2016-02-17 PPS School Board Regular Meeting

From SunshinePPS Wiki
District Portland Public Schools
Date 2016-02-17
Time missing
Venue missing
Meeting Type regular
Directors Present missing


Documents / Media

Notices/Agendas

Materials

Minutes

Transcripts

Event 1: Board of Education - Regular Meeting - February 17, 2016

00h 00m 00s
very 17th is called order I'd like to extend a warm welcome to everybody here and to our television viewers any item that will be voted on this evening has been posted and required by state law this meeting is being televised live and will be replayed throughout the next two weeks miss Huson are there any students signed up for a student testimony none okay do we have anybody sign up for public comment we do we have Chan okay and our first two speakers are Beth shields and Brian unflattering if we have a student that would like to come up we'll start with a student welcome go ahead and state your name my I can't eat of it my name is Zoe Jacobs claim a seventh-grader Spanish Immersion student at West Sylvan my little sister is a third grade Spanish Immersion student at ainsworth i was at ainsworth for six years throughout my time there we did many activities with the English side we ate lunch and had recess did samba the Portland played this town the arts times and book fairs buckaroo and form friendships together having the English and Spanish sides together has given has given us all the opportunity to learn more about different cultures I think Spanish Immersion should stay I ain't what where it has been for 30 years at ainsworth thank you for thinking of a different and better way to solve the overcrowding in the west side thank you nice job all right Beth shields and Brian on flat Oh welcome go ahead hi hi I'm when I secured this position to speak before the board d Brock had just revealed scenario 2 a and I obviously felt a strong need to speak up from my neighborhood and four children being kept at schools whose geography topography and proximity to find their belonging I feel like this message was heard and I would like to thank d Brock and the board members for your countless hours in careful consideration i've had three children's go through three children go through the community site at ainsworth to date that puts me at ten years at the school for the record I never applied to immersion program for any of my children over the last weeks i have watched things play out while remaining relatively quiet i stood up for my community and the right for neighborhood kids to have access to their neighborhood schools and then took a seat but i feel compelled to speak out now as over the last several days i witnessed immersion parents actively petitioning on and now around school grounds posting signatures from parents and children to support their stay at the school and my intention is not to push anyone else but a letter has been sent out attached to this petition stating ainsworth is one school ends with SI is not a separate program and part of this is accurate ainsworth is one school and I understand that families and kids believe in an equal belonging to the school but these are two very different programs housed within its walls this is just simple fact in first grade my son was in a classroom of 36 kids at the start of the year one teacher no aid an effort to manage the class size the teacher began farming kids out holding conferences with parents on the twelfth day of school one got put back one that moved up one got moved in to teach Spanish Immersion every day there were kids in the hallways crying the experience was miserable parents were told by the principal and foundation that there was no money for an aide that it would be illegal to use Foundation funds for a TA in the classroom if we wanted an aid we as parents who have to come up with the money ourselves it was a lost year for my son he has been diagnosed with an anxiety disorder that makes it difficult to speak up in a classroom especially when were the teachers at her wits end and kids are
00h 05m 00s
packed in like sardines meanwhile down the hallway Spanish Immersion has classes cats and hasn't aid and even an intern in the room sometimes two years later it was revealed that aids within the school should have been allocated evenly between the two programs I don't know how to speak to this and to the best of my knowledge while attention was called to the problem it was not remedy in our team at ainsworth my children have been in blended classrooms with 34 to 38 kids sometimes more even the best teachers have been overwhelmed and struggled to teach appropriate curriculum meanwhile haces cap classrooms and aids inequities and conflicts come into play when funding for resources and specialists for both programs are pulled from one foundation pot the nature of the spanish immersion program simply demands more from our school and community often gets left the short end of the stick and I know this is not emergence fault ainsworth has run headfirst into the obvious problem of a focus option program being co-located collocate in public schools as our populations grow and the community classrooms absorb these large numbers this is an issue that will come up time and again for Ainsworth's Ainsworth regardless of what happens or how the chips fall I think this is an opportunity to look at ourselves as a community and address these conflicts with great humility optimism and perspective and find a way to make ourselves better weather remain in one building or somebody moves this is an opportunity to look at how immersion programs function in the PPS system and perhaps change the model so they serve the whole school teaching according to skill and fluency rather than a grade level the immersion program is a wonderful program with many strong and wonderful people who contribute