2015-02-03 PPS School Board Study Session
District | Portland Public Schools |
---|---|
Date | 2015-02-03 |
Time | missing |
Venue | missing |
Meeting Type | study |
Directors Present | missing |
Documents / Media
Notices/Agendas
Materials
02-03-15 Final Packet (a7ce6b60c7269f95).pdf Meeting Materials
PPTs for Web (06fc111f8c3b4e6a).pdf PowerPoint Presentations
02-03-15 Meeting Overview (2eb869cbe1239978).pdf Meeting Overview
Minutes
Transcripts
Event 1: Board of Education - Study Session - February 3, 2015
00h 00m 00s
good evening this study session of the
board of education for february 3rd 2015
is called to order i'd like to extend a
warm welcome to everyone present and to
our television viewers
well our study sessions are generally
limited to receipt of information from
staff and discussion of that information
review of resolutions prior to vote at
times we do conduct votes during study
sessions
any item that will be voted on this
evening has been posted as required by
state law this meeting is being
televised live and will be replayed
throughout the next two weeks please
check the board website for replay times
this meeting is also being streamed live
on our pps tv services website
um directors regan and curler are absent
this evening director regan is with a
delegation in washington dc with the
oregon school boards association
lobbying for improved federal funding
and policy so go bobby and oregon school
boards association
all right
so
um this time they will kick off with
public comment miss houston do we have
any anyone signed up we do we have a
total of five great and our first two
speakers are fair hutchins
and jennifer starkey okay so while those
folks are coming forward i'll just read
the instructions thank you so much for
taking the time to attend the meeting
tonight and provide your comments to the
board
we value your input and we look forward
to hearing your thoughts reflections and
concerns we're going to actively listen
and reflect in your comments but we're
not going to respond or
to comments or questions during public
comment we have asked board board
manager roseanne powell to follow up on
issues that are raised so she's
available there after if you have
questions afterward about how the board
or staff might respond guidelines for
public input emphasize respect and
consideration for others complaints
about individual employees should be
directed to the superintendent's office
uso you have a total of three minutes to
share your comments please begin by
stating your name and spelling your last
name for the record during the first two
minutes there'll be a green light when
you have one minute remaining the yellow
light will come on and then when the
time is up a red light comes on and we
respectfully ask that you wrap up at
that time so thanks again for taking the
time to be here and you may begin
thanks
hi my name is feyer hutchins
h-u-t-c-h-i-n-s
and uh good evening appreciate the
opportunity to share and join this
conversation about our children in our
schools
uh i am a concerned community member i
used to be a social worker with pps
and i worked for a program called the
attendance initiative
which was a culturally specific program
with sei erco and impact northwest
slavic
it's been a couple of years since i've
worked with the school systems as all
discouraged after working with that
program
but i am coming back as a volunteer in
the spanish immersion program at beach
so i'm really excited to come back
so the program i worked for was quickly
defunded after about two years
even though it did directly address
attendance which is one of pps's equity
research
outlined as a central indicator for
success
lou frederick last week or a couple
weeks ago
he was speaking at the equity town hall
at boise and he shared that racial
equity issues have not changed much
since the 80s and uh that the issues are
actually well understood but the
solutions are not being funded so i
agree with him i think he's correct
and we do know what the problems are and
we know that pps's
respectable commitment to research
has definitely defined what the
solutions are but we're not funding them
or in my case we fund a solution
temporarily but not long enough for it
to have an impact
so i would like to share tonight two
ways that i see that institutional
racism is active in these failures
i share not as an attack but as a cry
for dialogue
firstly the inconsistency of committed
resources to equity is to blame for the
failure of these programs
the defunding of a solution-based
program like mine before it could get
its feet under it is actually a form of
racism please hear me out i know that
funding is a very complicated issue
but programs that serve communities of
color they stay in this experimental
phase and then their funding comes and
goes and usually the programs that serve
communities of color will be given up
before they actually have that chance to
thrive
the same way that black families at my
schools were falling through the cracks
when i was working
two of my favorite students were a black
kindergartner and first grader
it's really sad
and the principal told me not to work
with them
that i should give up
and that was really frustrating
but i didn't give up
kept doing that but what i did see is
that the school really
uh you know
let me see if i can get back on track
here a little emotional the evidence of
the school-to-prison pipeline in this
and just how we don't fund things that
actually work is part of that racism
trying to watch my yellow light and then
00h 05m 00s
secondly along with the inconsistent
resources for equity we have failed
outcomes because black and brown people
are not invited and pursued to be at the
table to develop and fund programs that
they need
so
i would just really like to encourage
all of you to ask for direct community
involvement in the budget process here
and really get people at the table
because people know what they need
the black community knows what they need
and we need to be able to ask them and
actually get there engage them thank you
thank you very much
go ahead
hi
my name is jennifer starkey
s-t-a-r-k-e-y
um i'm here at the bequest of a parent
at the school i teach at after school
i was a staff member at mesd outdoor
school for four years between 2007 and
2011 and
during that time
the program went through a huge
shrinkage it was
all the budgets in the region
well they they just lost their funding
and um
so it went all the districts either
had to cut their time in half or just
eliminate it completely um
i wrote some things down
we were faced with the task of making a
three-day program as effective and
meaningful as possible
something outdoor school excels at is
structure it is a finely tuned 45
plus your structure that is highly
intentional in every detail
and what happens to sixth graders in
that structure
is that they have a predictable schedule
a place to sleep meals to eat and people
around them
and predictability
allows students to relax and learn more
outdoor school also pushes so many
students out of their comfort zones and
pushes them to grow
the combination of exposure to new
people a new place new routines new ways
of learning and even being away from
home and being in the outdoors is a big
opportunity for growth for so many
students
the structure and new experiences are
beneficial for students at any length so
i don't want to diminish this three-day
program in any way
however isn't it isn't just a math issue
when it comes to the benefits of
increased time at outdoor school uh
three days to 60 days is not just twice
as much field study or twice as many
meals or twice as many campfires
it is an exponential result
sixth grade is something i've noticed
it's this magic time where identity
really starts to take hold and
i've watched countless students do
things on friday that they
never would have done on sunday when
they got off the bus
homesick kids don't want to leave the
kid that fails in the classroom is
outstanding on field study and finds out
that they're smart
and the kid who can't make friends at
school
makes a ton of friends from other
schools and
today
so i work now uh you may be familiar
with the kaiser on interstate by
overlook park um i work i make coffee
there i've done it for over a year and
um today i was i was talking to some
regulars and i was like hillary
hilary did you go to outdoor school and
she was like
yeah
yeah it was the best week of my life
and i said why
she said oh
i had no friends before i went to
outdoor school and then i went and i met
all these people and then i was like wow
i can make friends this one was like the
friendliest person in the whole place so
anyway go figure um anyway thanks for
your time thank you very much
our next two speakers
rick till and maria da silva
i get to hold my sign for three minutes
more
sure atkins board members uh i'm rick
till i'm on the board for east multnomah
swollen water conservation district if
you're not familiar with east multnomah
we're a special district with a elected
publicly elected board of directors that
has a small tax space to spend money on
helping people care for their
land and water
in addition to that for the last three
years we've been providing support for
outdoor school three years ago it was on
an emergency basis to keep the current
program from being completely cut since
then we've been
providing uh funding just to keep the
program maintained as the community
works to restore it to a full week
we've also paid for a planning program
00h 10m 00s
through the intertwined alliance to
develop a strategy for restoring the
program for a full week
even with that work it's a long shot to
get that done
in the near future you guys have an
opportunity to
to possibly do that this year
that would make a huge difference for me
i don't know
it's been a struggle to get the money
out of the east multnomah each year not
everybody's in agreement that we should
be contributing the amount we are
makes my case substantially easier if
i'm using that money to leverage a full
week versus just the three days and that
would make a huge difference that that
would give me that the basis to even try
and get that same level of funding for
another two or three years until some of
the bigger strategies can come in and
help
make that a perpetual program
also
in addition to helping me
get more money to the program i think
providing that stability would also
afford us
as
any more money comes available to the
east multnomah to explore ways to
enhance the program provide more
opportunities for student leaders i'd
like to see more student leaders placed
in
internship positions throughout the city
and with natural resource groups and
non-profits to learn more and cultivate
the next generation of
conservation leaders we can't it's hard
to explore those additional
opportunities if we're just barely
keeping our our heads above water the
existing program so i encourage you to
restore the full program uh for the next
year thank you very much thank you thank
you so much for your support of outdoor
school we really appreciate it thanks
for being here yes
hi thank you this is it feels very good
the energy today is the first time um
this beautiful lady karen hudson let me
sign up without asking me to arrange it
ahead of time so
let me introduce you this is maya she
goes to regular elementary school first
grade and meshi is a special needs child
he's going to be going to pps
public schools uh hopefully you know um
he'll have a good opportunity um
i know board of director i went off the
board of directors of the regular pta as
you know me and i've been coming here to
a lot of your meetings too you know to
ask you to demand to ask you to listen
lately i've been coming with don't shoot
to protest and to shut down your
meetings because i don't know what else
to do
my kids are here and you are responsible
for their success as well as i am i've
done everything as a parent
to providing as much opportunity equal
access and equal opportunity for them to
succeed now you have to do your job and
you have to do your share it's very sad
for me today i met with our principal
sara garandia and with the pta for a
recap leadership meeting
and her goals
everywhere
unrealistic
she has a lot of hope and a lot of good
positive energy to meet our goals
30 to 45 percent of our students in
third fourth fifth grade
are failing you know actually it's more
than that only 35 to 45 percent you know
are underachieved they are not getting
to benchmark
and
one of her goals was to bring 50 of our
minority kids
to reading level and benchmark which
means half of the latina women that were
there in the meeting will get their kids
to a benchmark
by the end of the year but half of us we
won't and that's very sad
i guess the other thing is that you did
gave us a little bit more for two eas
let me tell you we had five years we
didn't have that many it helped that we
protested
out of those five years four quit
they're gone because you didn't help us
to fund those student management black
community liaison and result justice
person in part i'm not going to say that
that's the reason why they fall but in
part they knew what was coming without
them at regular elementary school so
they are gone and we have
two new ueas we're gonna have couple
more who have no idea of how to do their
job and hopefully you will bring us help
my job is i am an ea and my job is to
bring kids to benchmark who are really
low to benchmark in two months in one
month but with effective you know
teachers who are supported and listened
by their board of directors to finish
i just want to tell you that
it just breaks my heart because
every time i come with my kids they see
me crying and i shouldn't be going
through these but you cannot expect us
to do to bring the kids to benchmark
if you are not funding us
a librarian at least a full-time nurse
another teacher another reading
specialist we have the same budget than
last year except that we have two new
eas and those two new eas you know that
are working with kindergartners they're
not gonna be working with third fourth
fifth graders to bring them to benchmark
thank you thank you very much
00h 15m 00s
our last speaker is james lopez erickson
welcome
hello hello
um
i just wanted to first share a quote
excuse me could you share your name and
spell your last name for the record
thanks
my name is james lopez erickson my last
name is spelled erickson is
e-r-i-c-k-s-e-n
i first wanted to share a quote someone
shared with me today
she's african-american
a mother whose children go in are at the
school district and the reason i wanted
to share this quote is because i
acknowledge how many
parents of color
don't or can't make it to medians like
tonight
and she said that
the system isn't broken because it's
working exactly how it's supposed to for
who it's supposed to work for
it isn't for us people of color we got
to create our own
and something my wife shared who's
latina said
first people of color aren't invited
then we're blamed for not participating
so don't blame me when i decide to do
things my own way
and so
i acknowledge every family of color who
doesn't make it to menis like tonight
and who
do not make up the administration of the
portland public schools
the first thing i would like to ask for
is an immediate proposal and a vote for
a change to the three-minute testimony
when a non-english speaking person
testifies
i ask that the policy states the timer
stops during translation and then
continues again when the person
continues their testimony
the second thing i would like to do
is again acknowledge every
parent and student of color who is not
here tonight i've been to so many
rallies around immigration
around
injustices in regards to racism
and
so many families of color don't come
and the thing that my wife says to me at
the end of the day is i can't and she'll
say that even if the security of our
children are at stake
because the stressors of her life get to
be to a point where she becomes
literally debilitated
where her
physical ability to do things anymore
just comes to an end
and so i'm here tonight as a white
person
advocating for my wife and every family
of color
who has not been able to
participate in the very system that it
wasn't set up to work for
um
and so there are two stories i like to
share one was and these were both right
after ferguson at a school where
family and african-american
family attends their son is black
he was asked to step outside of the
classroom and while he was asked to step
outside of the classroom the teacher was
trying to do
i don't know what she was trying to do a
cultural awareness training or something
with her students for an elementary age
explaining to them that her
the black kids in her class might be
extremely upset
because of the verdict that happened in
ferguson
and i think this was a very
inappropriate example of how a teacher
tried to implement something in regards
to racial equity the second example was
a black student who is in elementary age
was asked to stand in the middle of the
classroom
the teacher then proceeded to ask the
students in the classroom what's
different about this child
well at that age you're getting
responses like their shoelaces the color
of their coat those types of things
until the teacher insisted that the
students acknowledge that the kids skin
color is what's different about them
both of these examples
show the lack of
experience and training need for a
cultural competency within our teachers
thank you very much you might want to
check with our board manager too because
i think she can clarify one of about one
of your points that we're already okay
as part of our policy thank you very
much to everyone who testified tonight
so
so our contract with the portland
federation of school professionals
allows time on the board agenda for
comments so i'd like to welcome belinda
reagan president of pfsp to come on down
and provide some comments at this time
welcome
good evening
i'm belinda regan i'm the president of
pfsp the portland federation of school
professionals before i begin my
pre-written dialogue i do want to stand
in support of our mother from wrigler um
and her comments
about the ea the need for eas in
the third and fourth grade levels to to
maintain
00h 20m 00s
the progress that we hope to
achieve
in reading
really very essential
so good evening to all of you um several
weeks ago i received the district's
budget prioritizing exercise which i
promptly sat down and attended to
and in doing so i realized with
certainty that i really would not wish
these decision-making duties on anyone
even you folks
had i the ability and the point
allowances i would have fully touched
each one
of the proposed budget items
but i didn't
as background to my plea this evening to
you as school board members i hope that
you'll indulge me for a few moments as i
explain the reasoning behind my support
of one budget focus option in particular
i am a child of portland having attended
the first kindergarten class ever
enrolled at joseph meek elementary in
the mid 50s
in 1959 i left meek when my family moved
across town and i became a became a part
of a small school district called the
sylvan school district
which soon merged into portland public
schools providing two new west side
schools little sylvan and west sylvan
wes sylvan of course became a feeder for
lincoln high school which was my alma
mater
as i grew up in portland schools i spent
my fair share of time in the school
office
i'm certain an explanation of the why
isn't necessary for those of you who
know me well
as an office regular i grew to adore the
i grew to adore the secretaries with
whom i visited regularly women whose
warmth and compassion was felt by all
students parents and staff they were
always busy but never too much so to
take a few minutes to chat and act truly
interested in my probably boring life
never do i recall there being a just one
secretary in my school there were always
two or three answering phones attending
to student and family needs working with
the principal and so much more that i
simply wasn't aware of
today in portland our schools serve an
incredibly different student and family
population than it was there there was
present in the days that i attended
school as portland has grown we've
welcomed a wonderfully diverse community
enriching our student bodies with
special needs kids children from other
cultures and from varying socio economic
backgrounds we've also experienced a
tremendous change in how we manage our
schools as classroom sizes have
increased technology has burst forth
into our lives and students face new
challenges each year both in
educationally and socially throughout
all of these enormous changes the school
office continues to remain the hub of
every building in this district
in the past 25 years since measure 5 was
foolishly passed we've been forced to
stand by and watch the demands and
responsibilities of the office staff
increased 20-fold while our secretarial
numbers continue to shrink in an effort
to maintain a balanced budget
the school that once housed three
secretaries serving in different
capacities now has an office managed by
just one person stretched to their limit
and yet the duties continue to pile on
these hard-working dedicated employees
seldom do secretaries take breaks too
often when i walk into a school office i
see the sole secretary eating a sandwich
at their desk as they type answer phones
and tend to sick children
more often than the district will
acknowledge secretaries work beyond
their eight-hour shift without pay
simply in order to finish their tasks
