responsive approaches to
preparing high schoolers
to be successful post high school and
transition out of
high school into whatever path they
choose these investments would represent
movement
on several of the board's articulated
goals
number eight we recommend that school
improvement plans be made publicly
available for each school
equity allocations are provided to
almost all schools with plans being made
to utilize those allocations to achieve
desired improvements
however those plans and the
accountability for tracking outcomes are
not
consistently shared externally which
undermines our stated commitments
to being transparent and making data
driven decisions
we must commit to measuring our progress
in quantitative
for example map testing and qualitative
for example school climate surveys
uh both ways and enter into honest
direct conversations with school
communities about how we will continue
to improve
for several years now including in the
current proposed budget pps invests
um a hundred and forty thousand dollars
in a contract with panorama
to administer school climate surveys the
results of which at least for the past
four years
the current co-chairs have served on
cbrc
have not been made available until well
after the budget is adopted
we must we must collect a richer array
of information and ensure
it is available and used to inform
planning and budgeting in a just-in-time
way not after the budget is
adopted finally
custodial grounds and maintenance staff
has historically been acknowledged as an
area that was inadequately funded the
current budget has made targeted
investments to improve that however we
lack data and standards to understand
whether the investments are adequate to
support our district in the near term
and to protect the substantial work
being done to rebuild our aging schools
therefore we recommend that the district
identify industry standards for staffing
and investment needs
and establish a plan to achieve a
sustainable level
of required work
thank you and then closing the cbrc is
deeply appreciative of
superintendent guerrero's leadership and
in particular his commitment to ensuring
the needs of our district's most
historically underserved students
are prioritized during this challenging
time the fact is we have substantial
work to do to meet our goals including
work done through decades of inequitable
investments
and systems that have served to protect
white privilege at the expense of black
and native students and families
we call on the board to adopt a budget
that reflects these commitments and keep
us on an urgent focused path
toward a more equitable and excellent
system of schools even in the face of
uncertainty or delays to our planned
timeline our students cannot afford
anything less
thank you and we're available for
questions
as needed all right thank you so much
sarah and judah
um i was i've been trying to get my step
count so i've been standing here
listening walking in place as you were
talking about so my camera was off
trying to you know after let's say we've
been meeting since 5 p.m
so six hours in trying to move a little
bit all right
questions for judah and sarah as
representatives of cbrc
anybody have anything for them tonight
that was a great presentation i really
appreciate it
i like how you laid it out um and give
us a good overview and give us
some things to think about between now
and
our our approval and adoption
it was almost as good as back in the day
when rito and i were on the cbrc
04h 55m 00s
i just yeah that's the problem with
following legends
you know what i'm not do i'm not
following you onto the school board
uh anytime soon leave that up to other
people
you didn't read the uh fine print on
when you signed
there's a welcome path so i i do have a
question and then michelle will go after
you director bailey
oh okay um so you know the cuts
in uh central office staff
uh when i ran the numbers
that are in the proposed budget book
for general fund and
uh the special grants fund and you know
the operating budget basically it looked
to me
like at least as as i defined central
office staff
and we can go over the gory details
that was pretty constant percentage uh
of the proposed budget with this past
year
so uh offline maybe i just want to bring
that up
and uh we we can explore that further
because we may have different
definitions that was actually a number
from
claire at the last meeting and perhaps
we had a misunderstanding
uh there but um she may be able to
clarify
yeah well and that may be general fund
versus
a broader definition
i also wanted to appreciate sarah and
judah
your report made me want to start
attending those meetings i was just
it was really great to get the
distillation of
this
in that quick 10-minute presentation um
i particularly liked
um much of the time when we get
presented to we get
all the great things like it's it's
always just like roses and
beautiful and it's positive and i think
it helps us as board members to hear
the challenges and the barriers the
difficulties and what we did about them
and i think you laid that out really
well so thank you so much
for your service to the community and
and for your help to me tonight
understanding this i i have a quick
question
as well is is the um
is your report available online i
haven't checked
is that available for the public to view
your your recommendations it should be
with the materials uh with the
meeting materials also i should note um
i'm not going to read it out loud unless
people really want to
there is a review of the local option
levy and how the money was spent
last year so that so that i want to
direct people there