to its success and I really feel it is right in celebrating itself but I have to stand up and say that this shouldn't happen at the expense of neighborhood kids thank you my name is brian flatt and I'm a parent of the Southwest school district I've three children that go to Ricky go to Robert gray and we'll be going to Wilson's all three in September each of those three schools tonight I want to share my thoughts of many but not all over southwest community regarding the implications proposed by the D brat boundary shifts past several months have left lasting positive and some negative impressions there have been mentions of exclusivity segregation and intent of focused programs the latter was not developed to segregate it was established to integrate however some have recently implied that segregation is a byproduct of this proposal we respectfully disagree our schools aren't successful because of what where they are located they are successful because of what their unique communities students and employees put into them we hope that those currently contributed to their school's success will remain committed regardless of movement now or in the future we all support the success of focused programs but not if they take precedence over accessibility to community schools let's not confuse the difference between focused programs and special need programs the growth of one is a nice to have the preservation of the other is a must have the current to be proposal was developing a community crowdsourcing hours of meetings and hundreds of constructive recommendations it was not the result of backroom deals secret meetings and implied favoritism but somewhere along the way it is divided communities threaten relationships and impeded progress towards a much bigger picture want to encourage all of us to evaluate the root cause of these necessary boundary changes and realize that it isn't the fault of our schools or the communities who attend them it is a result of our city's growing pains lack of resources to plan for long-term infrastructure and not learning from our past I hope we all recognize that change isn't coming it is here and more will be on the way if we don't focus on a united front rather than our disparate ways thanks to all who continue to conduct themselves with decorum during this period of change we will continue to support being conduit with Portland planning transportation and urban growth organizations to get bond measures passed to help solve our underlying growth issues for the long-term keeping Portland amazing city we all call home thank you very much thank you next we have Lisa Hanson and Holly Ingram
00h 10m 00s
welcome how could my name is Lisa Hanson with an e non oh and thank you for giving me this opportunity to speak tonight about the boundary change proposals I am a mother to a rambunctious kindergartner it ain't worth and our family has been a part of the homestead ohsu neighborhood for the past 18 years although with a kindergartner we are a new family to the Ainsworth elementary community my daughter is a part of the community program our homestead neighborhood strongly supports keeping children at their local schools we were horrified at the domino effect that was on the table when proposal to a was considered as it would have driven our neighborhood as well as council crest and green hills neighborhoods out of our local school to other schools that were marked much harder to reach the effect of transferring children into new schools with feeder patterns is incredibly disruptive to students particularly those during transitions I know this firsthand from watching my own daughter gets switched from one kindergarten class to another after the first week of school we were informed of the change on Friday allowing us the weekend to prepare Allison for this change even though she had only five days of school under her belt at ainsworth we were wrong to think how easy this transition would be many tears were shed that weekend I did it and it took a long period of transition to get Alison back to where she felt secure in her classroom and could look towards the future at the perfect certainty seeing how the Ainsworth community was originally affected by proposal to way this brought back memories of our kindergarten transition luckily for Alison's dubreq realized the importance of keeping neighborhood communities together and as a result proposal to be was created unfortunately other kids were now in a similar situation to ours we believe that the top priority for these boundary proposals should be to keep school communities together intact as much as possible the ainsworth community was particularly harshly affected by proposal teeway transportation was a major issue for our community with that proposal as kids from council crest in green hills would have to be transferred from a walkable school to a difficult to reach Ricky homestead which contains ohsu as well as three other major hospital systems is often massively congested with hospital commuter traffic and the route straight up the hill to ainsworth in Lincoln is the only direction from homestead that remains uncongested at these times the homestead neighborhood is an often overlooked area that comprises Ainsworth that comprises Ainsworth largest community neighborhood group of minorities bringing socio-economic and ethnic diversity to the Ainsworth community homestead has the highest percentage of minority residents out of all of Southwest Portland's Ainsworth catchment homestead also has the largest proportion of renters about fifty nine percent this is two to three times as much as the rest of ainsworth's Southwest Portland catchment my own daughters community kindergarten class overwhelmingly reflects lists out of 26 students eight are minorities seven of whom live in the homestead