only to return the next day to feel
overwhelmed all over again
happily for the first time in years some
schools receive part-time funding for
additional clerical workers this year
while this added fte helped tremendously
in many cases it affected far too few of
our schools
excuse me and our secretaries continue
to be overworked overloaded and
overwhelmed with their everyday jobs
add to that the constant changes to
district software programs practices and
policies and the transference of duties
once handled by district-based
departments the women and men who are
truly the backbone of every school can
hardly function any longer we are losing
increasing numbers of secretaries each
year as they reach their highest level
of tolerance to the ever mounting duties
assigned to them
my message to you tonight is this
a happy school requires a happy
secretary one who is able to complete
their assignments while answering those
phones and attending to those sick
children
dealing with angry parents and sometimes
00h 25m 00s
demanding staff
all within the eight-hour day that
they're actually paid for
i do not believe that this goal can be
achieved without the addition of at
least one full-time secretary to every
school in this district
as you ponder how best to fund our
educational processes in the years ahead
please keep this in mind
portland public schools simply cannot
provide an excellent education to every
child in portland without the warmth and
compassion that i experienced as a child
from the secretaries who keep these
systems fine-tuned
while i am certain that warmth and
compassion remain a priority for all of
our wonderful school office workers i'm
left wondering how they can continue to
face each new day with a smile for the
students the parents and the staff when
they are so incredibly beleaguered by
their ever increasing workloads please
consider an increase of clerical workers
to our schools as you make your
difficult budget decisions
thank you very much ms regan thank you
for being here thank you for letting me
have a moment thank you thank you
all right so now uh student
representative jeff well they have a
report to share with
us
first of all i'd like to start there
congratulating all the teams to
participate in last month's we the
people competitions
having been part of this program i know
the tremendous work that goes into
preparation and immense knowledge to
gain i'd like to recognize madison high
school which this was their first year
having a constitution team who won a
unit award at the district uh
competition which means that they had
the highest score for a single unit of
all the teams there which is just really
awesome
considering it's their first year and
i'm excited to see where they go and
then i very high hope
i have very high hopes for grant who's
continuing to national competition in
late april
secondly
secondly i like to highlight the
importance of having learning
opportunities outside the classroom
a couple weeks ago i had the opportunity
with my ib biology class to go watch a
body get dissected
and getting to see the human anatomy
inches away from where i stood was just
an expansion of what i've learned in the
classroom so from that as i move forward
in the budgeting season i think i'm so
important that students do have access
to these opportunities
and career-related learning
opportunities as a lot of students my
class took this as an opportunity to
explore healthcare fields
so members of supersac are looking
forward to volunteering at glencoe
elementary school next friday
where they'll be helping out with a
valentine's day party
this month super sac students will also
be heading to salem to lobby for a
budget that supports academic
achievement and for a full week of
outdoor school
lastly supersac also looks forward to
providing input into the high school
schedules for next year so if you all
have time i encourage you to go to
promise of oregon's website and look at
the web or video that was published
today about roosevelt high school junior
tory eagle staff it really just
highlights the importance of
transformative education and the reason
that we need to keep pushing for a
budget that really supports our students
thank you all
thank you so much mina so before we have
three um very important and meaty topics
tonight so just a word to my colleagues
beforehand knowing that our presenters
staff have i have long presentations for
us with a lot of information if you
could just hold you know make a note of
your comments and questions and hold
those till the end if at all possible so
that we can make sure they can get
through their presentation and then
we'll have a full discussion so just if
you can just make notes as you go we
would really appreciate that and with
that we'll get started on the first
major topic which is the 2015-16
budget informational update on high
school graduation rates and high school
action teams update so superintendent
smith would you like to introduce this
item um i would and i'll ask antonio
lopez who is assistant superintendent
for school performance to come on up and
lead this presentation we'll also have
jay james who's the senior director of
college and career readiness sarah
singer senior director of system
planning and performance and jocelyn
begaye salter director of our early
warning systems
who will bring us up to date on our
graduation rates and early warning
system
thank you roseanne
oh yeah
good evening co-chairs atkins and
knowles
00h 30m 00s
directors student representatives
superintendent
my name is antonio lopez i'm the
assistant superintendent for the office
of school performance
and the presentation that you're gonna
hear today
we're gonna touch on several topics
and with your permission what uh what i
would like to do is to go over the
presentation and then at the end we will
open and will entertain any of your
questions so
um we're gonna have sarah singer senior
director of system planning and
performance who's going to go over the
our graduation and completion data
and we're going to have shea james
senior director of college and career
readiness along with joseline
director of early warning systems and
they will update progress on early
warning systems
defining what an early warning system is
and the next steps in developing an
implementation on the early warning
systems
and then at the end i will give you our
overall
presentation of the other systems that
we work in in terms of aligning our high
school
great so hi my name is sarah singer
senior director of system planning and
performance
and i am going to present to you the
data on completion and graduation rates
before i do that i just want to make
sure that we're all
kind of consistent in our definitions
and our understanding
so
this year the state
made
a change on who counts as graduates so
one
change is that modified diplomas are now
now count as part of the four-year
cohort graduation rate in the past those
students would have been in our
completer rate which i'll get to in a
minute
just to be clear to be eligible for
modified diplomas a student has to have
a documented history of an inability to
maintain grade level achievement
due to significant learning and
instructional barriers or a documented
history of a medical condition
that creates a barrier to achievement
so
students just to recap students who have
modified diplomas are now part of
what counts as a graduate
we're also going to talk we hear a lot
about the four-year cohort graduation
rate um tonight we're also going to hear
about the completion rate so i just want
to make sure people are aware of what
the difference is between those two so
included in completer in the completed
rate are students
who
have graduated who have earned a ged
or have earned what we call an extended
or adult high school diploma
it should also be noted that in 2014 the
ged was revamped to be more rigorous and
to align with the common core state
standards
other changes
to note are included as graduates are
students who met the requirements to
graduate
but decided to stay a fifth year
in school so this is not going to be
particularly pertinent to portland
public schools because we don't have
students in this category but other
other districts around the state have
exercised this option those students
typically go on to higher education for
a year um
while they're
while they're
well they're still technically in the um
paid for by kind of the district funds
okay so to get to the data um what we
have here is
um our four-year cohort graduation rate
over time
and um starting with our 2008 9 number
which was really the first year that we
collected cohort graduation rates and we
were at 53 percent that year
and we are what we reported to the state
this year was 70
graduation rate
that particular figure includes the
modified diplomas if you were to exclude
the modified diploma so that you have
more of an apples to apples comparison
our graduation rate would have been 69
so it impacted us by a percent those
changes
so overall that's a
16 to 17 percent grad rate depending on
how you want to calculate it
and so if we look at four-year
completion and five-year completion
rates which you're going to also see in
comparison to graduation rates you're
going to see that over time our
four-year completion rate has um
trended upwards slightly over the last
several years
and you're also going to see that our
five-year completion rate has trended
upwards so basically we can say with
confidence that our four-year graduation
our four-year completion and our
00h 35m 00s
five-year completion rate have been
moving in the right direction we have
been making improvements over time
in comparison to the state of oregon and
other schools
the oregon graduation rate is 72 percent
in 2009 they were at 66.
and pps in 2009 we were at 54 and then
we've made
a lot of growth over time and we are now
at 70. so we are two percentage points
behind the state but we are growing more
rapidly
our completion rate in comparison to
oregon is um
we're both at 80 82 percent
and we have also shown significant
growth in comparison to the state on
completion rate
when we break out the four-year cohort
by race and ethnicity over the last
several years here's what you'll find so
our american indian and alaskan native
graduation rate is at 47 percent this is
the lowest of our racial and ethnic
groups um this year
our asian
students are at 82 percent and you see
steady growth
since 2010-11.
our black students
are
at 60 this year so this is
we what we experienced with our black
graduation rate for about three years
was stagnation so it was at 55 in 2010
in 11 and 12 we were around 53 percent
so we were just kind of it's stagnant so
this year we jumped to 60 percent so
that is um
a bigger jump for that for that group
our hispanic graduation rate is at 56
percent so while we've shown growth over
time over a four year period for
hispanic for the hispanic rate it is
it unfortunately dropped a percentage
point in comparison to last
year our pacific islander
population
we had a significant increase in
their graduation rate and then
our white
population we've seen steady growth over
time
so if we um
we think it's important to look at the
the data disaggregated by both
gender and race so that's what this
picture will show so our asian females
have an 88
graduation rate
um and so what you'll see is data
um
by gender and race
so white male is 71
um african-american female is 65 percent
hispanic latino female is 63
native hawaiian pacific islander male 1
63
multi-racial male 62
um
black african-american males 55 so
you'll you'll see a gap between black
african-american females and black
african-american males of 10 percentage
points because
55 for american indian alaska native
females
51 for hispanic latino males and then
finally 38
for american indian alaska native males
four-year cohort graduation rates by
school so we used growth since 2009-10
so what you'll see is since that point
in time
all of our comprehensive and or focus
options schools have experienced growth
madison
has grown 20 percentage points over that
period of time
franklin is another
success story
at 14 percentage points um
so you'll see just that and the total is
for the comprehensives right now our
comprehensive and focus option grad rate
is at 82 percent and that's a 12
increase 12 percentage point increase
since 2009 10.
other notable highlights mlc increased
their graduation rate by 23 percentage
points from the previous year
summer scholars which is a summer school
located at benson graduated 37 students
this past summer and that we know
increased our graduation rate by one
percentage point
the black white achievement gap closed
at jefferson franklin and roosevelt
00h 40m 00s
specifically i think franklin had a 91
graduation rate for its african-american
students
and the black white achievement gap
nearly closed at benson and madison
within two percentage points
um
roosevelt high school's graduation rate
um fell
11 11 points and it should say 253
percent not from 53
the rate still is up 11 points over over
the from the past five years
um interesting um
thing about roosevelt is that they have
a um much higher five-year
graduation rate or five yeah five-year
graduation rate so a lot of their
students don't necessarily make it in
four years
but
they
they do go on to enroll in a fifth year
and so that's sort of um just something
to note here so when i look at other
when we compare the four-year grad rate
and the five-year grad rate and remember
these are different sets of kids because
they're different cohorts so just keep
that in mind but what you do see is for
roosevelt in particular a pretty large
difference that fifth year really makes
a difference for roosevelt it makes a
pretty big difference for jefferson and
alliance as well this is just something
we've seen a lot with our schools that
serve that have higher poverty
concentrations or serve more
historically underserved students we
tend to see that that fifth year really
makes a big difference
we see it in our alternative system as
well
our cbo's
other notable
graduation rates for our economically
disadvantaged our graduation rate was 61
percent that's up six percentage points
um from the past four years
our limited english proficiency or we
like to call our emerging bilingual
population it has a graduation rate of
49 percent
that is up 11 percentage points um from
from four years from 2009 10. special
education at 50 percent and there that's
up 18 percentage points this modified
diploma um being included is especially
going to impact the special education
graduation rate
um
tag is a 91 graduation rate and then we
see if our female at 75 percent and our
male is at 66 percentage points so we do
see a gender gap in our graduation rate
and then
one other
important point to note is that for
those students who join
pps in the ninth grade cohort they have
a 77 percent graduation rate
we we get students who join us in 10th
grade 11th grade and 12th grade
and they're um
we might call late entrance and their
graduation rate is significantly lower
as you can see 48 41 and 34
respectively we also have a group of
students who've actually never enrolled
at pps that are still part of our cohort
and those students live in pps
boundaries um but they go to for example
an mesd run school like helens view so
there's not a lot of them but they are
there is
you know
they do count in our cohort so when you
add up all the students who um joined in
10th grade or sort of after or never
enrolled that's about that was 18 of our
cohort this year last year it was it was
about the same it was about 20 so this
is kind of a consistent figure for us
and so um with that
i am going to hand it over to shay james
senior director of our office of a
college and career readiness and she's
going to talk about
one of our critical strategies on how
we're addressing graduation and
completion rates
thank you
good evening board of directors and
superintendent smith
as assistant superintendent lopez
mentioned tonight we are providing you
an update of where we are on the
implementation of our early warning
system
we want to highlight the prior work
which functioned as a catalyst for
moving towards implementing systemic
approach
let me actually turn that on
thank you
which functioned as as a
let me start over which functioned as a
catalyst for moving towards implementing
a systemic approach
focusing on intervening early and often
using personalization strategies and
emphasizes a continuum of services for
six through twelve
the early warning system is
incorporating successful strategies from
our high school graduation project the
high school graduation initiative
project
is a five-year federal grant awarded in
2010 providing 11 schools with outreach
coordinators as well as additional
supports for partners such as campfire
step up
and additional alternative school slots
the grants the grants sunset september
2015
however we are dedicated to
00h 45m 00s
systematically adopting some of its most
promising practices
through the work of the high school
action team which involved year-long
work teams that included teachers
parents students principals central
office administrators community and
board members an early warning system
was defined as one that works to retain
students in their local school to
decrease the need for alternative
options for youth who are younger and on
track without compromising services to
all students across the continuum
the continuum we are referring to
provides supports to all youth through
prevention
intervention and re-engagement
a point to note in this definition is
that we are also addressing the
recommendations put forth from the
segmentation analysis you have all
previously received which builds
capacity in our schools so that we are
not just decreasing the need for all
options for younger students but working
towards serving students at their home
school
an external evaluation was conducted to
evaluate the impact of the hsgi project
one key finding that we have not been
able to measure in the past is students
who participate in after school
programming such as camp fire step up or
sun schools begin to make academic
improvements after receiving 750 hours
of service
joseline beguy salter who has led the
hsgi work under multiple pathways to
graduation is going to highlight some of
the other areas where hsgi has made an
impact on accelerating graduation rates
while this finding is exciting
we do want to note that this is a very
intensive model with 750 hours equally
equaling 94 days of participation for
each student
good evening board of directors and
superintendent smith as i highlight some
of the areas of impact i want to mention
the success of the hsgi project was not
possible without without
cross-department collaboration building
level engagement and a collective
teaming approach from all
tonight we are highlighting a few of our
high-profile strategies that
significantly impacted graduation
efforts
hsgi had significant impact beginning
with the
staffing team strategy
we worked very closely with building
personnel to establish staffing teams
that parallel student intervention or
care teams
staffing teams included
key building personnel such as
counselors administrators partners like
sun or and step up
campfire attendance coordinators and
outreach coordinators
these teams met weekly record and
coordinate intervention efforts for
students by name
another area of impact was examining and
refining the academic priority list
for accuracy
it is a tool we use to bring students at
risk to the surface
students are identified using the
following indicators attendance grades
and at the time the oak scores
we improve the report in collaboration
with research and evaluation as well as
by using the mary beth cilio
of portland public schools cohort study
done a few years back
this is one of the initial efforts to
identify students earlier and in a more
useful way
assisting rising 9th graders in their
transition into high school as sarah
pointed out is a huge piece of the work
as well
this is another area where hsgi has been
able to
been of effective
through these efforts we have warmly
handed off
656 students to high school staff
partners and other outreach coordinators
recent credit recovery efforts are yet
another area of hsgi impact for students
by name
in our first full year of service hsgi
served
seniors who were close to graduating but
it needed additional supports
we impacted 21 of those 331 students and
helped them to graduate
the subsequent year due to more
intentional collaboration we served 321
seniors that were close to graduation
and 88 percent were able to graduate the
majority of which were students of color
based on this success as a district we
are now investing more intentionally in
providing school site credit recovery
options
this past june for example we were able
to provide credit recovery options at
every one of our high schools
00h 50m 00s
as well as do away with any financial
barriers seniors might have had that
would keep them from graduating by
providing summer scholars tuition or
tuition reimbursement
the efforts at fourth in june assisted
an additional 42 seniors in graduating
doubling our summer graduation rate
so shane mentioned she referred to a
continuum
when we talk about a continuum of
services
this is essentially what we're talking
about services that really address all
subsets of the population
in order to meet the goal of building a
systemic school level approach we must
function within a continuum where all
subsets of the population grade 6
through 12 have access to supports and
are provided