because there are some updates because
it uh encompasses now
the renewed levy so it's a different
measure and some slightly different
assumptions built into it yeah
if i may just jump and quickly director
to pass and and
say that as i rounded out the reading of
that report i did
and hadn't read it out loud previous i
did reflect too that we focused a lot on
constructive
feedback and i hope um i hope
the final remarks that um judah shared
you know adequately expressed a lot of
the appreciation and a lot of the bright
spots we saw in the budget i think as a
committee represented you know as
representatives of
um you know community largely parents of
school-age kids
now i think we really grounded our
review of the budget and our lived
experiences as well as the numbers we
were seeing
and felt um like we wanted to design and
orient the report
to align with that and also in response
to a set of questions that i
i believe were compiled um you know by
director moore but came
from board members and so hopefully that
came through as well there were
three specific questions that were big
questions so we
addressed them from a variety of
different perspectives but um i think
that may also be why
um the report feels very grounded and
sort of constructive noticings and
observations and less
the bright spots and and there are many
yes thank you
it felt very balanced to me
thanks i really want to
honor judah and sarah for leading the
process
they've done a phenomenal job this year
um
really um love shanice's partnership
and helping us recruit members
and to the committee so we're seeing a
more
a higher number of um diverse members of
our community
in in the process and their voice is
very
validating and supportive of of the
especially our racial equity and social
justice work and so it was really
a nice tenor throughout the process and
05h 00m 00s
so
really judah and sarah a job well done
it's a big group with lots of
ideas and opinions and your report
reflects
a well-run process and
really caught captured the thinking of
the whole team of the whole committee so
thank you for your work
agreed um i have a quick question
um with regard to the the equity funds
so sarah i think you spoke to that
so there's a comment about how the
um the school profiles show what the
allocations are by school but that you
would have liked to have seen
i i think what you're getting at is what
you would have liked to have seen
is more of a connection to district-wide
strategies
um or tell me tell me what that that
caveat
um is really meant to convey sure
so we had a lot of conversation about
this and it's not the first year we've
had this conversation i think
we um understand the way that the equity
allocation is being delivered to schools
and can follow them
the dollars that way based on need but
don't have a good understanding at the
school level of how those dollars are
being invested in ways that materially
matter to students and the opposite of
what i think is
you know community we'd love to be able
to see more transparently
what schools are choosing to spend their
allocation
on and be able to connect that to impact
on student outcomes
and as a as a concrete example
of that when superintendent guerrero
first joined which was
a very tumultuous budget year uh
you have yet to have a normal year one
of these days superintendent guru you're
going to get a
normal budget year i swear and it will
be a good one but
there was that's when we started
bringing in the uh equity allocation
and there was materials uh shared where
each of the
principals for the equity allocation
said this is
how we this is what we want to do with
it like hiring like
reading tutors and on such and bringing
on fte to do
and immersive things in order to improve
say third grade grade rating um you know
scores
and then being then able we understood
at the time that like okay
this point there's there is a big thing
of saying
okay nobody's going to get punished
we're all trying these experiments to
see
how we're going to get better together
and then we want to track the outcomes
over the years like
did that like did your program work the
way you hoped it would
you know or and if some other school had
a program that worked better
maybe we should pair you up and share
you know and that was the intention
behind those
um that my understanding in inquiring
about those since then has
been the internally that sort of work
has continued
um but that information has not
continued to
uh be shared and so that's the kind of
really good equity-based
work that you know we say we want to
have data-driven decisions
we want to focus on equity and we want
to have transparency as a value
like that was great and so to see that
sort of
go away after such a promising start was
disappointing to me
jude that was a great explanation and
that's a really good point and i think
we do know that there are more
guidelines for building leaders on how
those equity
funds can be used but we haven't closed
the loop we haven't done either the
things that you
or we haven't seen maybe they've been
done but we haven't seen either of the
things you mentioned
which is both transparency
around those strategies and then the the
comparisons and the sharing of best
practices
that's a really really good call out you
guys
um i think my just my only other comment
that i had to make um
really really appreciate your report um
thank you for picking up on the
communication that we've had from
our community-based alternative programs
and kind of recognizing what i consider
to be an
inequity in our current funding model
there
i thank you for for heeding their
communication that went directly to you