neighborhood out of these kids five out of seven live in rental and within this group languages other than English are spoken at home and my time is up i assume i will finally conclude i'm going to skip over something things but what I just wanted to end with there is some other things saying that I personally don't approve of proposals to a a to be but what I want to conclude is that I acknowledge the challenges that you the school board face in trying to solve the problem caused by the residential development and subsequent school overcrowding in Northwest Portland and thank you and d Rock for your commitment to all the students in Portland I would I would like to ask that you I would like to ask that as you prepare the final boundary change proposal you bide by the Portland school board policy that all PPS students have the right to attend their neighborhood school and take this into account the importance of neighborhoods school accessibility and equity that are significant for the ainsworth school community thank you and those of you that that brought written comments like yourself if you could leave them with Karen and then we'll ask appaman I can re refer to him so thank you what do you mean and board members superintendent Smith PBS staff and fellow community members my name is holly Ingram and I'm the president of the PTA a tricky elementary and a proud PBS employee I'm here tonight anticipation of your decision you will make about how to redraw district boundaries well I know superintendent Smith has not presented you a recommendation I request that you should consider the following framework as you build the proposal around her proposal first and foremost leave no school under serve our hope is that no school in this process ends up under enrolled and the risks risks losing services if this
00h 15m 00s
isn't evitable please provide a plan of additional funding to maintain programming and services for under-enrolled schools in current scenario for to be both Hayhurst and bribed a mile or at risk ironically right a mile and hayhurst if they're right sized along with Ricky feed into Robert gray then they will be over capacity at gray with wilson also over capacity we need to clearly think about enhanced middle school facilities and in the near term and long term second provide continuity for our kids kudos for superintendent Smith smoothing parents fears by announcing her recommendation to include grab the grandfathering we ask you to enhance this by enabling elementary school students to stay in their current feeder patterns through high school so they can continue to grow with their current cohorts third keep neighborhoods hold as you consider the new boundaries please consider our natural neighborhoods and prioritize walk ability for students students currents walking zones Maps provide a thoughtful anchor anchor if school focus school programs must be really ok today bourhood growth let's make sure they have fantastic facilities and support which they'll thrive and finally an appeal to all of you concerned parents as well as friends who have been involved in this process we are observing a challenging time for Portland Public Schools while there is no easy to way to do it address the specific challenges that come with Portland's rapid growth I'm disheartened to see just how far the rebounding process has driven wedges into our community parents are lashing out one another dividing our speculation and fear way too many hours are being spent on social media and at meetings instead of with our kids my ask is that we all unite and that you as a school board members lead us through this process betrayer transparent and inclusive shut down the room where Mills agree to not cut special deals behind doors and let's work together to make PBS schools great thank you next we have Lori Lyons lachman and Rosie plaque hi my name is Lori Loughlin I have a fourth grader at beach school in the neighborhood side and I am a proud Jefferson cluster parent I appreciate the hours and thoughtful deliberations that deep rack members and staff have put into a dressing over in under-enrolled schools inequitable programming and K aids throughout the district as you know the 2012 Jefferson cluster enrollment balancing resulted in resolution 4718 that closed off the green focus option to create a to campus k-8 with Chief Joe as a k3 and ugly green as a 48 it also developed the D brag to address enrollment issues in alignment with a racial education equity policy and increased neighborhood school capture rates and balanced enrollment throughout the district since then our cluster has been working together to plan the reopening of a middle schools since many of our K aids have consistently failed to provide equitable education opportunities or even the full core program for middle squared students we have patiently waited and are prepared to support this change now d Brack recommended that oakley green open as a middle school in fall of 2016 representatives throughout our schools in the Jefferson cluster have vetted these recommendations in a variety of forums and fully supported I ask that you vote on this recommendation at your februari twenty-third board meeting even if that means uncoupling it from the remaining recommendations administrators staff and stakeholders believe that oakley grain can open as a strong and cohesive middle school in fall of 2016 with beach Chief Joseph and woodland as feeders this configuration solves a series of problems it relieves acute overcrowding at beach the sixth and eighth grade students feeding into oakley maintain the Jefferson and Roosevelt dual enrollment boundary it provides critical core and elective programming to more students it accommodates all currently enrolled students in grade five through seven at
00h 20m 00s