excuse me an entry point for either
staying on track
a focus on the prevention side of the
spectrum or getting back on track
this calls for building an
infrastructure in our schools that
allows families and students to access
support services such as sun school or
step up
or instructional opportunities like
credit recovery cte advanced scholars
or reconnection center services
it also provides teachers counselors and
administrators with a menu of support
services to better serve all of our
students
using the criteria from the high school
action
team developed this is what a continuum
of services would begin to look like
it is an early warning system comprised
of tangible engagement opportunities
such as credit recovery learning and
credit options cte middle school youth
supports participation in partner
programming and effective student
progress communication to families
it also has more functioning elements
such as school intervention and early
warning system advisory teams as well as
a system level early warning monitoring
and reporting tools
to provide you
with
examples of the work we will highlight
one of the new progress reporting tools
that families will receive
so the notice of progress to our
graduation report will be mailed out to
families twice a year
it will provide families with a more
reader-friendly student's progress
toward graduation report
if you if you you'll see here where
families will now
receive this letter and it will clearly
indicate whether their student is off
track or on track
it provides them with a list of subjects
shows the required credits for
graduation
the credits earned by the students and
their essential skills and personalized
learning progress
sarah single will now speak a little bit
about the new dashboard monitoring tool
thanks jocelyne
so we have something that's called the
data dashboard
it provides real-time data to
administrators and counselors and select
other school-based staff
so
one of
the pieces of work that my department
has done in collaboration with the
office of college and career readiness
i.t and some school-based staff is to
improve this dashboard tool and
specifically to align it around the
superintendent's three priorities one of
which is to accelerate the graduation
and completion rate so
one of the products from this
effort is a new dash report report that
tracks this is just an example we've
actually created a couple of these
reports but this one attracts attendance
and tardies by period for every student
so in the past and this is really going
to be more relevant for sixth grade and
up
but this before we didn't have the
ability to actually say is a student
missing one period
more than another and so now we have a
real-time data source
for administrators counselors and other
select school staff to do that we also
have a report
for school-based personnel
administrators um that tells whether or
not students are actually on track to
graduate based on credits and their
essential skills again that was not
something we had in the past some of the
latest budget investments have allowed
enabled us to be able to produce this
type of thing in order to create the
report
what we did is we had
what we called a data action team so in
that team was some school-based
personnel
i.t
people from office of school office of
college and career readiness
and we designed the report and then we
went out and did several focus groups
one with counselors to say hey does this
work for you what doesn't work for you
00h 55m 00s
and we also did another focus group
with administrators to do the same sort
of thing and so that's how this design
process has worked
so you heard our student represented
representative mentioned cte tonight and
as we work towards building the early
warning system we are intentionally
examining all potential engagement and
re-engagement opportunities
district-wide especially for our males
cte has surfaced as an example and an
opportunity of this
according to the national research
center of career and technical education
earning three or more cte credits within
a focused pathway was second only to
ninth grade students grade point average
as the strongest viable affecting
the strongest variable affecting high
school survival for boys
as you can see
there there is a lot of good work that
is going on
and uh we're very excited about the
gains on high school graduation but we
know that we still have a lot of work to
do
so uh part of the work is how do we
build this continuum
how do we build a strong elementary
schools
how do we make sure that our kids are
reading by third grade
and how do we make sure that at the
middle schools we engage our students
because if they're not successful in
third grade we're going to start seeing
in middle grades where they start
disengaging from the system and that
contributes to the
to uh
drop out or
students not
been successful in high school
so you heard about the early response
system i want to just give you a brief
presentation about the other systems
that we're working
we're putting a lot of emphasis in the
middle school like i say because that is
an area where we need to make sure that
those kids that are disengaged how do we
engage them
so we're exploring
outdoor school to make it a week long
the way it was
because we know that these are the
events in the students lives that it's a
hook and it's something that they're
looking forward
we also looking at the seventh grade
level how do we get students to
experiential learning
looking at maker space
in other areas in which they get to show
their talents
in which they also
engage our teachers and how
they can work with students in
different modalities and where students
can show again what they're capable
like you know they can do projects in 3d
printers and things like that
the other one that is also very
important is how do we expose our kids
to
college
because we know that this is an area
that the early we do it the better
and
part of that
also
so in eighth grade we will have college
visits
uh
we also want to work with our
students and our families
and uh
director bill
send me an email
because we have a lot of students in
oracle that are not taking
that are not applying for some of the
money that is available for college so
how do we make sure that our pps
students are applying for those so how
do we engage the families
and how do we get the students because
knowing how to access those grants it's
important
and
in terms of the city
how do we create this continuum of
awareness
exploration and preparation the
awareness that in the sixth seventh and
eighth graders we want students to find
out
what they're interested
what field are they're interested on and
this is an area that you know when you
ask our middle school students what are
you interested they might not be able to
tell you so how do we expose them to
what is out there
the different fields
that is the awareness aspect the
exploration aspect is
what a student goes deeper and we expose
that we take them to the different
companies that are that are
here
like caterpillar or daimler or
01h 00m 00s
to the hospital so they can explore it
in terms of their
their interest
and the preparation is where students
they gonna be able to
have a
program study
this is where they're really committed
this is what i want to do
this is where students can do job
shadowing
they can do internships
this is where students can take dual
credit classes
this is where students can
learn an apprenticeship or they can
earn a credential
that will help them later on whatever
choice they decide if a
career
the other one that where
we know it is important is to develop
our athletics at the middle grades
because that's another system
that
that makes a difference for our kids
so as you can see these are the
different
systems that we're trying to build and
how do we create this continuum so our
goal is a hundred percent of our kids to
be successful for
post-secondary education
lastly
these are the areas that we're working
currently working on
in terms of increased graduation rates
you heard about the earlier ordering
system
also how do we develop better data
systems
and you heard about
how
how we're gonna
let
parents know if the student is on track
to graduation how do we engage the
families early on
and also how do we improve attendance
and lastly alternative learning
opportunities that can include creative
recovery saturday school virtual
scholars all those opportunities for the
kids will have to make up for in areas
that they're struggling
in terms of college and career
preparation
this year
we're planning to have a three to five
year strategic plan
and actually we're working with some of
you to help us develop that plan
how do we expand how do we expand
accelerated and dual credit
opportunities
how to build on the existing career
related learning cte plans and how do we
standardize yearly guidance and
curriculum plans
and lastly
in terms of aligning existing high
school systems work
we were able to create the office of
college
and career readiness
and they're looking at college and
career readiness strategic role map dual
credit credit recovery
career learning and we're working with
bonnie hopson in how do we increase our
avid schools and europe
so that's the end of our presentation
and we'll be more than happy to
entertain any of your questions on high
school or early learning systems or just
that overall continue great thank you so
much and thank you to my colleagues for
your patience and accumulating questions
and letting this wonderful team finish
their presentation
so
now
i know i'm sure there are questions
comments who would like to begin maybe
director knowles since usually you have
to wait till the very end
just just an offer it's just an offer
actually while you guys are coming up
with questions can we acknowledge the
high school principals who are here with
us in the audience and just ask you guys
to
wave because we've got a number of our
high school principals
thank you
director martin
oh you're ready to go i got one oh sorry
okay director nils
so um this is i think this is for sarah
i'm just trying to get the completion
rate
straight in my head
um
so can you just
i just don't i don't understand the
difference between
um what's there between a fifth year and
a complete or completer rate
is it or
so
um
okay so you can complete in either four
or five years just like you can graduate
in either four or five years so um
the a completer what's different about a
completer versus a graph somebody who's
just a graduate i'm going to start there
um is that a completer
um is somebody who is who either
graduated and or they got their g they
basically got their ged
01h 05m 00s
i mean that's so where it says here
graduated on this slide
it really is someone who didn't like
graduate i i guess why does it say
graduated is when i where i got confused
um
so
it's the grand total of everyone who
graduated plus had the ged right so a
completer is always going to be a
completion rate so it's going to be
higher than the four-year cohort rate
because it's going to include everyone
who graduated plus everyone who got a
ged
so i guess that's what it says yeah okay
so we had 1350 kids who graduated from
all of our high schools
and then we had 112 who got their geds
yeah actually and that that um
that number right there it should
actually be 175 the guy ged that's
that's just the white population that's
on there i was just noticing that that's
why i kind of scooted through that but
yeah so we had about
um
we had in our cohort we had three
thousand
three hundred and eighteen students and
a hundred and seventy-five of those got
their ged okay
all right
thanks i just because it's a great i
just got confused yeah that's easy and
then i had a question about um the
five-year issue that we've been talking
about where students can actually
graduate can graduate but stay on for
another
do we have anything in our current
policies that prohibits students from
doing that
from staying for a fifth
we don't we don't have anything
currently in the policy and
we are doing research on that right now
currently and have a meeting coming up
shortly and we'll be able to report back
to you all do we know if we have
information sorry do we know if we have
very many students who are doing that
we don't have any who we don't have
currently okay in pps and something you
have to proactively decide to do because
once somebody's awarded a diploma you
keep paying their tuition right and
that's something that some of the
smaller districts have done
intentionally as a program and there's
been concern if the larger districts did
it right that you're breaking the state
school fund and we're looking at either
like going forward and
doing it and encouraging the state to
come up with some kind of an
uh category of funding that addresses
that in between right uh community
college and uh but we don't have
anything in our policies right now our
students shouldn't do it now right okay
right and it's being hailed as a really
innovative wonderful thing to do which
yes but it's also coming out of k-12
funding
so
i think it's it cuts yeah it cuts down
the amount of money we all have for the
for the 12 years or 13. so i'm just
going to kind of work through this just
a little bit um i do want to um
say i was so happy to see our graduation
rates go up again so thank you to
everybody the principals all of our
staff
everybody
that was such fantastic news um
i know it's just going up a little bit
each year but you know i've been on the
board for six years and now it's like 12
points or 17. 17 points when i started
wow so um
slow and steady i guess but you know
much as i would love to see it all jump
up to a 100 percent right now the slow
and steady we're getting there and i
i just have to say thank you to
everybody who's worked so hard on all of
that
and then my other question was around
summer scholars you um mentioned that
there was a
the summer scholars program last year
was free for some
did
when is that free because that was one
of the concerns i had earlier a couple
of weeks ago when we had a presentation
and it indicated summer scholars we
charged students for that and i was
hoping that we could fix that so the
june effort was very intentional for
seniors in summer scholars and what we
did was we offered the school so this
was it was it was a coupling of funding
right so
schools were offered credit recovery
dollars to provide credit recovery
options specif
providing a priority right so seniors
that were two credits from graduating
were the priority
before august 31st
if seniors were already because we did
it in june some seniors and their
families had already decided that
they're going to do summer scholars so
while we were if they paid for it we
actually reimbursed them this past fall
if they if they had a barrier counselors
often know about that and so that money
also went toward providing them with
tuition
so in addition to that we also provided
transportation so bus tickets for summer
scholars so that was all a part of that
effort to eliminate barriers to either
graduating or getting back on track
okay
and then i had a question about avid and
where are we with avid in the middle
schools
i saw there's a grant possibility so i'm
addressing i'm thinking um actually
we're going to bring some yes we have an
opportunity from two partners um
one is to expand our avid at the high
school level and it's something that we
01h 10m 00s
would get dollars from the partner to do
a number of aspects of the training and
build the libraries and um
and we would need to put up some money
so you're going to see this come forward
in the budget ask
that would where we need to pay
for people's time to actually
participate in the training then we have
a second funding source that is
interested in supporting us
expanding avid in our middle school so
we currently have avid and two of our
middle schools and three of our high
schools this would allow us to expand
across all of our middle schools and all
of our high schools if all of the
principals are interested in doing it
and we're in that process right now
and that includes uh the elementary
model it's gonna say six eight
okay
although i will say the the middle
school one does all the middle schools
and we would pilot one k-8 and then
we're general fund funding the
elementary
general fund
and or title so
okay
i'll stop there so that other people can
get a turn other folks would like to go
next
director morton so i i don't know if i
have any questions maybe some general
comments um
and i i have to say i i kind of
struggled with the flow of tonight's
presentation
um with a summary of our graduation
rates
which i appreciate that that summary
and the transition into
uh some of the tools that that we're
using
currently early warning system
some tracking
tools
and i think i i've been particularly
around
when i can see such
such drastic differences and for your
cohort graduation rates across
particularly communities of color
um
i i wonder uh
where our sort of our human contact is
in this and uh
and
you know this
the
meaning that uh a you know
and
notice the progress towards graduation a
dashboard these are really important
tools for us to be able to track for us
to be able to record
hopefully for us to be able to create an
early warning system that allows us to
understand i mean i think i mentioned
this
last year when we talked about it or
before the budget process
that
ninth grade is not an early warning
system
uh that's a pretty late warning system
but uh but i really am left thinking
gosh where
what do we what do we do when we have
you know four to five hundred kids per
counselor
um is the dashboard going to help us
with those students probably not
but we might be able to track them as
they drop out
the um
i also
you know was kind of struck at
you know national research center for
career and technical education says cte
is a strong predictor for boys staying
in high school
another really strong indicator i think
is authentic relationships with teachers
and counselors and adults and peers in
the classrooms and in the building
and i would really love to hear how are
we building relationships with our
students because particularly across our
students of color i know within the
native community
we have a generational um
relationship that has been broken
and one that i don't see specific
efforts in uh repairing that
relationship
and that's what i'm that's what i'm
really curious about if we're going if
we're serious about increasing beyond an
incremental
bump
uh to me
uh
you know a
44 graduation rate for native students
versus a 47 graduation for native
students i can be
i can be thankful that it rose by three
percent but
less than half the kids in my community
are graduating
uh so i'm really interested in hearing
how we uh how we take this information
and how we take these tools
and what do we use how do we use these
to really uh supplement the personal
relationship building work that's
happening with our kids in our schools
so that's that was kind of my really
just
unvarnished struggle with
uh with this and perhaps this
presentation isn't the presentation to
talk about that but it's really
something for future reference that i'm
interested in hearing about
so that wasn't the question that was
just uh
well just to let you know that when we
think of other early learning systems
really goes all the way to elementary
01h 15m 00s
school
i mean to the primary grades right
one of the things that we're proposing
in this budget is to look at the
counselor ratio
for middle schools
so we're going to come with some
some ideas you know and and like i said
this will be up for discussion in terms
of the budget
but that's why we're looking
figure out ways in which we can engage
our families early on
how do we work with our cbo's with
community-based organizations so they
can help us
reach our
communities of color not only
underrepresented but also in terms of
the
linguistical
so director martin i so appreciate that
reflection
um
i do
so i do want to address a bit of what
you spoke to the relationship piece is
critical and i started my segment with
acknowledgement to the collaboration
that takes place and i do and i also
agree with you i don't think it was
captured
uh in this presentation maybe in the way
that we could have captured it
but some of the pieces that are taking
place
are very relationship based
so
working with you know the office of
equity and partnership dunya minou and
sun school step up a plethora of other
individuals like the new attendance
coordinators outreach coordinators
counselors
a lot of the impact that's taken place
has has
very little we do monitor we do analyze
we do track right
but it has a lot more to do with the
relationship of a charles mckenney who's
at franklin as an outreach coordinator
and the relationship of amber mcgill or
the relationship of sylvia or the
relationship of holly the counselor
with those students
and the relationship of those students
with all of those individuals
simultaneously
so there is a lot
taking place at the ground level that is
unfortunately we i wasn't able i would
say i wasn't able to capture very well
because you know we're trying to provide
an update
and i think that there is opportunity to
tell those stories as well
because
handing
656 students warmly to counselors and
vps vice principals and other outreach
coordinators
is is not just here's a name it's i did
a house visit i made phone calls i got
to know the family
you know the family is now meeting with
their new vice principal their new
principal or their new counselor