and also appreciate the peace on the
custodial standards this was something
that has come up in our own discussions
and um i think we
we have we do have an elevated standard
claire would you like to unveil that
elevated standard
actually in in the response we got from
ops is they're
actually expanding what they're doing so
i really would like um
dan young um to come back and and frank
lovett
to share that with you and because it
05h 05m 00s
they are actually
um um going the next step
of evaluating um what uh how the
solutions for the issue so
so more to come well we will still hang
tight on that but
we are just not thrilled
to emerge from moderately dingy
i just want to make sure then each of
those sort of similar
uh recommendations it's not trying to
imply that we're
um funding these things inadequately
it's just genuinely like
we don't know like that we're not sure
what the standards are how many
like what uh should it be do we have
good guidelines
for our planning and so really it's not
trying to cast any aspersions certainly
but it's really more trying to focus in
on that data-driven decisions and
transparency point
um and speaking of transparency i am on
the website
i don't see a link to the cbrc
annual review the five-page document
it's absolutely in the board book
but i don't see it posted for the public
which was maybe i wasn't clear when i
asked
is it available anywhere for the public
to view
i think it's in the board materials uh
tab
correct roseanne well i
it is publicly available on the poor
materials
um i'm not finding it um i'm
i'm on the pps the board page
um there are links to the meeting
themselves with the agendas
in two places but i don't see the the
documentation
what i'm hearing you say michelle is
that that i agree with you that it's
important that the cbrc letter be
public and so can we ask ms powell to
follow up and make sure that that
document is
accessible to the public or
share a link um i'm just i've gotten a
couple requests now
it's typically also posted on the cbsc
um
page on the pps website and
if it's not there now i'm i assume it
will be
shortly okay thank you but i didn't know
i didn't realize
so i'll just i'll add my voice my voice
of praise um to the work i think it's
very clear and i love the concrete
recommendations i've
been a part of lots of citizen reviews
of budgets and and uh often you don't
get
that level of clarity so thank you for
that um and specifically
i i i really appreciate that you called
out the need um you know to
to both hire and retain um teachers of
color i would i would add staff to that
as well teachers and staff of color
and i wanted you know that issues come
up tonight already i i want to actually
tie that back to
to to administrative funding which you
also note and i think you probably did
tie this you know in your review but the
way we do that is by funding
administrators who do that work right
and and help with the outreach and the
recruitment and the retention and the
engagement and
and so just it's a reminder that all
these things is an ecosystem and so
often particularly in school funding
um it happens everywhere but
particularly in schools you know this
this central administration gets up gets
a bad rap
um even in the the oregonian article
last you know last week sort of it ends
with this weird paragraph about
you know oh but this many millions of
dollars goes to its central
administration
and and not recognizing that that is so
important to the overall ecosystem of a
school
and to the extent we underfund that for
political reasons we actually are
underfunding the success of our students
and so i just
really appreciate you you calling that
out very directly so thanks
all right again thank you to our cbrc
team and especially to judah and sarah
both for the lateness of the hour and
for the thoroughness of that report
um we have much to consider and uh we'll
see
folks back from cbrc uh next year when
we have a super
normal budget year right judah that's
what you promised us
that that's uh i i think i'm the problem
so you know i'll just like take myself
out
like i'm the bad luck i'm the bad luck
charm i've long thought that judah
um judah and i went to high school
together for those of you that don't
know so we've known each other a long
time
um all right we're gonna say if we're
gonna have a normal budget year
perhaps we could um encourage the
superintendent to take a vacation day
yes i actually just approved a couple
vacation days for the superintendent
which is very exciting
um so i i think we've got a strategy for
what to do next in this meeting
i'm going to turn it over to deputy
hertz if that's cool with superintendent
guerrero
um to just ask a couple questions of the
board and get some board response
so that we can continue to move forward
in our budgeting process does that
sound like i captured it correctly
claire
yes we had a riveting presentation
prepared by
chief financial officer nebacho
delgadillo and
um because it is almost well let's see
it's 1 30 in the morning
for him we've decided that would be a
bad time for him to present
and truly you have received all the
05h 10m 00s
materials
we were trying to highlight some things
from our last meeting that came as
questions
you've received all the information and
we've shared
it in you know so there's nothing new
that we were going to present
but we would look like to open it up for
maybe a half an hour discussion with the
board
to um just close out um
you know any lingering questions any
additional things that we need before we
come back
um for an approval at our next board
meeting
all right so we're gonna just uh popcorn
um