be chief Joe and woodlawn and provides a year planning time to right-size their boundaries as k 5s going forward we have developed a draft transition and implementation plan that addresses staff staffing models community building PBIS partnership development transportation and capital investments this transition planning needs to start immediately we have a historic opportunity for PPS in our Jefferson cluster community to partner together on a shared and positive solution that will immediately increase opportunities for our students over a decade of inequalities or iniquity sorry we look forward to continuing our engagement with you to open a second middle school in our cluster the harriet tubman middle school for the 2017-18 school year thank you hello my name is Rosie plaid I'm the PTA president at Chapman ever since D Brax final recommendation at Carol Smith the west side has entered a new stage of division amongst communities with rumors private meetings with no public input or meeting or minutes shared Chapman leaders have not participated or endorsed any ideas coming from these meetings that may be presented to the board board members have also participated in these meetings which of course they encouraged to do in order to educate themselves on the various concerns of Westside families rules were developed by D Brack and approved by the board in October of 2015 that states further proposals developed by any stakeholder including community members d brac members district staff or board members that impacts communities and not seeking feedback from those impacted communities lies in direct violation of resolution 5149 as we move forward I hope to see communities revert back to this high level of transparency and that the school board continues with the same level as was conducted with the D brac meetings including community feedback from all affected parties in the event that a new scenario is put on the table scenario 2 beam does address the overcrowding at Chapman and we support the proposal with adjustments to help maintain programming at under-enrolled schools and the inclusion of the Willamette Heights neighborhood at Chapman which is located at the farthest north west corner of our catchment I have heard that moving portions of Chapman to the east side irvington and Boise Elliot are potential parts of new scenarios created by community members moving Chapman to the east side effects bridge traffic loss of walkability in an area where many inner-city families really do walk and many do not own cars also being aware of relocating the most vulnerable students as homeless shelters and most of Chapman's affordable family housing units would be potentially affected finally in the east side is experiencing enormous growth as well and their boundary issues have not been addressed there are a lot of variables and data that would need to be thoroughly evaluated first it is hard to imagine that busing Chapman neighborhood children to the east side would be considered over relocating a non neighborhood program that is in the heart of the northwest the area with the largest projected growth it was brought up back in November that eighty-five percent of mlc students are from the east side it seems like this should still be on the table for consideration when the ripple effect throughout the west side due to Chapman's overcrowding will potentially negatively affect many neighborhood schools PBS stated two reasons not to located mlc and convert the couch building into a neighborhood school one that there are not enough students to support to Northwest schools chapman in the couch building however however a significant flaw of to be is creating similar problems with bridal milan Hayhurst under-enrolled and the growth of the pearl isn't slowing down to i understand that the community is the classroom for mlc students and an urban environment is needed for the curriculum but there are other urban areas with vacant schools within the city a short bus ride away from downtown this entire process has illuminated the inequalities of schools and programs throughout the city as the boundary process enters this next phase PBS needs to focus on equity all students should have equal access to everything from languages to small class sizes two specials regardless of the building size or school population after this boundary change my final request is that the commitment to transparency and community involvement continues throughout this next process thank you our next two speakers are a video Garcia and Jeannie savage
00h 25m 00s
welcome hi go ahead thank you my name is Rudy Garcia I'm my children in Spanish Immersion program I let me start with a few facts about a program eighty percent of the ends worth historically underserved population is part of the Spanish Immersion historically in this herb is currently twenty five percent of the immersion program and thanks to the lottery changes isn't trying to be above thirty percent by 2017 our community contains families from at least 13 different countries including Mexico Argentina Chile Spain kooba Bolivia Colombia and El Salvador we value our diversity as a critical part of the program and the character of school historically underserved population is only six point six in the English program and the immersion programs a key component of providing the diversity at ainsworth I was troubled and none of the evaluation criteria might aid in by the PPS racial equity lens were addressed by the deeper act should be proposal perhaps that was because there was only 48 hours to evaluate the proposal before voting and at that time there was zero focus outreach to the historical desert community and native speakers impacted in direct violation of the PPA is racial educational equity policy section F we serve our community and ninety-three percent opposed to be ninety two