we're sending we're making phone calls
during the summer
the high school staff are to the rising
ninth graders so so there's a lot that
does take place that is very
relationship based because our
communities the latino community as well
has
has a lot of stake in the ground and we
owe our communities that access
so so there is a lot of a lot taking
place and i'm sorry that that wasn't
captured here and i think there's
opportunity to to do that
and i i really appreciate you
offering offering that clarity and i
think that
as we're moving closer sort of inching
into budget time i think it's really
important for us to as as a board and as
executive staff who will be presenting a
budget is that we're looking for that
what is that human element what is that
relationship relational um piece that
that we can build upon and we can invest
in because that's going to be the
difference maker it's the tip of the
spear for what we do as as a district
and it makes all the difference in the
world so i appreciate you bringing that
night
um yeah i appreciate it great thanks no
thank you
how about folks
director belial
well first i just want to say uh
director martin that your unvarnished is
better than my um polished
but thank you for providing that frame
because i found myself
with a public testimony earlier today
hearing about
an attendance initiative that then lost
its funding
here we get high school graduation
knowing that they're building
connections with students and buildings
and now it's being defunded and so i
just wanted to highlight
that i hope we're continuing that as we
begin to look in our budget
and when i hear director morton talk
about early warning systems really
one of the earliest warning systems that
we have in our k-12 system is attendance
in kindergarten
i mean there's a clear pattern of
01h 20m 00s
students whose attendance is not very
good in kindergarten as we've tracked
them through our our schools and so i
hope that we're really looking at that
and investing
because i do think that it involves that
human relationship how do we transition
students into school and so
um we've been spending a lot of time
in other parts of my life looking at
attendance and what are practices that
really make the difference and it really
is about teachers engaging it's really
about the school system engaging person
to person so i was really glad to hear
you talk about teachers how do we how do
we free up or make available those
opportunities to allow our educators
reach out to the students to build those
relationships before or after we have
folks in our in our audience who are
still holding up signs saying please
hear us and it's about going to our
community not expecting them to always
come to us so i just want to really
highlight that as we look into our as we
look at our budget
i also was surprised that
i didn't hear much about teaching
practices because once we get the
students here right
how are we making whatever we're doing
yes cte yes but those have been in
schools before and we've
we've consistently had a disparate
outcome so what are we doing does
anybody can somebody talk to me about
how are we evaluating our educators or
how are we supporting our educators
to make sure that what they're teaching
is engaging them in a way that feels
relevant and responsive
i think what i could share and offer is
that we have done
a lot of cross-collaboration work
between the departments and in the next
two presentations you're going to hear
some of those deeper dives of where
we're going you know kind of in that
human way right with kids and with
teachers and what are some of the
strategies that we're
utilizing for our students of color our
males of color pledge and with office of
teaching and learning so i i think
you're going to get some of that
as we go further
into the presentations this evening
great thank you i also want to highlight
something that i had mentioned uh
maybe now a month or a month or two ago
when i after i went to the courageous
conversations conference about how
for native american youth especially
cultural identity actually not investing
in more tutoring
investing in more tutoring didn't
actually get the outcomes we were hoping
for but it was about cultural identity
how do we provide them a sense of
belonging and sense of positive self
and history about what systems they're
working in navigating
so again as we look at budgets i'd be
really curious about how do we invest to
be intentional about that
and then my last question is uh the
is about the slide that talks about the
late entrance
the folks who come to us in 10th grade
11th grade 12th grade or never enroll
i'm curious how that seems like a pretty
sizable 20 of our cohort
um i'm curious do we have any statistics
on how that compares with other
districts in our area or in the state
you know i don't right off the top of my
head but i think that would be something
important to look at because i've heard
other districts i know in our area talk
about how if if we have them at ninth
grade there's a really good chance and
i'm just not sure what yet our numbers
look like compared thanks great
director
roosevelt 53 what are we doing
now that we weren't doing then
anything or we can look at 53
next year and the next year i mean are
we doing something at roosevelt to uh
to
turn around a 53 graduation rate that's
specific to roosevelt that we're doing
now that we weren't doing that
yeah so i know that there's been
an attendance initiative with
coordinators some attendance
coordinators that are specific for the
roosevelt cluster
and i'm hoping that you'll hear a little
bit more about that in
the presentation
that's going to come after us as well
we're also looking at some of the
programming that's happening there so
cte
programming um are you know they've also
adopted advanced scholars and also just
you know core how are we moving through
moving students through that
um and you know looking at stem and
steam uh george and roosevelt were
recipients of a sizeable ode grant in
order to
implement some really specific
strategies around there so so
we're moving in the right direction with
roosevelt and um charlene is
spearheading for the cluster she she was
previously the principal there and is
now the senior director of the cluster
and is also working
so
so we're
doing an attendance initiative of some
01h 25m 00s
sort
are we adding any people like we had cut
the
uh
we had cut the social service
coordinator out of there we putting her
back or somebody back in that position
that was i mean we had a big drop after
she left
are we putting somebody back in that
position
so i'm going to do a couple things in
here just because roosevelt
the point that we were when we were
talking about people who enter after
ninth grade roosevelt's cohort that we
were just looking at 208 students 40 of
them entered after ninth grade
28 of those are still with us this year
in their fifth year um and as you saw
like for roosevelt that was
a situation that was really pronounced
at roosevelt where you had a large
number and part of our effort at
roosevelt has been to bring kids back to
roosevelt and we've been success so
we've increased enrollment we've
successfully brought kids back to
roosevelt and some of them are coming
back
after ninth grade and i think some of
our effort now is what are the kind of
supports we need to build if they're
coming back and they're not on track if
they're coming we them they're coming
back we're gonna go looking deeper now
where did they come from and what are
the kind of supports we need to be
adding specifically that support them if
they're coming back and entering because
we know even a single transition in your
high school time
creates a a challenge for you in terms
of being on track so that's one thing
two one of the things we're doing in
this budget cycle as you know is looking
at our school-wide support table which
is looking at
people like counseling ratios
social workers any other kind of
supports that are that we're putting in
buildings and that's one of the efforts
of the district staffing team is taking
a look at people like nora the kind of
role that nora provided at roosevelt the
attendance coordinators that you're
seeing that we're doing in a cluster as
opposed to school specific but it's
adding
other support um people and really
looking at what are the ones that um
that are ones that are going to be most
high leverage in terms of kind of
impacts we're looking for so those would
be two things
so we have attendance coordinators that
are going to be new next year to
roosevelt or they're new this year we've
got some that are new this year yeah so
what and what role do they play
supporting kids
and families and going to homes and
attendance yeah they act as counselors
so to speak
so
they're working alongside the counselors
so it's a so if you think of it as the
building the infrastructure they are
part of the puzzle that wraps around the
student and so the counselor as we know
has 400 students on their caseload they
can't they don't have the capacity to go
to do home visits
so the attendance right so the
attendance coordinator and an outreach
coordinator have
they are specific for that so they're
not just tracking attendance and making
calls to the house but they're actually
making home visits they're inviting the
family in they are literally sometimes
picking up the student or picking up the
family for a visit um to the school so
they provide they build capacity in a
way that the counselors i know want to
do but don't don't have the time to do
that and so again it's about building an
infrastructure where that where we're
wrapping students around putting a
puzzle together so that so that we build
the capacity
to wrap the student up with
the right supports that are specific for
them so not every student not every
student will have an attendance
coordinator but that student may may
have an outreach coordinator
so we're trying to figure out very
intentionally how to personalize
services for their needs
and so that's the job of an attendance
coordinator or an outreach coordinator
so there's two people this year that
they didn't have last year so currently
so
that's a question that that so
currently there's an outreach
coordinator under the hsgi grant
so that coordinator has always been has
been at roosevelt for the last roosevelt
cluster for the last three and a half
years and we added an attendance
coordinator so that he added one person
i'm not sure what the number is not
either yeah we can find out exactly
how many attendance coordinators for the
roosevelt cluster i mean there are many
schools
let's keep going with your list but i
can name it
bellow says that there were three people
at it
this year and that may very well be true
okay we so my function is i collaborate
with
the person who oversees the attendance
coordinators with who's doing yaminu and
we have a great collaborating
relationship and and but i don't know
exactly there were there were a number
of folks hired
um to help with this effort and so i'm
not exactly sure how many are at the
roosevelt but it it sounds three sounds
right but i can't confirm so that could
be followed between me and we keep going
with your listeners
01h 30m 00s
and a couple were just tired like a
minute ago like they literally were just
added so
yeah uh
the cte will be online next year at
roosevelt yes so we are currently
working we've identified um five areas
that roosevelt will be five pathways
that roosevelt will be implementing
implementing over the next few years so
they will have
starting with engineering for next year
and then there are four other pathways
that they will be adding
as well so next year there's going to be
five classes of cte that they didn't
have this year no so so five pathways
that roosevelt will be implementing over
the next couple of years and when i say
pathways uh state certified cte programs
and pathways so they'll be starting with
engineering and then
we've identified the others that will be
implemented and currently working on the
timeline teacher certification and all
of the components that come with that so
what's our best guess how many
new classes of cte will there be a
roosevelt this coming year that weren't
there this year right so part of that
will depend on student numbers
forecasting i can't give you an exact
number but the opportunity will be
presented for students that want to take
that so we will make you know if we need
to make five classes of that we'll make
you know one pathway we will if we need
to make three we will and go from there
are you talking about classes or course
courses
pathways well i'm talking i'm saying
courses and classes is the same thing
they're not no no they're not well i'm
saying them i'm using them that's the
same in other words if i'm a kid at
roosevelt
high school next year
i i get my i get what i can sign up for
correct how many
cte classes are on there that i can sign
up for that are new
right so we're working on that right now
we will have a
few entry-level classes in
cte programs that won't maybe yet be
state certified there's a whole process
that we have to go through with that
and we're working on that we have a few
teachers in place there they've been
philippe and sue brent and a few others
have been working very hard on that
so what i can tell you is that there
will be cte courses offered at roosevelt
next year and we will be developing the
five certified pathways over the next
few years and i think in a pretty short
period of time we'll be able to give you
a timeline and nail down the specifics
how many care teams do they have at
around the school another how many how
many kids have care teams that are
working within the sick team is correct
let's take madison madison how many how
many kids actually went through a care
team process
that we had set up in some way to work
with a particular child at madison
last year approximately i mean was it
190 or was it three yeah
or was it none i don't know are you
talking about care teams or sit teams
i'm using i'm interchanging the two
because they keep getting interchanged
as as they keep getting interchanged in
the discussions or are they different
they're different
no so we have the equity care teams and
then we also reference the care teams
that are
that were used in hillsborough
um so that's why
so what do we have we have we what are
we specifically calling at madison high
school sit teams sit teams that's right
so how many how many kids last year
or this year at madison high school in
the first half of the year approximately
did our sit teams actually
you want to use the word service service
would be fine
so we can get you the answer to that
currently we are implementing through
the early warning system in
collaboration with the office of equity
and partnership rick kirshman we are
implementing sit teams
in three of our clusters franklin
jefferson and roosevelt madison
well madison has a function of a sid
team
we are
currently however in a more formal
fashion
implementing sid teams in those three
clusters it's because of a grant that we
received out of out of the state
but are we implementing sit teams in
madison next year
without the grant
i mean this seems to be like this seems
to be such like a such a critical thing
but but the answer to my first question
is none we didn't have no that's not
that's not the that's not the answer the
answer is they have a form of a sit team
and we are also formally doing them in
three other clusters the the objective
is
to create sid teams throughout all of
our clusters okay that's that's that's
the ultimate goal have we created the
01h 35m 00s
first half of this year had we created
any sit teams in those
in those in any of our schools yes okay
in madison are we creating any the first
half of this year i will get you the
answer to that okay
next question and actually i'm just
going to remind people when we use
acronyms to say what they stand for so
other people understand what we're
talking about yeah okay so that's fine
they were fine
stands for student intervention team
so how many kids do we if we take this
i'm i was confused when we talked about
the 750 hours on the section under the
high school graduation initiative
project that's the that's the grants
that we've got that's
yes that's the federal grant
that's no that's the oh that's the grant
that was awarded in 2010 it's a federal
grant out of the united states
department of education and the new rent
is under it's an early warning system
grant to implement an early warning
system out of the state it was awarded
this past year right and we like and
it's wonderful that we're doing that by
the way but what's the
760 hours over a year or after school
participation what it takes to improve
grades and attendance what's up 760
50 hours of the kid or 750 hours no of
participation in of participation so we
have an external evaluator that
evaluated elements of the hsgi program
or project grant
and one of the findings is that 750
hours of participation by a student
per year is what it takes to actually
improve significantly attendance and and
their academics 750 hours for
participation in what in after school
programming
sunday school step up right campfire
after school programming includes
doesn't does that include athletics
well and that's a great ques that is a
great point
so part of
as we noted that's an intensive model
it's 90 almost 94 days of participation
for a student so part of the work in the
early warning system is
how do we
honor that finding
knowing that it's an intensive
after-school model but perhaps use it as
a tiered system and so we use things
like
maybe it's the the athletics the middle
school pro athletics maybe it's coupled
with some other sort of support service
during the day so step up provides
support services during the day as well
not just after school
so
maybe it's
some saturday school so we're trying to
be creative about that 750 hours because
we know that it's an intensive model and
not all programs it's also expensive for
programs like sun school or step-up to
be able to hit that
goal
and so how do we do it in collaboration
with them but using and leveraging the
existing support pieces that can add up
to that so that we're impacting students
so just to note that we do have two more
lengthy and important presentations
tonight
maybe but you might also maybe can
highlight the survey pick these pick the
questions that are most important to you
and maybe some of them kind of stuff
here i have the ones marcus stars that
are the most fabulous
okay
uh
the period by period i i think that i
have teacher friends again would like to
have me ask this question the period by
period attendance we're going to put on
the dashboard
that means we're taking attendance every
period
including tardies and we're recording
them some way they're doing it on the
computer right to just pop it on there
and it all comes in automatically
right okay uh
you said that we had a focus group that
had
counselors and administrators on it
no teachers yeah so here's the deal with
that our unfortunately our data
dashboard right now
is not accessible to teachers
one of the and this is something we're
working on it's a really top priority
for us
working with it on this the tool um has
the personally identifiable information
for 47 000 of our students literally
their home phone number all the way to
who they live with and we need a way to
be able to limit which data
various folks see and so it's a very
very high priority for us to get the
data dashboard into the hands of
teachers but we have and actually our
community partners for that matter
like step up like some of these partners
but we need to be able to ensure the
privacy of that information and we're
not able to do that yet so that and and
that's um
we're working on that literally right
now um in hopes that we'll have
something up next year so that's why we
don't have that for teachers this was
01h 40m 00s
literally just a view for administrators
and ours and like i said select school
staff
cte and middle school do we have any
do we have any plans
that are actually
planned plans not just thinking about it
down the line looking at it but actually
are we in
do we have anything in planning that
we're looking at around cte and middle
school
yeah so for this year
jeanne yorkovic who
has led cte for quite some time
has really been doing a lot of intensive
research to see if we can get
experiential
learning opportunities for our youth our
middle grade programs this year
we're running into a few roadblocks with
capacity issues so we're creating a
you know kind of a menu of options that
students would that would be able to
present to our school students would be
able to access so it might not look the
same across every school for capacity
but we're going to be working on that
for future but we are working on that
for this year
so next year you might see some cte in
some middle schools that we don't have
now i think that our we'll see some
opportunities this year and yes you will
also see additional um ct opportunities
equipment and some
other components for next year the uh
okay i'm moving down the line here thank
you
what do you have
one of the things that people thought of
was culturally relevant curriculum
particularly history and so forth
mr morton
referenced that
and
do we have any plans for that kind of an
improvement
culturally relevant curriculum
particularly around let's say history
in the in elementary grades first eighth
grade so i know the iot always looking
on the adoption of the language arts
in my right
and so
we have a team that is looking at what