and we're gonna we have half an hour so
if you have any lingering questions
about the budget that you need
answered in this public forum i'm gonna
go ahead and ask you to do those now
um cool i'm just gonna start by saying
like i'm too tired i'll i'll send them
tomorrow
so me too julia my brain is
me three but i i do still feel like
there's some substantive stuff we need
to address and i'm gonna just go back to
my
structural issue that i raised last time
which um i did
we did get something back that gave us a
little more definition
around tying the strategies
to the esser allocations but it's it's
not a narrative and it's not
it's not very much detail so we can
follow up
this week on that i think it's a really
really important piece of our budget to
to be able to have that up front and to
clearly communicate
with our communities what we're doing um
i still haven't seen that
even though i got a little bit of the
underlying information there
and um and then just also we'll want to
follow up on the
um alternative um our community based
alternative schools i did get a
t a uh spreadsheet from mr delgadillo
that
in the teeniest tiniest of fonts that i
believe showed quite
a difference in the proposed uh
21 22 allocation there which leads me to
believe that someone is considering
making a change but i'd like to
um revisit that so but
yeah let's we're going to have to do
this later
but i think that was a perfect thing
director constant there something that
you really need that you wanted to raise
up so are there other
folks that have similar things they want
to put out there that they need for the
budget process
um our meeting on the 25th will be when
we vote on
the um uh budget so
what we're basically saying is what is
there sorry
next meeting the we will vote on the
budget on june 15th
that is the adoption vote um the
20 the budget amendment vote is the 25th
and claire what is
what does the budget we approved the
budget
for 2122 on at the next board meeting
and we also are approving an amendment
to the
2021 budget year and then we
have a hearing with a tscc
and then we have the uh vote for the
adoption
sorry i am looking at the board tracker
and getting we're all good
we're all good so basically this is our
um last regularly scheduled meeting to
ask questions about the budget
um i think that the question is
are we um going to need
another board discussion or are the
questions that we can ask now or email
insufficient
just my perspective is we should have
some time at the next meeting to have a
discussion about any remaining issues
i mean i'm not good i can come up with
my list of questions tonight but
i don't think anybody wants to go
through that so but
so my question is julia the next meeting
is when we're voting
on the budget so is that sufficient time
for you i know you like to have a lot of
lead time between
well my guess one thing i would say is
hopefully we'll have more than 20
minutes on the
we had an hour on the agenda for this
item but again we that was
yeah it's okay i don't want to belabor
everybody i'm i'm sure i'll be fine
i'll ask my questions um
i'm just not gonna do it now i think the
tension for me is always that we want to
be thoughtful and take sufficient time
with items and we have a lot of items to
get through and we don't want to be in
meetings till midnight so
how do we find that sweet spot of
getting us what we need but also moving
through our agenda
in a way that gets the work of the um
school district done so that's the
05h 15m 00s
tension i'm feeling as we talk about
you know frustration about this being so
late and yet trying to allow time for
everyone to get their questions out and
sit with items and absorb it
it's this constant um it's a difficult
thing to navigate so what i'm trying to
ask
is what do we need just the same
question claire is what do we as a board
need
to successfully be able to vote on the
budget at the next meeting because that
is the timeline we have with our tscc
hearing
and to be really clear sorry just just
to add to be really clear the budget has
to be approved
on the 25th so unlike other items that
we can put off there is no putting that
off so
i i appreciate your question director
lowry or chair lowry i think it's
good to make sure that everyone is
comfortable coming to that you know
meeting prepared to vote
all right so what i'm i'm not hearing
anyone ask for another meeting so we're
going to ask questions tonight we're
going to ask questions in emails
we're going to have some discussion at
the next meeting and then we are going
to vote
and we are going to limit that
discussion to
it's not going to be a three-hour
discussion on the budget it's going to
be
30 minutes to an hour so what do we need
tonight between now
and the 25th to make sure we're ready
for that budget vote
that's the point one thing i would ask
is if we can
please share all the questions and
answers
among all of us because we have many
areas of
overlap and our interests and concerns
we have been
yeah i really appreciated the um table
that was sent in the
in the board packet last week um just to
see the questions and the responses and
the links right there was really helpful
and we want to um you know the we
publish them also for the
community so we share them with all of
you and we publish them for the
community
can i make maybe one suggestion for this
the the question document um so we've
gotten this
tonight um
maybe if you could um
signify somehow new questions that come
in
after tonight um just to make it a
little bit easier to
to sort out what you've already answered
and
what would be new info for those of us
reading it
maybe the older responses could be