percent say is II Sylvan will be more difficult to access ninety-five percent believe this will impact their children in a negative way the war has said focus options I quote actively seek to create a sense of community with which racial economic and cultural isolation and reduced a proposal that isolates eighty percent of the historical underserved population in two separate facility is difficult to reconcile with those values this program has 30 years of excess with diverse populations with children that are thriving integrated in this school why we put in all this a risk I often get the question well then what is your proposal but every citizens must can propose ideas but is a belief of my community that those solutions must be fairly interest annually vetted another process that should be led by private citizens how can we advocate for something that hasn't been assessed with my community's reluctant to Reese perpetrating the very ingested that has been forced on us while PPS takes the time to create long-term solutions i believe there are better sir x options based on current under Roman insert in surrounding schools and nobody romaine Chapman can be fully absorbed by the boundary of website schools without exceeding a class of 28 just like the spanish immersion classes at ainsworth why not reduce the over carbon Hayhurst an odyssey in the 2016 in state within a year why live vital mei-ling's what we sat and under Roman while the spanish immersion moves out there was enough website emerging the man last year to support a full four strand elementary school in the west side so please create a Wilson clustering mission option taking pressure of Lincoln in the future if we want to respect grandfathering compelling voluntary options are the fastest way to drive change why would impede why wouldn't this be the first things we consider instead of the last the scenario to chew a chubby have two things in common they were massively disrupted and then don't solve the problem our data shows that Chapman would be overcrowded within a few years so lean for the problem long term should be merged with the ongoing district-wide analysis for 2017 so we can look at the problem holistically above all let's learn from our mistakes with chewy don't rush be transparent with the community a lot of time for real feedback by affected community principals and teachers be consistent with the system policies and please don't fall into the trap of believing that devices social media performance are representative of public sentiment please look past those loud voices and to understand the overall sentiment that really represents the interest of a whole community we will certainly value the opportunity to engage with the board members and work through more viable solutions that should be I will I will be remiss if I didn't close bipolar thinking Alex Perry member of the Latino network and lone dissenting de Burgh member that should be and thank you for your efforts and all your work welcome I my name is Jeannie savage and I'm from bride a mile and I have a son in the eighth grade at West Sylvan and I have two daughters it brought a mile Elementary in 2nd 4th grade I'm a family physician and I deliver babies and I also work in a community health centers serving mostly the Latino population so I'm here basically for two main points I'm more nervous now so excuse me for trembling a bit first of all we have 32 children at West Sylvan that have been slightly overlooked and we have planned to go to Lincoln for I since third grade moving here on our third graders son's best friend lives across the street and
00h 30m 00s
we've been incorporated with the Lincoln brand since then we played basketball for Lincoln at third fourth fifth grade and then to put continue that these plans have been laid down and these kids have had expectations I agree that that moving hastily forward with any plan is is not a good idea I've left a handout out there that I would like you to refer to to kind of go through the reasons why I don't think to be works and the reason why many people up here other reasons that many people have already stayed in I do I just have one thing really to say and going forward I think it's important that any plan takes into the highest regard what happens to the children and I know that seems obvious but I think it's really important that we don't leave out just those 32 that we look and we see what their lives were like it's a big transition in adolescence I know from talking with kids that if you ask them why they tend to make good decisions is because their friends are with them if you take 32 and separate them out you go directly against what you've said you would do and you make it tough on these kids my my other mother reason to talk this evening is for the under enrollment issue i think it's been covered i think that it's not good to to create any plan that takes away from the success of other schools I agree with change I think change needs to happen I don't think anybody in my community is against change but I think it needs to be done thoughtfully I think it needs to be done collaboratively and I think that the energy that has been created by this whole process is amazing look at all these people who are out there participating in this community event that is what I'm thankful for and thankful that my son is up here seeing it and and I'm thankful that you're listening and please take into account everything that everybody said let these kids go through they deserve it it's the right thing to do you'll be following your directives and you'll you'll feel good about yourself thank you thank you and lastly we have naira Perez and one rockin thank you um hello my name is Maya Perez and I thank you all for your time and for all your efforts into solving this legal paso that we sell it