is out there
and how it's uh how is addressing
the cultural relevancy
that we need our curriculum to have
that's no okay last question maybe oh
sure and i also want to make sure our
student representative gets a chance to
win sure um just maybe not necessarily
something you have to answer tonight but
how can we link um 8th grade reports of
attendance especially using our system
two high schools so the student comes in
not like right there they're targeted
rather than the month goes by and then
the attendance pops up
yeah so we um we actually have some
dashboard reports that do allow
our high school principals to view
incoming information about the students
that they serve actually currently in
the dashboard i think the biggest
challenges is making sure that people
know that they exist
and that they know how to navigate and
get to them and so we're working on
creating kind of a
some more training around that
thank you yep
franklin's
new system they were pretty upset a lot
of teachers seem to be about the
having difficulty with the relationships
with the students
with the new system
it just you know and yeah we say that
that's our critical the critical almost
the critical thing
for keeping kids in school is that
relationship with the teachers and staff
and so forth and i just thought i'd kind
of reference that i don't know i hope we
do some real good work around that next
year frankly
which new system are you talking about
which system well where you put they
moved
they they moved teachers out of the
classrooms during the day and so forth
up into the offices and that type of
stuff where i know they tried to make as
much effort as they could to kind of
make it work but the whole idea you know
we kind of bought into that model
of redesigning that school so i don't
know going to do okay whatever i just
was referencing it so we'll look into it
thank you very much i have an answer
about the coordinators we confirmed it
is three
okay
thank you very much
three
tennis coordinators
so thank you so much thank you thank you
so thanks everybody for your good
questions and discussion i'll just say
um briefly for my part um i really
appreciate the disaggregation not just
by race but by gender and that you shine
the light on that it's really important
like everybody i want to just applaud
the great work of the entire staff and
all parts of the district and these
gains that we're seeing closing the gaps
01h 45m 00s
obviously there's still unacceptable
disparities as you said as we all know
and that we have tons of more work to do
but just to pause a moment and and thank
you um so much for the gains that we are
seeing um so with that i think we need
to move on to our next um topic but
thank you all very much
thanks thanks also to all the principals
for being here and all that you do
so the next
all right so the next agenda item is an
update on talented and gifted
superintendent smith would like to
introduce this um yes melissa goff who's
our assistant director of teaching i
mean our assistant superintendent of
teaching and learning will be presenting
this report
thank you
and i'm i'm inviting uh mark feldman who
is the chair of our talented and gifted
student advisory council to join me
uh along with johanna colgrove who also
serves on tag
um
well hi
and you just keep growing
um so
what i wanted to do and thank you for
giving us this opportunity to talk a
little bit about talented and gifted
services
i am going to try and pull up our
presentation here
perhaps
perhaps i could have someone help me
pull this up oh there
oh there we go magic i don't have to
touch anything
um so thank you very much for the time
to address
the board tonight
i
am having technical difficulties
slideshow up top
all right
to get us started what i would really
like to do is start from
the macro
in this room and move down to the micro
of the presentation so
to begin if i could just ask if you are
a parent or a family member or you
yourself are a talented and gifted
student could you please just raise your
hand please
so i thought it was important for for
all of us to know that
that talented and gifted students are
well represented here tonight and well
represented within our district as well
i also thought it was important to
have us focus on the fact that not only
do we have very strong
families who are advocating for talented
and gifted education within our district
we also have strong staff investment as
well so i did want to introduce three
staff members who are here with me
tonight one is a new hire to pps i'm
very proud that we've actually been able
to hire a program director full-time for
talented and gifted i've been in my i've
worked here in pbs for five years and
during my tenure we have not had a
full-time person on talented and gifted
so it's a very exciting addition i'd
like to uh welcome andrew johnson who's
seated in the front row
here and since andrew just started last
week i'm going to let him sit in the
front just this time i just said you let
him do the whole presentation
and then i also wanted to uh introduce
two of our teachers on special
assignment who've been working to
support
teacher professional development and
that is tesla schulte and and
kathy daly
so tonight what we will be sharing with
you is a brief
data review and policy review looking at
the current school board policies that
we have then we will have time for the
talent and gifted parent advisory
representatives to share specific
information uh regarding recommendations
that that that what we lovingly refer to
as the tag act
committee has
arrived at and actually shared with this
board in writing um i believe at least
twice we've we've
we've had that shared with you but
actually having our families be able to
speak to that and then we'll share a
little bit about the alignment where we
are aligned currently where our next
steps are as well
so we're beginning with background
information and i thought it was
important for us to stay rooted within
the board policy so first with our
racial educational equity policy stating
that the district shall remedy the
practices including assessment that lead
to the over-representation of students
of color in areas such as special
education and discipline and the
under-representation in programs such as
talented and gift gifted and advanced
01h 50m 00s
placement
and it's important for us to be looking
at data as we are measuring our
ability to be effective in meeting the
demands of that policy so i'm going to
explain this complicated graph
so this graph is tag identification by
race and on the far left for those uh in
the
who are seated behind me who may not be
able to read we start with
the ethnic groups moving from left to
right asian black african american
hispanic latino multiple races native
american or alaskan native native
hawaiian or other pacific islander and
the final group is white
so i want to explain what the what this
graph means this reflects the over or
under representation of students who
have been identified as talented and
gifted and looks at that by race
so to read the graph
as an example
71
of our talented and gifted students
identify as white
56
of pps students identify as white
so what you do is you take
the first number subtract the second
number and that gives you
a result that indicates if it's a
positive number an over representation
and if it's a negative number an under
representation within the graph
so the visual here you can see
reflects that
particularly black and latino students
are under represent underrepresented in
our talented and gifted identification
and
by the same note our white students are
over identified when you look at the
the numbers
so then the policy that we have existing
around talented and gifted education and
this is an area where
we will concur there is there is room
for improvement in the work that we're
doing around policy and administrative
directives the talented and gifted
education policy we have states that the
district is committed to an educational
program that recognizes the unique value
needs and talents of the individual
student curriculum and instruction
should be designed to meet the level and
rate of learning of talent and gifted
students and be an integral part of this
commitment
so when we're looking at the
effectiveness of our educational program
there are a few data points that i
wanted to share with you that um that
aligned with the priorities of uh the
district and where the superintendent
has us focusing right now so the first
is looking at third grade reading meets
or exceeds so when you look from left to
right
it's the last three time uh the last
three years in time frame and we have
between 97 99 of our talented and gifted
students who are meeting or exceeding
um their reading benchmarks and that's
as indicated by the state assessment
system
then
the next graph is taking a look at the
same data that was shared with you in
the former presentation but broken out
more specifically to reflect talented
and gifted specifics for the four-year
cohort graduation rate the four-year
cohort completion rate the five-year
cohort grad rate and the five-year
cohort completion rate and
2011 performances on the left and the
most recent data that we have is to the
right so you can see that our four-year
cohort graduation rate for our talented
gifted students is at 91
and our five-year cohort completion rate
for our talented and gifted students
stands at 97 percent
so with that i'm going to hand the mic
over for the next 15 minutes to our
talent and gifted advisory council and
then we'll come back and
cover a few more things
thank you
uh good evening and i also want to thank
you for this opportunity to address you
tonight
i also i want to let everybody else who
may not have seen the recommendations
know that they are available on the tag
department website
i also
want to point out that the tag act has
not had
any high school members so the
recommendations that we've produced
mostly apply to elementary schools
and about grades k-8
i'd like to start by thanking all the
current and former tag members who
reviewed our draft recommendations month
after month
could
tag members i think we have most of them
here
raise their hand
brenda ray scott our 2012 chair
made really sure that the tagged parent
survey happened
terese bushnell joanna colgrove and
01h 55m 00s
others drove developing these
recommendations
diana ortiz-garcia is the chair of our
equity committee which is ramping up
this year
shelley mcfarland and nicole ero hero
zillardo co-chair our communications
committee
numerous parents came for a few meetings
over the past few years to give us input
and we greatly benefited from
discussions with several teachers along
the way as well
i know that our members are very
encouraged by the recent investment in
hiring a full-time
tag administrator with a strong tag
background
so thank you superintendent smith for
letting that happen and to melissa for
making that happen
during the void we really appreciated uh
tony hunter's honesty and responsiveness
as our interim tag administrator
we also appreciate melissa goff's
openness to discussing our
recommendations even though we know we
don't see eye to eye on all of them
i think we have two things that we want
to persuade you of tonight that there
are serious ongoing issues
and that our recommendations are
reasonable
the former
may
come across somewhat negatively at times
but i want to assure you that we do
aspire
to be a team oriented advisory
to have a team oriented advisory
relationship and we do want to
constructively support our school
district
when we started putting together this
presentation we thought it was really
important to speak to what our values
were in
what we wanted and looking at what
strong tag services meant but also that
not just tagster
students because clearly there's
problems with identification but all
students deserve challenging education
we need equity where all kids get what
they need without requiring heroic
parental involvement
it should not be dependent on parents to
advocate for their kids to get them the
challenges that they need
and we want to simplify the system for
the benefit of teachers the school
district and mostly the students
and the parents
some of our considerations when we
thought about what would be plausible
realistic
um we wanted to make it as budget
neutral as possible i'm sorry i can't
actually read with my classes on
if we're getting students if students
are being regularly assessed we should
be using those assessments to place them
appropriately not just know oh yeah
they're smart
then what
um
we have some great teachers in pps we
need to make it easier for them to do
their jobs not require heroic effort
from them to differentiate for 30
students
heroic effort is not a sustainable model
for anyone it leads to burnout for both
teachers and parents and the district
we also don't want pull outs we don't
think pullouts are education they're a
special one-off it's like dessert it's
not the meal
and the other thing is there's
some relevant oregon law pps policy
driving this that students should be met
at their rate and level they should be
served well and we really want to see
this happen
i'm going to head back to
mark okay
yes if you want
this is your slide
oh
okay
i have to say it was really uh hard
sitting here through the previous
presentations hearing about the you know
the stellar graduation rates of tag
students
and how well they're doing
on the test scores knowing that i was
going to have to come here and
present this slide which basically says
the district is failing tag students
but the goals that that we're
trying to see matt are those set by the
board
and they're also set by state lawmakers
so i think the expectation of meeting
them is is reasonable
it's probably worth
additional discussion at some point as
to how these two situations can
legitimately uh coexist at the same time
but the results of our of the 2012
parent tag survey did show widespread
dissatisfaction
and therefore we think evidence that the
goals are not being met
of course there were differences among
schools but the only
real exception was the alternative
education program access academy
access's survey responses were reversed
across the board
let me
read two of the
issues that were highlighted in the
survey
85 percent of district parents with an
opinion disagreed and 58 of access
parents agreed that the level of tag
services their child receives is
02h 00m 00s
consistent and does not depend on who
their teacher is
83 percent of district parents disagreed
and 89 percent of access parents agreed
that tag services have improved their
children's academic achievement
the results really scream out that
district-wide tag students don't feel
they're being supported well at least
their parents don't
we believe that access
offers an important example what of what
pps
could become by adopting some of the
practices there district wide
one of the only things we can point out
as a kind of a real kind of tag service
is single subject acceleration
this is when a student who has mastered
the grade level curriculum
goes on to a higher grade level
to study
that subject every day
we believe that a small number of
students do this every year although we
can't get in a real count of how many
but even ssa is not serving students
well because documentation about how it
works has historically been unavailable
and recently has been on and off
depending on who the tag administrator
was
parents who have tried it
report the principles and others deny or
strongly discourage it
we also believe that its 99 test
requirement can put a valuable practice
out of reach of many students who can
benefit
lake oswego school district for example
supports acceleration of students
achieving 80 percent
grade level
a mastery of grade level material
as an unintended consequence of written
level not being met
one unintended consequent may
consequence may be that tag families
disproportionately use the lottery and
petition process to search for better
instruction or something to replace it
a second analysis concluded that only 11
of k8 lottery applications were tag
identified
but focus and immersion schools admit by
lottery in kindergarten that's before
the district-wide tag testing in second
grade
if instead you look at only middle
school lottery applications after tag
identification
you see 22 percent are tagged compared
with 18 tag students at all middle
schools
it's possible the difference is even
greater for elementary schools where
three times as many students are using
the lottery
than at middle schools
also pointed out that above and beyond
the lottery
even more tag students use the petition
process
and then of course there's accesses wait
list
which is 100 tag students searching for
services
these patterns suggest that our
recommendations could help retain tag
students in neighborhood schools
in fact since almost nothing we are
suggesting depends on tag identification
they could be a concrete way to
strengthen academic
programs in general
as we understand it pps's solution for
meeting rate and level is that all
teachers should differentiate for all
students in all subjects
but our survey said that 63
disagreed that the child's teacher makes
adjustments to instruction and
assignments
this was even though 55 percent agreed
the classroom teacher understands the
needs of gifted students that was kind
of
strange
in person people
in person parents kept telling us that
despite good intentions and tag plans
differentiation just wasn't working in
math and often in reading
the articles in
the meeting materials show there was
quite a debate among education
educators about whether differentiation
actually works
both sides do seem to agree that
differentiation is really hard
we came to believe
that the range of achievement levels in
classrooms is just too wide to allow
consistent differentiation
we're not saying it can't work
but we do believe that it needs to be
combined with other practices that
narrow or distribute the range of
achievement levels while maintaining a
heterogeneous classroom
i urge you to read about the pitney
branch elementary school in the
altogether now article
it tells how the principle there used
differentiation successfully even while
balancing academic growth and high
diversity
the secret
they used
additional practices some very similar
to those that we're recommending
we think that our recommendations
describe a set of suitable tools that
will give teachers a fighting chance to
successfully differentiate
so tag is well aware of the under
identification of gifted students
02h 05m 00s
of color and generally at schools
serving lower income communities
i've personally gone through data on
this school by school and it's pretty
clear that something's wrong
our recommendations request additional
statistics related to this i hope a year
from now our equity committee will have
additional recommendations addressing
these issues
but some things are obvious now
consider this comment from the survey
giving additional homework fails to
appreciate how excruciatingly hard the
easy work seems to a tag student
answering the same easy questions over
and over feels like torture
i can tell you from personal experience
that a board student can quickly become
a misbehaving student
using rate and level to eliminate the
boredom is the solution
but it can be many referrals and many
stressed parent meetings before it's
clear that boredom is the cause or a
cause
single subject acceleration may look
like a solution
but confrontational meetings about this
can go on for a year and parents must
provide transportation to middle school
in fifth grade
i just can't imagine how a family
without a stay-at-home parent could
manage anywhere near this kind of heroic
advocacy
another issue is that when access stops
growing in 2016
about one in five openings will be
available before district-wide tag
testing
these slots will only be available to in
the no parents who realize the need to
ask for testing in kindergarten or can
afford to have it done
have outside testing done
finally
margaret delasi has examined
year-to-year academic gains of tag
students
compared to district averages she's
found that much
she's found a much bigger difference for
low-income hispanic and african-american
students among the students that exceed
than among low-scoring students
we don't understand this well yet but we
want to continue to track it
i get to talk about the positive stuff
so um
some themes for the improvements that we
looked at we wanted concrete effective
tag services for all neighborhood
schools my son goes to a neighborhood
school he has for his entire career he's
now in seventh grade
this will be too late for him really but
it still is very important we need to
adopt some best practices
we need to
um
if differentiation requires heroic
effort on the part of the teacher or the
part of parents it's not sustainable so
we need something else
to be very clear these recommendations
are just a starting point they are not
the final answer
but hopefully they can make things
better and reduce the amount of heroism
required
transparency is a big first start of
making things better
easing equity concerns if we have clear
policies guiding what we do then it's
available to everybody as opposed to
just those parents who know the right
person who knows the right person
we need to keep looking for better
methodology pps goals are good but the
methods need more work i think
um and we want to make differentiation
possible by not insisting on the widest
possible range in a classroom grouping