somewhat grayed out a bit
not not to make it a little illegible
but i don't know how easy
that would be if you're adding into the
table so we'll make sure it's clear
for all of you thank you for the
suggestion
all right anything else before we
adjourn tonight
i do want to clarify for the approval of
the budget
it's um so as the questions come out if
we're needing to modify the budget we'll
need
a couple of days to do that so it'll be
important that the questions come in
quickly and that we respond to them
quickly as we're rolling up the budget
because
um we we if we make try to make changes
in the meeting
with um and trying to calculate that in
the meeting that's not a um
that's not something i would recommend i
would recommend that we post
what we're going to be voting on based
on um
making sure we get the questions
answered
and if there's um an error found or
something that needs to be corrected
then we'll make sure that we get that
correction in and
and explain that in our documentation
and
also explain it in the public meeting
claire
can i also uh and this is a suggestion
both for
for you but also for chair lowry that if
there are amendments that board members
feel like they need to bring forward
they think about bringing those forward
as part of the adopted budget
so that's actually a process that that
we use
at metro and along the county does as
well
most most of the amendments get
consolidated down into the adopted
budget there are some limitations
if they're really large amendments but
um given where we are in terms of this
process
and and the need to move forward with
the approved budget um you know
sometimes it's more useful just
to ha and that gives more time frankly
for other board members of the public to
to think about those amendments as well
and and we can make those as part of the
adopted process
sorry claire did you say that we're
approving the budget and then we're
doing an amendment to this year's budget
is that what you said that is correct
and what is i mean have we had any
information if i missed it or do we have
received any information yet but it will
come in your next packet there's things
that we've gotten funding during the
year that we didn't know
before the beginning of the year there
have been needs and changes that have
had to happen because of the pandemic so
we need
05h 20m 00s
to true up um there's also the per
not the purse bonds the geo bonds and
the debt service that we
for bonds we sold in december so we just
need there's
um i i don't have a list in front of me
at 11 30 at night but there are
things that are um clean up from this
year
and so we'll make sure that you have
plenty of time to review that
i guess i would ask since that's a whole
new thing
that we don't just get it in our
thursday packet because
we'll have a whole bunch of other things
in that thursday packet if it's at all
maybe we need to move it to another
meeting because i
the team is working very hard to do both
those items and to
get that out earlier just probably is
probably not possible
need to be done earlier i mean does it
need to be done at the next meeting
because that may be like the mercy
rule for everybody's like if it doesn't
have to be done
it's just not adding a whole another
thing on top of it
we could move it to the um first meeting
in june
i say call the mercy rule and like do it
in the first meeting in june just i mean
it just seems like on top of
i'm sorry do you wanted the first
meeting in june the budget amendment so
i think
i i guess can i just i think the the
only thing that's that's a
i guess the question there uh is this a
standard uh technical
spring supplemental budget which is very
normal government
um you know in terms of karyos over or
is there something more substantive
going on and
yes i i would defer to staff on that if
you want to if you want to just defer it
into june that's fine but i also think
is bored we need to accept that
this is a normal part of budgeting i
think we do this every year usually
these are very technical amendments in
the spring that just have to be done
um prior to the close of the fiscal year
so i would hope we don't get too caught
up
in that when there are much more
important issues going on
we will take this up at agenda setting
tomorrow and have a further conversation
about this
which is a reminder that we do have
agenda setting tomorrow so please get
your agenda items in before 11.
anything else before we adjourn tonight
yeah my battery's gonna
die i move for adjournment
do i have a second yes indeed
all right anything else we need before
adjournment all right then we are
adjourned
on adjournment now we are on adjournment
now we are adjourned
uh our next meeting will be uh may 25th
at 6pm
um thank you to all the staff for
weathering this lengthy meeting and
thank you to my board colleagues for
hanging in there as we did this very
very important work tonight
Sources
- PPS Board of Education, BoardBook Public View, https://meetings.boardbook.org/Public/Organization/915 (accessed: 2023-01-25T21:27:49.720701Z)
- PPS Communications, "Board of Education" (YouTube playlist), https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8CC942A46270A16E (accessed: 2023-10-10T04:10:04.879786Z)
- PPS Communications, "PPS Board of Education Meetings" (YouTube playlist), https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbZtlBHJZmkdC_tt72iEiQXsgBxAQRwtM (accessed: 2023-10-14T01:02:33.351363Z)
- PPS Board of Education, PPS Board of Education - Full Board Meetings (YouTube playlist), https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLk0IYRijyKDW0GVGkV4xIiOAc-j4KVdFh (accessed: 2023-10-11T05:43:28.081119Z)