without a place a tree state your full name yes hello my name is naira perez and thank you so much for all your hard work and for looking at this puzzling topic that we have ahead and I am here to represent ainsworth Spanish Immersion historically underserved population proposal to be specifically targets this population which represents 25% of Si currently the second largest hu school population on the west side in our community their parents whose kids are integrated at ainsworth that have limited access to internet and whose primary language is Spanish parents that won't attend your meetings or go to the PBS website to see if PBS has translated documents into Spanish we feel left out with literally no time to react and be heard we keep hearing that deep Bragg and PPS knows what is best for us without anybody reaching out to us so our community did our own survey and we want to share those results with you so we may no longer be numbers and statistics but voices 93% of our community is opposed to to be the Bragg was told from stuff that the ECB location may offer better access for native spanish-speaking students from other parts of the west side we're here to tell you that ninety-two percent of our community says that that is not true and that actually will be more difficult for them to access the program if relocated we're here to help to tell you that ninety-five percent of our historically underserved population thinks that proposal to be is going to affect our kids negatively some comments from parents are our son will feel like he was being punished for being of Hispanic descent another spanish-speaking parents said my son feels safe at ainsworth now we feel scared we don't know what is going to happen the negative effects are just not are not just psychological but educational to that historically underserved population that ain't were we'll need to choose between following the SI program and join an experiment with lots of uncertainties gambling with the education of their kids or forego the immersion and attend their neighborhood school where they will fall behind academically struggling to keep up there is research that demonstrate
00h 35m 00s
both facts when the superintendent and the board studied this proposal we challenge you to apply the equity lens under the racial educational equity policy which says the district shall create welcoming environments that reflect and support the racial and ethnic diversity of the student population and community I ask you to consider that proposal to be is actually doing the opposite of this it is taken as the ethnic diversity out of ainsworth separating us from our community isolating us as or as one of our Latino parents has said moving us out of sight with a hispanic latino feel like relocating inside out of eggs worth a brutus from a community where we are integrated in the words of one parent my child my children will be singled out they will understand that learning their language will have negative consequences and it is going back in time when speaking Spanish was something that you shouldn't do so you could fit in my son will be taught that he doesn't belong finally I asked you as another parent has asked before that when you think of the impact of this decision don't just look at numbers think about the parents that are not here the ones that you didn't hear from but they are there we are there at Spanish Immersion ain't worth someone's ain't worth thank you so much welcome thank you very much good good good evening my name is Juan Gomez I'm a parent at ainsworth Spanish Immersion and i am going to read a letter to you from another parent from a Spanish Immersion at ainsworth his name is Jorge Padilla unfortunately he couldn't be here tonight with us he's working also I just wanted to mention that this letter has been translated from Spanish as he doesn't speak English I am that parent that PPS refers to the historically underserved that population that PPS is working hard in closing the achievement gap I am that parent whose kids are at Spanish Immersion at ainsworth and that this proposal to be leaves behind I am that parent that can come to the D black or PPS meetings because they don't even know what that means because the communication that we received comes in english i am that parent that doesn't have a driver's license driver's license the one that doesn't have papers and it's afraid to talk i am that parent that leaves far away that lives from far away from ainsworth the one that drives an hour to get to the only spanish immersion program on the west side that parent that made the promise to his kids to embrace their heritage and share it with the community in that community is ain't worth I am that hopeful parent that see his children belong to a community that otherwise they won't have access to I am that parent that PP has called last year to enroll my kids have spanish immersion at ainsworth because PPS told me that it was a successful program and that it will be the best for my kids I am that parent that now it's lost in translation that doesn't understand why we are being marginalized separated from our community and from a flourishing school the one that is left behind after all p ps efforts to reach out to us the one that becomes the brac in PBS numbers and stats we are there at Spanish Immersion at ainsworth we just don't have a voice you won't see us at your meetings we won't write you letters and you will try once again to close the achievement gap that you were close to achieve at spanish immersion at ainsworth please when you make your decision think about that parent that is not here tonight that you didn't hear from we are there we are in and I'm gonna disparate chair curler asked earlier if you did put your testimony in writing will you leave it with Karen just because I will add it to the back of the proposal I give to the board all the testimony that was read here tonight so please leave it so that I can do that and um thank you letter yeah the letters that you just did great ok and then Carol I think it would be good just to for you to describe the next process you've now been handed recommendations ok so I've now received the recommendations from d brac as last as of last Tuesday I will and part of what I go through now I have had an implementation team that's been looking at the proposals as they've been formulated by D Brack and looking to