kids solely by chronological age
we long ago gave up on one room school
rooms which would be the widest possible
range
they're not an effective way of
educating our students
so we want to make sure the classroom
stay heterogeneous the research is good
but there can be fewer levels we don't
have to have the absolute widest span
we need to find solutions that don't
require tracking because everybody runs
away from that notion and for many good
reasons
but we need to have answers that are
driven by the student achievement not by
parents advocating for them
so here are our recommendations
boiled down
we want to place elementary and middle
school students in the appropriate level
math and reading classes
but i'm going to go into more of these
in more detail as we go we want to
reform the screening for single subject
acceleration
this year as far as we can tell from
district 30 students were evaluated one
student was accelerated
the amount of resources that took for 30
students doesn't really multiply well
for 48 000 students in terms of figuring
out there's got to be a better way to
tell what students need to be
accelerated
and it shouldn't be so scary to
accelerate a student by a single year
if they take fourth grade math as a
third grader and they don't do well they
can take fourth grade math as a fourth
grader and be fine it shouldn't be
so scary um we need to use flexible
grouping to narrow the range in classes
02h 10m 00s
there are a whole variety of models out
there that are showing a lot of success
we need to be looking at those and
finding better ways to do what we do
eliminate and repurpose the peg budget
i'm not going to talk about
too much
the district is working on this already
we should be providing centralized
resources we're not talking about
pullouts it hasn't been
used effectively across the district
it's not equitable
there's got to be better ways to use
that money and we shouldn't be pi
fighting over pennies
access academy i'm going to touch on
this only briefly
the access academy serves some tag
students but last year there were 200
qualified students on the waitlist
it should be able to
be big enough to accept all qualified
students or maybe a second school
and the last recommendation we've talked
a lot about already that we meet we need
better data we need to understand if we
accelerate students are they being
successful is that working long term for
them is it not working for them what can
we what programs can we be using to help
these kids and all kids be successful
and not just reach their benchmarks but
excel
it's like it's great that high school
students are meeting benchmarks tag
students are meeting benchmarks but they
should be way ahead and we don't even
know how far they are ahead or whether
we're getting them where they need to be
okay so here is our proposed model of
measures one through
three
these work together so it's important to
sort of understand
what we're doing here so i'm going to
try and make it clear like wave at me if
i'm not making sense
um
currently my understanding is that all
students are evaluated at the beginning
of the year to see where they are
and then the teachers are supposed to
use that in the classroom
so we think
that particularly in math and reading
those evaluations should be used to
place the kids appropriately in the
right level of math and reading class so
if they are in fourth grade and they can
manage all of the fourth grade
curriculum already in august and they've
got it mastered
they shouldn't have to do fourth grade
math again
they should get to move on
we think an 80 score is reasonable i've
had some people be like really 80 that
seems really high or really low
but if you think about
what's a passing grade
80 is still well above passing for the
end of a year assessment
so it's not such an unreasonable number
and we really think that that single if
it's one grade acceleration that needs
to stay in the school the school should
be able to manage that without the
district evaluation because otherwise it
just becomes too much of a burden for
the district
and if it's a burden for the district
then it's a burden for the school and it
slows everything down
and then beyond that for kids who test
at 99 percentile then you do some more
evaluation to see whether they're really
tagged
and you look at
whether or not access is the right
option for them
so once you get that assessment
particularly for math and reading you
place them in the right classrooms so
that's the start we're meeting their
level of nerd learning
okay all with me
so
students study at their level the
benefits acceleration are well
documented
there is a lot of research out there
sorry i lost my place there for a second
and we want to emphasize really that
this model is driven by student
achievement
not by parental advocacy
it should be based on what the students
are achieving in the classroom so that
the students who are achieving
regardless of gender regardless of skin
color regardless of cultural background
if they have this content mastered they
should be moving on
this slide was we had all sorts of
problems um
i had a slide of text that went with
this and somehow electronic transport
back and forth it disappeared into the
vortex
so
this is an example of flexible ability
grouping there are several different
kinds of grouping that different schools
are doing there are things called
cluster grouping there's flexible
ability grouping
so i'm going to try and
get the commonalities of that and the
idea is that you get much more
intentional about how you assign
students into classrooms you don't go
for the widest spread
so for example in this model that we
have here this could be used for a
classroom grade level so we have two
classes in third grade
02h 15m 00s
and we take that whole student
population and the current model is that
you would take that whole range of
abilities and you would try to divide it
as evenly as possible between those
school those teachers so
if you have four kids at the top of the
range you can put two in each classroom
and if you have four kids at the bottom
you put two in each classroom
so that every teacher has the maximum
range
the ability group classroom is still
keeping that idea that you want a range
but instead if you divided it into six
buckets
you take
one teacher gets buckets one three and
five and one gets two four and six and
suddenly you have a classroom that's a
little bit narrower it's a little bit
more focused you have tag students who
are grouped together so there's some
synergy there you have students who are
at the bottom who are grouped together
who are not i'm not the only person who
doesn't get this
you have students
in your second group who are now maybe
the smartest people and it's not always
the tag kids who are dominating
it just
there's some really good research out
there there's an article that we
included in the packet
explaining this more in detail
but it really serves the needs of the
students of
more focused teacher time it simplifies
the life of the teacher i've been
talking to a bunch of teachers about
this and they're like that makes total
sense it would make my life easier and
if we make the teachers lives easier
they can teach better
and apol apologies for interrupting but
just to point out we we are over time
for this entire presentation so maybe we
could okay
i am actually almost done because i
think that's
yes that's my last slide so mark's gonna
make the okay and this is this is the
the last our request slide is the last
slide
we know that some of our recommendations
clearly need to be
reviewed carefully by pps
educators
but i think single subject acceleration
is an exception
in 2010 the tag administrator created an
administrative directive discussing a
framework for the for math that would be
available to any qualified student
the chief academic officer at the time
carla randall signed the framework
acceleration is already a de facto
policy
it's been used successfully odyssey for
many years it was used access academy
accelerates over 75 percent of its
students one or more grades in math
and students are already occasionally
accelerated at neighborhood
elementary and middle schools
despite all this parents continue to
have problems requesting just requesting
an evaluation for this
and we were recently told by the tag
department this is not a policy
so we would like to request that you
adopt a policy
it should be formalized it's happening
it's de facto
we're just asking for what everybody
pretty much expects should already be
there
the tank survey the uh apparent tag
parent survey clearly showed that
something special was happening at
access academy yet their growth will
soon be limited
much smaller than an average k8
we'd like
to request that you ask drock to find a
permanent location where access can
expand to admit all qualified students
finally
we greatly desire the opportunity to
further
promote the grouping models that johanna
has
discussed with educators here at besc
and in schools
we look forward to continuing the
conversation about implementing our
recommendations thank you very much for
your time
all right
so i want to acknowledge what mr feldman
said about this being a really healthy
advisory and advocacy relationship uh
the
tagac team has been deeply engaged and
respectfully engaged
and
has
already
their advocacy has already led to some
changes within the system
and as he also said
we still share we have some differences
still in how to
best serve our students and and we're
continuing conversations in those areas
so i did want to share a few things
with you
one is the system improvements that
we've made this year so one i introduced
mr johnson earlier who's our full-time
tag program manager and our teachers on
special assignment who are here tonight
as well as was mentioned by johanna we
do have we have uh centralized our
talented and gifted budgets
because it was brought to our attention
that there was
really
concerning underspending at some points
and what we've seen is
02h 20m 00s
that schools have been better
accessing talented and gifted funds
since we've centralized
the dollars we've also shifted our
professional development approach to
address the pieces that you heard
tonight which is every student every
classroom needs to be meeting the needs
of our talented and gifted students and
in order to do that teachers need
professional development around both
creating a rigorous classroom and a
relevant classroom
so we've embedded that across all of the
professional development that we provide
from pps staff
and then we also have been reviewing the
identification system through our equity
lens
where we are in english language arts we
currently have a literacy assessment
committee that's taking a look at the
current assessments that that we're
using and the efficacy of those
assessments in identifying
student strengths and opportunities for
improvement and also informing teachers
as to appropriate next steps to support
students
we have a pk through 12 literacy
adoption process currently underway the
board
partially funded that
last year
and those dollars are
are still
in process this year
and then we also are looking at how we
improve our literacy reporting for
teacher use which was one of the pieces
that you also heard our our students and
families and teachers need to better
understand where our students are
performing in their literacy skills
and we've been providing professional
development specifically in flexible
grouping
in the area of mathematics we've been
budgeting for the purchase of extension
materials aligned to elementary
standards and bridges curriculum so
you will see that coming forth in the
budget that will be for the 1516 school
year we also have compacted math
pathways to create multiple entry points
for accelerated rate of learning at the
middle school level i i would also say
that we do have in place single subject
acceleration and one of our shared areas
of concern is lack of understanding
within the system
and
with our families on how to access that
component
for next steps we want to review tag
identification processes and
acceleration board policies
and the administrative directives
through an equity lens one of the areas
that
we
have room for improvement in is making
sure that those things that we believe
are
most important in serving our talented
and gifted students get reflected in our
administrative directives
we also
are preparing to review and procure
digital learning resources to support
differences in rate and level of
learning so that we can differentiate
within the classroom for students and
help relieve some of the tension that a
large range of student learning
paces creates for teachers who are still
learning themselves how to differentiate
within that model
and then we're working with systems
planning and performance around the
current reporting of talented and gifted
data and potential improvements and that
those reports
range from reports that go to families
but also reports that would be residing
on the school websites
and so i know that we are over time
tonight but we
we are happy to together answer
questions that you may have
great thank you so much
board members
questions comments
dr bill do you want to start this time
i see just one
one line on your notepad
but i didn't write down one of the
questions the first words
if we've got
three classrooms at school a in the
fourth grade
so
do we have anything new that we're
actually going to do
with the teachers or with the situation
or anything in the with those three
teachers in those classrooms that is
going to allow them or going to get them
to do a better job around
working with tagged children in their
classes because one of the things that i
see
is
you never talk to a teacher that
wouldn't want to do that but you know
but you can talk to 10 000 teachers who
say i mean i'm exhausted i mean we've
got them so pushed down that's very hard
to do and i'm not making excuse i'm just
saying are we addressing that in any way
or what do we got going next year by my
kids now and he was in the third grade
didn't get much now his fourth grade
what do i got in that fourth grade
classes that he going to get now that he
did or she so what i would say the
biggest shift has been is in our
professional development approach over
02h 25m 00s
the course of the last year so we have
really shifted as a system to look at
the national framework around
providing rigor and relevance to the
classroom and the rigor component
really is helping teachers see what
kinds of questions move
move to a depth of complexity so that
students are challenged within the
classroom and that professional
development we've embedded in whatever
professional development we're offering
so for our math professional development
or science professional development
that's embedded now in those pd pieces
are you speaking of the common core
we're going to use the can we talk about
the new we've got
professional development about
increasing questioning but i i don't
i don't know about anybody else out here
but i if i had a tag student it'd be
nice if he questioned i want to know
what
what curricular things that child would
be getting more questioning from the
teacher doing a better job doesn't
really
get it wouldn't really get it done for
me i guess
i mean it's like are we talking common
core and that's supposed to help the tag
situation it seems to me like maybe the
con i don't know what you're saying
melissa because it seems to me like the
common core is making it harder to
differentiate not easier because we're
pushing that pushing that pushing that
and it's creating some problems for tag
kids as well as for kids who are
struggling
trying to learn to read and all those
types of things
so as you know the common core the
adopted state standards in only literacy
which is english language arts and
mathematics so across the entire
spectrum of courses and subjects that
are taught to students we are expecting
teachers to develop the skill set of
being able to have varying levels of
rigor within the classroom and we're
training them around how to do that
so the questioning i'm not referring to
a questioning technique from the
standards i'm talking about the approach
yeah good luck with that
thank you so can i add something really
quickly i think um
but one of our points is with all due
respect
that
the research says that no matter how
much professional development you give
teachers on how to do differentiation
it's still too hard when the range is
that wide
there's a limited teacher has a limited
amount of prep time to prepare for each
of the groups right you've got fewer
groups with more kids in each group she
can he or she can do a better job
differentiating for each group right so
director below
first i want to say thank you for this
presentation i
for as long as i've been in pps i've
heard of disappointment in tag services
again we oftentimes attribute it to
funding and there are still things we
can be doing to be getting better
services to students so i appreciate
that and i do appreciate originally your
recommendation was to re reapportion or
repurpose
school budgets
for tag and i appreciate the
centralization beginning to be
systematic with that about how do we use
that investment because i heard
everything from you know we fund a field
trip to some place to oh whoops there it
went forgot we were supposed to spend it
right um so i appreciate um your efforts
um there are a couple of things and you
don't need to answer these or we don't
need a back and forth but i just offer
these as food for thought because these
were processes that went through my head
and these will feel a little bit more
not antagonistic but
challenging to some of the ideas like
when i hear things like
if a student
is accelerated to fourth grade math and
then they don't succeed in fourth grade
math they have fourth grade then when
they're there to figure it out
that's true unless the reason they
didn't success and succeed in fourth
grade math is that they missed a third
grade skill set and they missed it
because so now you have a fourth grade
teacher who needs to go back and teach
that fourth grade or third grade
do you see what i mean that it sounds
reasonable until we get into some of the
details
the second the second one that stuck out
to me like that was
the recommendation to assign students
they assess at the beginning of the year
assign students to the classes that
means students come in and that's not
really going to be their class
then we do a big shuffle say in october
to get them in the right classes which
is a transition
and if i begin to look at my equity lens
about the instability that creates
my guess is certain students will fare
well with that system and students
students certain students may not fare
well
with
starting school in september and then
entirely shifting or shifting
classes once once they get assigned to
their proper proper level so
it could be just an easy switch to
spring
um
but i believe my understanding when as
my kids are going through teachers do
sit around the table and they say okay
where does this make sense and
that brings me to the other point is
that this is really focused on academics
and the experience i've had and i've
02h 30m 00s
really appreciated about all the
teachers that i've experienced is that
they're multi they're balancing multiple
factors it's not just academics but it's
behavior
it's about what social aspects it's
about maturity it's about a number of
different things
so i just i caution us as we again just
look at assessment and student
achievement data
and that goes along with that the
reducing it to 80
again is if i look through with an
equity lens
my worry is that our current form of
identifying students is disproportionate
using that same identification and just
dropping it down to 80 percent i bet
will even perhaps increase our
disproportionality if not
um
it it definitely won't accommodate for
it i'll stop there in case somebody
wants to reply so i don't just ramble on
a short reply to that is that in our
actual recommendation about doing this
we say that
there's really no tag identification
necessary
right the teacher
they're evaluated at the beginning of
the year students just like
they would normally be and teachers can
use that
result they can use their judgment about
whether the child
works hard and didn't quite make it or
whether they have other issues even
though they've achieved you know 99 and
they shouldn't so
it just it creates a shifting at the
beginning of the year whether it's tag
or not yeah
and that
finally on that one is the talking about
buckets one through six it kind of
implies that that students are
in this bucket for all all
right because of the amount of time we
had and i appreciate that i just say
that we can see how complex it begets
really yes they're moving for this class
they're moving for that class and as the
state's looking at instructional hours
how do you do that effectively so i'm
not dismissing the idea but
um just wanted to acknowledge that it
feels
but i would like to answer your first
point of worrying about this disruption
of getting moved
as opposed to
the dissatisfaction boredom from kids
who aren't moved sure that's an
unacceptable option i'm just saying that
i'm not sure that solution gets to it
right
so now
to you miss goff um some questions and i
know miss director atkins were
low on time
um
i just you had brought up um
you had brought up middle school
compacted math and i've heard a lot of
folks talk about there's new math in
middle school
common core or our adoption does not