00h 40m 00s
advise me about what's involved in actually implementing them so what costs will be involved what are the staffing implications what are the curricular and facility implications and like sequencing what money we have available to actually make these things happen and do them with integrity so numbers of things I'm now considering have to do with our ability to implement because the whole goal behind this was to end up with a better product than we currently have so like we're looking at our ability to deliver I will then go through some listening but lit but limited so really looking at the things that were put forward to me by D Brack i will do a listening session on the west side and one on the east side the one on the west side will be really specifically in vut a shin and with good translation for spanish-speaking families but it's open to the entire west side on the east side I want to hear more from specifically Jefferson cluster so it's open to the entire east side but I want to hear Jeff cluster folks in particular in terms of readiness because what I'll be trying to weigh is the urgency against what kind of planning and ability to deliver a quality product given the timing that this decision will ultimately be made because I'll make a recommendation to the board the board then is going to be doing more listening so it's likely that an actual decision won't happen for a bit and reduces our likelihood of being able to do implementation by fall so I'm just going to say that's part of what I'm weighing but I will make recommendations about about implementation I will also go through a process with the board who have been all out attending many of these listening sessions and as well as listening to people but I'll meet with each of them individually to hear their thoughts before i do my recommendation so that I'm really making sure to incorporate whatever they've gleaned and whatever insight because you've got a whole group of people who've been really actively out listening to voices and as you know even by what you here tonight they don't all line up in a really simple solution this is not a really easy one and we are as a community grappling with really significant growth that we've got to figure out how we how we handle and really honor what we love about our neighborhood schools so we'll also be doing individual outreach through our dual language immersion department to the 17 spanish-speaking families who are in the ainsworth program so they can speak to us individually and with in their native language so that and I will get a report that says to me here's what those families so like really specifically we'll build will be doing individual reach out to be able to hear from families so if there's other things that I need to a minute and then I put together a proposal that will come to the board in the next couple of weeks that then it's in their court they then go through additional listening and wrestling and can tweak or do do modify based on what they hear so it's we've got another couple layers to go through and I just want to say the letters that people have written me have it just since it's been in my court have been so incredibly thoughtful and with really just really trying to put forward here other ways to think about something please make sure you notice this because you may not know this but just really thoughtful trying to help move us to positive solutions and in a way that really respects everybody involved so I just want to really appreciate the voices that have come forward I have really been advocating continued transparency in our process because i feel like people have really been trying to contribute to how do we land something that really works for our community so i just want to say thank you for that and i will include the testimony in the letters in my proposal to the board so those are all visible to them as well so so thank you all great thank you girl and then find a regulation to 17 families so and again this is coming from a recommendation from my implementation team is that we've got families that as you mentioned we are not likely to come and speak necessarily in in a large community meeting but would do that we want to hear from individually and so our dual language immersion department has offered to do individual phone calls to families and then give me a report that's saying here's what we heard so and actually similar to what you just did sevens you that don't speak English is that you know for a 17 Hispanic families 17 spanish-speaking families is what i was told that that so here's what I'm gonna say to you that may be wrong that means you're wrong and I'm gathering that it is so here's what I'll say I'm relying on them to tell me who it is they're going to call so let me just leave it at that and will will seek more information to make sure we make the right phone calls but it was individual reach out
00h 45m 00s