spiral like it used to so you can't go
back and revisit or reteach as much as
you could perhaps it does in some cases
how are we addressing that and i don't
think i understand middle school because
i i really have heard parents say well
my student can't learn like they've
already mastered this level they want to
they want to move on
but we're told we only we can only teach
this or that i'm told that they can only
teach sixth grade concepts or eighth
grade comp you know what i mean
they can't move ahead to their
next level
yes so a great question and i actually
asked the assistant director of
instruction curriculum and assessment
julie ryerson to be here specifically if
we had a compact math question bingo
bingo i have a kid doing it right now
i mean you do
it's for kids who learn at a faster
level
so a greater rate so they're doing
seventh and eighth grade i'm not
disagreeing with it i've just heard
parents say that
they've been instructed from staff
that they can't move ahead to a seventh
or an eighth grade level if they're at
sixth grade or vice versa and i'm i'm
wondering why is that perception in our
staff
and thank you for being here look i
asked the wrong question to keep you
here until 9
30. so um
to begin with i think i'll start with
the the sixth grade
so we
when we a couple years ago made this
shift as we were transitioning with
common core
we took a look at
what research was saying around
heterogeneous math instruction
and recommendations were to actually
hold off to the end of seventh grade
before making that
decision and so we wrestled with that
as a district and we also worked across
the state with other regional tosas and
with um
specialists from ode to
address that question of when is the
best time to start doing that
acceleration
so we
landed on in many districts and across
the state landed on
sixth grade let's keep that
heterogeneous let's really work with our
teachers
around differentiation so that we're
working on depth and complexity and
building deep conceptual understanding
because
that is a critical point in terms of
introducing variable introducing ratio
02h 35m 00s
you know ratio and proportional
reasoning um and and we know that down
the road how important those were going
to be so the compacted math then came in
for a seventh and eighth grade option so
still wanting to
provide an opportunity for students to
accelerate in middle school and so
students are then placed
based on three data points into either a
compacted math pathway
or into math seven and math eight which
as you know with common core in the
transition
almost 50 percent of what was in high
school now sat in six well actually
fourth grade through eighth grade but
mostly in sixth seventh and eighth grade
so students even in math seven and math
8 we're getting a much more rigorous
math curriculum so our students in
compacted
that identify for compacted they
actually complete so someone mentioned
the spiraling of the curriculum because
the common core does not spiral
it's really critical for students to not
skip standards which is what our past
practice was in this district so
students had severe gaps and what we saw
and what our data told us is that
students were not completing
advanced math in their senior year even
if they were accelerated to middle
school
46 percent of them by 12th grade were
not taking advanced math courses anymore
which is concerning because we know when
they don't take a math course in 12th
grade what that means um so back to
compacted so students in a compacted
seventh and eighth grade course cover
three full years of standards
in two years so they cover all of the
seventh grade standards all of the
eighth grade standards all of the
algebra standards they earn they can
earn high school credit for algebra
and then move on into high school
which is where we offer our other
opportunities for acceleration in
mathematics
so i'm going to ask that we thank you
very much for that but i am asked that
we move on do we have other questions or
comments about this presentation
that's all right
mina did you have anything um i guess
the only thing was looking at these um
graphs that you guys had where you would
split students into different classrooms
just think about who would be in these
different parts of the graphs and just
looking at like equity in that way who
exactly is represented in the middle
graph and who's on the outside graphs
and just yeah that's like my only
concern i had looking at this
okay um director buell we have i think
we need to move on because speedchest
tonight
pardon
speed chest tonight
um no it's quarter to ten and i'd like
to make sure that we have sufficient
time to cover our third and final
uh you had a follow-up question about
that maybe you could do that by email
i'd also like to have a make a comment
okay but i'm i really
really
take umbrage to the fact that i have a
question that i can't ask to a
presentation that they bring forward on
it's something like
just ask it very quickly and then we can
wrap up i'll just go ahead okay we've
already made your initiative
okay great
great thank you
great
i just i just offered you if you wanted
to ask it okay
one kid was accelerated that was what
you had said mark that's what we know of
one kid in the whole school system yep
in all of portland public schools new
acceleration was what one new
acceleration where they hadn't been
accelerated in previous this last just
last year this last year's current year
and connect i would add to that that
that must be single subject acceleration
because the compacted math pathway is a
form of acceleration okay absolutely
yeah right
what about was that was it literacy you
were talking about
reading i believe it was in math but i
don't i don't know previous to the
seventh acceleration from the seventh to
the eighth grade
there was only one that was okay
thank you as far as we know just
elementary but i think it's also an
issue of nobody is keeping really
records of this so i'm not sure how
accurate even this one is we've been
told they just don't know yeah i would
actually like to speak to that and to
second what mark said uh in following up
on that data
the teacher who had provided that
information
simply had had her hands on a single
student and that was her reference point
is the single student she had herself
worked with
when we look to see where can we find
the data around single subject
acceleration what we discovered is we
are not housing that centrally and we
need to start to start keeping that
centrally so can you just send an email
out to every principal and have them
send back how many kids were accelerated
this year in your mouth in your school
and math i mean they'd take about what
they'd have to walk down and ask
somebody or ask oh they'd have to ask
questions at the faculty meeting
couldn't we just do it that way and find
out
there are many ways we can do that so i
think i'm just going to wrap up and say
that i would appreciate thank you very
much for your presentation um i think i
think we heard some of sort of the
02h 40m 00s
crosswalk melissa from what you're doing
to the tag recommendations but i think
for me it'd be helpful maybe in a
written follow-up just to make sure
we're what your response is to each one
of them specifically so we can know
where you are it sounds like you are
doing some
some maybe you have a different view of
how to go about them so for me it would
be helpful just to kind of have that
follow-up i'd appreciate that very much
um so that things like what is our poli
when are we going to do that policy
review so that we are clear across the
district and we are coming back to you
in the fall for a staff report around
talented and gifted the focus for
tonight was really to make sure that the
tag act recommendations great
uh so dr so she has one
quick question and that has to do
with because we're considering all this
uh i'm assuming there are some budget
ramifications and some of these
suggestions and we're going to see
something along that line
the budget issues here well i think
we've tried not to suggest anything that
clearly
uh costs
you know that cost large huge amounts of
money but you know we are asking that
for example
uh all schools are able to support one
grade acceleration above their maximum
grade
and clearly that's that's not free
but we're hoping that
that could be done with the itinerant
teachers or
uh
right you know additional
help by teachers there i was i was
looking more at
the potential for a lot of professional
development for our teachers to do some
of this
work
yeah that's what i was looking for
you'll see budget issues around the elsi
budget uh issues coming forth with the
super attendance great thank you very
much thank you very much thank you thank
you
guys
so i'm not calling a recess but i do
suggest we have a seventh inning stretch
so we can give this next topic it's due
with a little more energy let's do a
stand up and stretch
yeah
is that what it was called go noodle
so we have one more important topic on
our agenda tonight and that is an update
on our equity implementation plan
it's important but it's not an
informational update
all right
so can the equity team come on down yeah
that was just a quick stretch
so
with our revitalized blood flow here and
energy
we are very pleased to
have as our final major topic tonight an
update on our equity implementation plan
um
this topic is listed on the board's
priority work plan
for semi-annual updates to the board and
this is our second update this year so
we're really pleased to see you back
superintendent smith would you like to
introduce the item
and can folks out in the hallway please
keep your voices down so we can move on
to the next topic thank you so much
yes as uh
as chair atkins just described this is
our semi-annual update and lolenzo poe
who is our chief equity and diversity
officer and director of partnerships uh
and janine fukuda who is assistant
director of the same department
will be presenting our report this
evening
thank you good evening uh lolenzo po
chief equity and diversity officer and
director partnerships
board member superintendent smith let me
do two things uh one and the spirits are
helping all of us catch up on time and
have a significant amount of time for
questions and answers because that seems
to be really critical
and because part of our presentation
that we have a teacher and we wanted to
make sure that we had enough time for
her to be a part of presentation and get
out to get back home to get rest to be
in class tomorrow so
let me do this quickly and say that this
is the update of our annual ratio equity
plan
it is the plan that contains the
critical strategies the metrics and the
accountability models by which we're
looking at how we're in fact moving and
progressing with uh implementation of
your racial equity plan
we also want to spend a few minutes
tonight to talk about the key
performance indicators
those are the high level indicators and
strategies that we have identified that
will serve as that flash point for us to
see
from a large a high level as if we're
moving toward the direction of closing
the gap as we've described in it
and lastly we want to bring before you
02h 45m 00s
the collaborative action research for
equity group our cares model and allow
them to talk to you about in some detail
in the briefing about what we're doing
and cares work because one of the things
that i'm constantly asked is how are we
moving the work into the classroom where
is this work touching teachers and
impacting their work and it is through
the cares model so we did want to make
sure we give them opportunity to brief
you and you become familiar with that
so with that let me turn it over to
janine and let her walk you through our
equity plan our key performance
indicators and then we'll bring up our
cares team thank you thanks
good evening um janine
assistant director in the office of
equity and partnerships
as superintendent smith mentioned in
june 2011 we passed our racial
educational equity policy
this policy directs the superintendent
to develop annual equity plans with
clear accountability and metrics and to
provide semi-annual updates to the board
i'm going to briefly just go over the
information in your packets before
turning it over to my colleagues
in your packet you will find two planned
documents the first is the 2013-2014
annual equity plan year and progress
report which summarizes some of the
district's key equity goals for the year
and our progress towards those goals
also in your packet is the
2014-2015 that's this school year
annual equity plan which documents key
equity work that's currently underway
you will notice that this year's equity
plan
includes a focus on the superintendent's
three priorities so we are in the
process of integrating the
superintendent's three priority work
along with our male of color pledge work
into the equity plan and so in future
iterations you'll start to see that
integration
more clearly
also in your packets are equity key
performance indicators or kpis
while our milestones are the ultimate
measure of success of our equity work
the kpis measure system level progress
towards closing racial opportunity gaps
which contribute to disparities in
student achievement
and thank you melissa goffer earlier in
the evening sort of walking us through
what those how those kpis are calculated
so you'll see that the kpis are
generally trending in a positive
direction i just wanted to point out
some key highlights
the october 2014 special education data
is still being compiled however
preliminarily preliminary results
indicate that the overall number of
black students who qualify for special
education services dropped from
1043 to 975 this year
black students who qualify under
emotional disturbance decreased in
number from 120 to 111
and black students who qualify under
intellectual disability decreased in
number from 56 to 48.
with our apib dual credit kpi
in 2013-14
year-over-year there was a 40 increase
in the number of black students enrolled
in ap ib or dual credit courses where 98
more black students were enrolled
what percentage i'm sorry 40 4-0 40
increase year over year
sorry i don't have slides but i can
keep going you're doing great
for hispanic latino students there was a
17 increase with 71 more students
enrolled and for our native american
alaskan native students there was an
increase of 13 with four more students
enrolled
this was due to intentional outreach
efforts and an expansion of the academic
scholars program at franklin to
roosevelt
our teacher diversity numbers continue
to improve as well for the 2014-15
school year of the 501 new teachers
hired 21 were teachers of color
over the past five years the percentage
of teachers of color in the district has
increased from 13 to 18
so we will not be walking through all of
the documents that are in your packet
tonight the equity work has become
embedded in all the work that we do and
so a lot of the work in the plan should
be familiar to you and you'll be seeing
more of it in all of the presentations
that come forward
for example tonight you heard about the
tag work and the high school graduation
work next week we'll be doing a much
deeper dive on the exclusionary
discipline work
with that quick overview
i'm going to hand this over to our
colleagues who are going to now talk
about the care work and we'll take
questions at the end great just just a
quick point of clarification the data
are in the board packet that's been
posted online so folks want to see the
data you've been referencing it's online
yes in the packet for tonight's meeting
great thank you
and it should there should be paper
classes up there as well
sorry for the interruption
02h 50m 00s
good evening
good evening directors good evening good
evening my name is regina zackrider and
i'm program director for equity care
and my name is cynthia mccloud and i'm
the assistant director of equity
professional development
and tonight we're going to talk about
care which is the instructional
component
of the district's equity work and care
stands for collaborative action research
for equity
and before we begin our presentation
what we'd like to do is introduce misty
koenig who is a teacher from madison
high school and she's going to talk
about how the care process has impacted
her work as a teacher and
for students of color in her classroom
thank you
hi hi
my name is misty koenig and i work at
madison high school so this is my fifth
year of teaching at madison high school
and my second year being a member of the
care team in that time i have been at
madison i've taken part in multiple
forms of professional development and i
believe that
care has been the most important one in
tackling the issues of closing the
achievement gap with students of color i
can honestly say that care has opened my
eyes when it comes to my daily lesson
plans i look at my classes and my
students specifically my students of
color with a very different lens
most of the time lesson planning
involves thinking strictly about content
and very rarely do we think about a
student's perspective
when we plan and through my work with
care i've learned to create lessons for
my students instead of fitting my
students into the lessons that i've
already created
and what i've discovered is that when i
focus on one or two students of color
and their specific needs the end result
benefits the entire class had it not
been for my work through this program i
never would have looked at creating
lessons through this specific lens of
diversity
care has also given me the opportunity
to collaborate with a small group of
colleagues in regards to students of
color and their learning and within that
group we tackle issues that all of us
have but don't know how to necessarily
deal with
we focus on what we as teachers need to
change in order to really help our
students of color instead of thinking
about how our students need to change to
fit into our model that we already have
while this has been extremely
challenging at times it has been
something that has altered my way of
thinking as an educator
too often we focus on the external
issues within our classrooms rather than
turning the mirror inward
through care i've been challenged to do
this often
i am challenged to look at myself to
look at my planning to look at all
things that i might have dismissed
before
all with the hopes of benefiting the
students within my classroom
additionally i'm able to observe and be
observed by other teachers
and get intentional feedback on engaging
and interacting with students of color
without care i know i wouldn't be making
changes to better my practice like i am
now simply because i wouldn't have the
voices and the eyes in my classroom
pushing me to do so
um
which is such a rare commodity in our
profession right now i'm not sure what
other districts have teachers observing
each other for the sole purpose of
equity and i feel privileged to be uh
given that opportunity to do so and
finally if we're i think if we're ever
going to be able to manage this issue of
equity within our schools we have to be
intentional with our actions we have to
back up our desire to tackle this topic
with our solid with solid professional
development we can't just simply
say we want to change and not implement
anything that's going to promote that
change
and care is an integral part of closing
the achievement gap and i'm honored to
be a part of it and i only hope i can
continue to grow as a professional by
being pushed in ways that wouldn't have
happened had it not been for this
program
thank you so much thank you
do you have it do you have any questions
at this time okay board members for
misti
wants to go home
yeah misty has to go to school earlier
what subject what subject did you say i
teach math geometry specifically yeah
well thank you so great to have you here
your comments so director bellow
first i just want to say if you haven't
seen the madison video
go check it out go mad
because it's awesome
and thank you for being here and i
appreciate
one of my colleagues often categorizes
teachers into three buckets
and i won't go into those three buckets
but
02h 55m 00s
they're
quite commonly in many professions there
are certain people who are really
interested in
and have the capacity to take critical
feedback and improve their profession
and there are other folks who take it as
a criticism and they shy away from that
so can you talk about especially in a
profession that has traditionally been
the expert in the room
can you talk a little bit about what
you're doing at madison to to open up to
because it's scary having somebody else
come in and give you critical feedback
saying you're not doing this or you are
doing this
you might be more receptive to it but
i'm sure that we have some folks who
maybe aren't as receptive or open to
that so can you talk about
one how do you set that tone and then
two and i don't know if it's you crew or
if it's through our
other other academic staff how do we
follow up with with teachers who aren't
making the progress that we need them to
to connect with all their students
sure
first i think that
the most important thing is getting
teachers who are willing and wanting to
be a part of this work to be a part of
it and not pushing everyone to be a part
of it when you're not ready because then
you get that defensive
attitude if you will um and it's it's
very hard to take that that criticism
and that critique so one you have to be
willing i think two you have to be a
part of a program that's really going to
wrap around you and work with you and i
think that's one of the wonderful things
about care