rather than depending on who shows up at a community meeting i think is the main point there is understanding that we may not be hearing all the voices and take and during this chapter doing a personal outreach to make sure that we're hearing from people so that was really the point of it okay so okay to two meetings that i'll do one is west side and one is east side but i'm doing special invitation to communities that were directly in because i'm going to be basing my recommendations on what I got from d brac right so I'm not starting from scratch I'm taking what they gave me communities have been directly impacted in their recommendation I want to them hear more from about okay what does this mean what do you do to improve or refine like I want really direct what does this mean to you so I'm doing direct reach out and saying I need to hear from you but it's not exclusive if anybody can come from the west side to the west side or you come to either listening session or both but I really directly want to hear from communities that are impacted make sense cluster which is that one thing to think about ultimate were concerned about is if you wait wait for us the implementations district-wide is going to be immense and so we want to go we're ready to bring the work literally with you so that we can allow your fears and you guys if you put together a strategic plan yourself be sure to prove okay before be sure to provide it and and I will say my implementation team is going to do some reach out to you directly to do some listening and and it's likely that implementation of this entire thing is not going to be like a one or two-year thing this is likely be multiple years because we're talking multiple buildings we're talking not a huge big influx of money that I mean we're talking still the same resources we're working with right now and trying to make a pretty significant transition and we do not want to do some yeah we want to do this well we want to do well okay is that enough yeah that's thank you that was perfect great I just wanted to publicly thank chair curler for opening up more opportunity for public testimony tonight anything it was really important and the other thing I'll say is so Carol just talked about the process then it comes to the board everybody in on this board is totally committed to a process where everybody's hurt so we haven't finalized what this looks like but I think we're all on the same page that it's will be will be exhausted so thank you listen yeah all right thank you everybody for all your testimony all right our next topic is the board priorities on December one of 2015 the board voted honest priorities for 2 15 16 and 16 17 school years since the time that time the board has been working on metrics Rose priorities in conjunction with the superintendent and her staff we're ready to vote on those metrics tonight the board will now consider resolution 5 to 10 adopting board priority metrics for 2 15 16 16 17 school year do I have we should mention we did yeah we think we've had four open meetings on these and we've also had various committees so it's been a lot of it's actually been a lot of great work and I think it has us together with Carol and her team focused on what needs to get done do I have a motion so moved well second director Anthony moves director const am seconds to adopt resolution five to 10 miss Susan is a public comment you know is there any for discussion on this resolution and we've had we've been discussing quite a bit yeah let's see if there's any surprises on our boat I the board will now vote on resolution 5 to 10 a ver please indicate by saying yes yes yes all opposed indicate by saying no any abstentions the resolution 5 to 10 is approved by a vote of 720 with student representative Davis and voting yes yes okay well good well done
00h 50m 00s
everybody yeah we now are going to go into a conference a four-member conference report so director content you like to provide it fortunately visit ah sure i made went to New York two weeks ago at the invitation of leadership with our teachers union to visit the consortium schools which is a group of high schools in New York City that have had a waiver from the new york state Regents from their standardized testing model to do what they refer to as performance-based assessment and so we had an opportunity to talk with leaders in the school leaders of the consortium about how that has worked how they have over the years refined these very detailed rubrics for evaluating student performance we got to visit a couple of schools and see this assessment model in action which one of the pieces of that that was really compelling to me was a whole peer-review component of it so students were each each performance-based assessment team had the instructor the instructor of the class that the student was enrolled in another teacher in the school and then another student so the experience was just as as useful for the other student doing the really thoughtful review of his or her peer as it was for the student who was 19 his or her her work and it was it was really interesting and instructive and you know we will move forward in terms of refining our own best practices in terms of student assessment as a district so it was very useful good thank you any other questions for Amy okay the business consent the board will now consider the remainder of the business agenda already have voted on 5 to 10 for members or any other I'm just like to pull before we go on a you puddin you want to pull any item before we vote on the consent miss Susan are there any changes to the business of Jeff you know okay do I have a motion and a second to adopt the business agenda so moved second director Anthony moves and dr. spars of Browns seconds to adoption of the business agendas who's in there any public comment there is not okay the board will now vote on the agenda all in favor please by indicate by saying yes yes yes all posing to give us a no any abstentions the business agenda is proved by a vote of 720 with student representing Davis and voting YES Odin yes okay the next meeting of the board will be held tuesday februari


Sources