and then the professional development
that comes
with it
trainings that we you know are a part of
i went to new orleans with a training
that they encouraged me to go to with
beyond diversity and um and it was
fantastic and i came back just
supercharged and
then when i talked about it and we were
allowed to bring two more people on
they were
you know the people were like oh my gosh
i want to be a part of that because it's
um it exudes out of you when when you
have the professional development that
is wonderful and i mean there are plenty
of stories we can give you about
professional development that is not
wonderful so um when you're a part of a
program
that is so dedicated and so excited
about it it's easy to also become
excited and then because the group is so
small to start
you feel very comfortable and willing to
accept the critique and it's a very
vulnerable situation to be in
but because it's so small and because
everybody is with you wanting to be
there it just seems like the place to be
and you're willing to accept it because
you want to and you know it's important
rather than being forced into it
did that answer your question
you did okay and maybe when the other
folks answer the second part of that
question they can talk about we don't
always have the luxury to say well if
you want to connect with all your kids
go ahead and if you don't well you're
just not ready like we have to move our
system to connect with all kids so
how do we do how do we move that right
that actually is is a part of our
presentation where we're going to talk
about the protocols that we use around
the care work so okay we'll just tuck
that in there
thank you so much um it's wonderful to
be here this you need to not maybe not
this late but it is wonderful
we're hanging in there too to talk about
uh something that has
uh brought some as misty was talking
about some wonderful progress to our
schools
let's see let's take a look
the first slide you see is is an overall
structure for that courageous
conversations about race that is in it
that is a part of each of our schools
the equity team forms the foundation for
both the care and the past work the
equity team
all the schools now have equity teams
and that's where the professional
development around deepening their
racial consciousness occurs
the care team
and care is the classroom part of this
work and so the there's the professional
growth part and the personal growth part
but then the next step
moves it into the classroom which is
what care does and then the final of
those three parts of the courageous
conversations about race has to do with
past which is partnerships for
academically successful students and
that's the parent piece of it
so i'd like to talk a little bit more
about
the care process
and what it's about
so care is a piece of our equity
transformation process that we have here
at the district
so if you'll see the words up there in
bold
they really encompass the cycle of
03h 00m 00s
inquiry and that's a collaborative
classroom level
action
equity in action
so first off we have discover
and what discovering looks like is
teachers ask themselves how am i
connecting to my students of color
through what i teach and how i teach
part of that process is asking teachers
to identify a focal student of color
and really getting to know that student
and we call that
above and below the line information so
above the line information would be
information that you would get from
synergy from the student information
system
from a file
below the line information would be that
information that you might receive
from talking to the student talking from
family members getting to know who that
student is
where they come from what their culture
looks like their language etc
so that's really important to get you
know
important piece of getting to know who
your student is
then we look at documenting
developing and delivering and what this
looks like is is
really what misty talked about and that
is planning and delivering a lesson
with your focal student in mind
the last piece is disseminating
and disseminating is about the
all-important observation process and
i'm going to talk more about that later
where students where teachers receive
feedback
and then they consider and integrate
that feedback into the next lesson that
they'll teach with their focal student
in mind and then the cycle begins again
okay now i'd like to talk about the four
r's
which is a cornerstone of the care work
so the first are rigor
and rigor is really having high
expectations for all of your students
realness realness is about knowing who
you are what your culture is and
knowing about your culture and your race
and when i say knowing who you are and
knowing who you are as a teacher
and knowing who you are and what you
bring to the classroom in terms of your
culture and race
it's important that teachers bring their
real selves to the classroom in order
for the classroom to be welcoming and
comfortable for students of color to
bring their real selves
relevance
asking yourself is the content of what
i'm teaching and the style of my
instruction meaningful and engaging for
my students of color so i'll give you an
example
a traditional classroom where students
are sitting quietly everyone's well
behaved and they're raising their hands
when they have a question that works for
some of our students
for us some for some of our students
a model where there may be some call and
response
where there are
opportunities
for
shout outs
that can also be an engaged well-behaved
classroom
so it's really looking at
is the content and how i'm teaching
meeting the needs of my students
all of my students
and then we look at relationship
and relationship is about authentic
connections between teachers and
students
so knowing what our students need
for and relationships look different for
different students it may be
a hello when a student walks
into your classroom it may be
intentionally checking in with the
student once they've sat down at their
desk just checking in how's your morning
been
do you have the supplies that you need
you're ready to go
so it's all about knowing what that
student need as needs and meeting them
where they're at
so
so what does care look like in our
schools currently well as you can see we
have
our schools are in a variety of places
in
2015-16 we will have 35 schools that
will implement care school-wide and then
in the year 2016-17
all our schools will implement or be in
the process of implementing care
school-wide
and the the staggering occurs because
our schools entered the courageous
conversations about race in a staggered
manner and so that's that's why that is
happening
one of the most important parts of the
care work of course is the teacher and
the principal's selection of teachers
for the for beginning the care work in
their school is integral to its success
principals select teacher leaders who
are open to learning about culturally
relevant teaching
they select teachers who are reflective
03h 05m 00s
practitioners and they also select
teachers that are cross-section of the
teachers in their building
there are three major themes in the care
work the first theme
or purpose for the seminar work that our
teachers do is to build cultural and
racial proficiency a second theme in our
professional development for our care
teachers is how to use action research
to improve their instruction
instructional practice and the third
theme that is in our care seminar
professional development work is that it
focuses on culturally relevant and
responsive instruction
so i'd like to talk a little bit about
the professional development model
so teachers will receive
care teachers will receive training
from developed and facilitated by our
team of six
equity ptosis or teachers on special
assignment
so what the care team looks like is
there are two to four teachers
and a building administrator
with the goal of that care team
bringing the care work school-wide
i also want to emphasize the importance
of administrator
involvement and
having been a care teacher myself i know
how important it is to have the support
of my administrator
i can be enthusiastic i can engage my
students of color
and it will be meaningful to my work
into my students work
with administrator support
that's really
meaningful in terms of bringing the work
school wide
so what we have is we have four seminar
modules over two years and the seminars
are day-long seminars
and
after we have our first seminar
then we'll do a half day visit or we'll
conduct a half day visit
with the care team
and during that half day visit
the ptosis and the care teams will
discuss
what was discussed
during the seminar for clarification and
for anchoring their learning
then they will have
a meeting where they will
have site observations and classroom
observations and i'll talk about more
about that in the next slide
so now we're looking at the protocol for
the care observation
and this is so important to the process
because as misty said
earlier it's about being vulnerable
it's about examining your practice and
it's about going deeper in the racial
equity work
and in your practice
so the first thing we do is we have
pre-observation and the pre-observation
during that time we ground ourselves
using
the protocols
and really talk about how we are going
to be fully present as we know
it's it's not always easy as a teacher
to be fully present because you have
50 things going on at once
so it's this is a really important step
in order for teachers to feel present
and ready to go with observation process
then the teachers will share
information about their focal students
and what they would like
what questions they have about their
lesson or what engagement looks like for
their focal student
and any wonderings that they have
at that point the team then visits
each teacher's classroom who's going to
be observed for 20 minutes so that
teacher teaches a lesson
their peers observe and during that time
they take notes thinking about
you know what they're seeing and what
they're seeing and what it makes them
wonder
and they spend about 20 minutes in each
classroom
then we have the all-important post
observation
debrief
once again
grounding is so important
and really honoring
the fact that teachers are in a place
and they need to be in a place of
disequilibrium and what that what that
looks like is that teachers are thinking
about reflecting on and questioning
their instructional practices
during that time the teacher who's been
observed will talk about how the lesson
went regarding their focal student
03h 10m 00s
after they've talked about
the lesson then the observe the teachers
who are observing
will share their feedback in terms of
what they saw and what it made them
wonder and this is the time when they
have the opportunity to affirm and
challenge
and then after that there's that there's
a process of dialogue and that is the
teacher who has been observed
really shares what resonated most with
them
from the feedback that they received
and the final slide um shows our team
the tosa team and the three
names that have an asterisk behind them
are new members to our team and the
additional of the addition of the uh the
addition of the staff for this year made
it possible for us to move the care work
district wide and so that was that was a
real that was a huge uh move forward for
both the work in the district as well as
for our team
and then of course regina also was new
to our team and her focus now is totally
on the care work so that i can do both i
can be a part of that but i can also
work with our our principals and in
their buildings so that ends our
presentation thank you thank you thank
you so much for that deep dive into this
piece as well as for the previous
overall update so board members
questions or comments either about the
care piece or the overall equity
implementation update i'm going to look
at this direction
i just had a curtain i have a couple of
questions
um
uh first of all i i guess for is it is
it misty is that right whoops don't
escape
you're the star oh you should've left
when you had the chance
um
it's always best to hear from the
teachers
so um tell me about the focus student
how do you pick that focused student and
is it just one student you have or
um
and you
ask the student if
you can use them as a focus or just how
does that all work
so
generally um no i do not ask them
um
they love to be the focal student
because they're the focal you know focus
of all the time so they know they're the
focal student um
sometimes like generally i like last
year it was our first year at care
or being a member of care and so um
i did not tell my focal students that
they were focal students
um i had a lot of conversations with
them but they didn't really
no no just i just let that go
but this year i have said hey you're my
focal student and of course
the world revolves around them at 15. so
they love that
but the way i pick them is generally
they they're students of color and
they're students that
i feel
need some more attention or i feel i'm
not serving them well and so
if i'm not serving them well
something is missing and so i need to
figure out what i need to do to
better serve them so it's not
necessarily oh i have this behavior
child it's i'm not connecting well with
this student or i'm not doing everything
that i need to do to
help them succeed and so that's those
one or two students are going to be my
focal students
and so you've been in this program for
two years correct so what what's the
difference you're seeing not only in
yourself you kind of talked a little bit
about that but what kind of a difference
is it making in your classroom with your
students
the difference is phenomenal um i it's
hard for me to even describe how
impactful it's been um
because
it's it's so subtle uh yet so huge and
so for me i feel like because i'm um
specifically focusing on certain
students and creating lessons
as much as i can
around them
they don't even realize that they're
engaging more
but then they walk out and there and
like today for instance uh one of my
students who's my focal student walked
out and he was saying as he walked out
man that was a lesson just for me and i
was like yes he was
yes it was but he doesn't you know he
didn't necessarily know that i'm
thinking at night like how can i get him
to you know to be engaged what does he
need um so it's little things like that
that they just walk out and you know
man i totally had you all day today and
or for that 94 minutes of time and that
was wonderful um and and the
academic you know like it shows in their
assessments as well so when i have them
03h 15m 00s
in class and i'm doing what i need to do
for them
um
it shows up when when i give them any
sort of assessment um and and i think
what's most important is that it just
doesn't show up for my students
for my focal students it shows up across
the board because those little things
that i'm doing for you know those two
students are what 18 other students need
as well
it's just i'm just highlighting those
those two that i'm focusing on
thank you okay
anything else
director morton thank you
um and thank you for the presentation
and everything i think the the
information that we were provided is is
pretty comprehensive i think it's the
equity work across the district is
probably some of the
uh if not the most important work that
we can be doing right now particularly
given
again the
indicators like graduation rates
achievement gaps things like that that
we see that that continue to be
in need of work
uh i think the the
the care
care in schools
is is also really important um i think
what's also important in addition to
that is
improving our process and increasing our
hiring for teachers of color
we have the minority teacher act which
although the legislature went past
passing this
10 plus years ago didn't give it any
teeth
actually i created some targets that i
think our district needs to be
needs to be moving towards at the very
least we should be
we should have a teacher workforce and
an administrative work administrative
workforce that reflects the students in
our classrooms so i know that's not
necessarily all of your jobs but it is
certainly
all of our responsibility and and
finding and bringing successful teachers
of color and administrators of color
into our district
um
so a couple of just real quick things on
top of that one is the
uh the selection criteria and
um
the first three items i can't imagine a
teacher of quality
that wouldn't
fit any of these
so
and to reiterate it's open to an
interest in equity anti-racism work in
the school
open to learning how to use culturally
relevant teaching practices to improve
achievement of students of color
and willing to share what they have
learned with their colleagues so i'm
interested because i'm certain once
these are asked every teacher in our
building is raising their hand saying i
fit this and i want to
i want to be a part of this how do we
how do we choose them across schools
specifically or are there are there
other i would imagine there are other
criteria i would hope there are actually
there are other criteria but we just
summarized it to these main four
okay
so
i don't know i mean if you if you had
other i'd be willing to hear it if you'd
if if i had other criteria criteria
right uh for example um uh teachers who
have had show or who have shown some
success with students of color might be
a teacher that would be interested in
becoming being a part of the care team
and the care team is just the very
beginning of the work and that starts
with the two or four teachers that come
to the initial training but then those
teachers
the following year then work with other
teachers at their grade level in their
school to to broaden that scope so while
they may start out with just the two
they very quickly move
out of that two and that two becomes
four or six or 10. okay
so
the uh
you laid out some of the professional
development model the seminars i'm
curious about who is
who or the the content experts in these
seminars who's presenting them
the content experts would be our six
equity caretosas okay
okay they develop and facilitate so they
have complete ownership
and they are the experts okay
and they are the peers
of our teachers i think that's very
important to note so the um
and i guess experts based on what
criteria because i can i can look at so
whatever is our national award winner i
can look at our graduation rates
particularly across our communities of
color and say no one should be calling
themselves an expert
i think part of what it is matt is also
that you have within the context of
cares and around courageous conversation
03h 20m 00s
that expertise doesn't preclude the
availability to bring other expertise
into our schools this is a part of that
strategy but it's not the whole of the
strategy who's in the school who
supports it working our community
partners about doing
curriculum that brings it into the
classroom so it is multifaceted so this
is one slice of it because until unless
we close gaps all across this country i
submit no one's really an expert i agree
with you but how do you keep moving how
you look at it and bring all the
resources that we can is really how we
believe we are okay close together i
appreciate that and and when i um use
the word expert i'm an expert about the
care process
and i think i use the vertex
when they're disseminating the
information about care and training
teachers about care yeah thank you for
the clarification and i sure and i think
i um
i ask these questions not because i i
feel like this is a
something that should not be happening
but i think we need to continue to
uh question our assumptions about the
quality of education that we're
providing absolutely
not for any other reason then again when
we see the evidence the evidence
demonstrates something very different
than maybe what we think is happening so
um and i think that continuous
improvement asking those questions is a
part of that continuous improvement so i
appreciate those questions continuing to
be asked i do want to add one thing you
brought up the issue of the minority
teachers act and
not to preempt when we come back to talk
about affirmative action and those kind
of things but as we look preliminary at
our data the state has set a 10
goal for 2015
we have exceeded that goal so just to
give you a preemption that we've
exceeded it nowhere close to where we're
going to be and you know hr and all of
us are working very hard to identify
recruit grow our workforce but we are on
a a project treaty that is rather
relatively encouraging at this moment
and i appreciate you bringing that up
and hopefully we're setting a we're
setting an expectation on this board
that that's that's the trajectory that
we want
other folks
director
so my understanding is what we're trying
to do is to
teach
our teachers to do a better job with all
their children
regardless of their backgrounds is that
a summary of what we're trying to do
here
the care that's that's the that's what
specifically you're that we're trying to
do this is which is great which is it's
nice for getting to that i really
appreciate it uh
i
the uh
there's a couple other things that and
it has not really to do with this it has
to do with the whole equity program
because i think we it's great that we're
teaching
our teachers how to deal with
children in their class or how to teach
better with all their children
but
we're we're awful short in some areas
it seems to me
that
we shouldn't be short in
reading teachers to teach children to
read
librarians to
get them going
uh counselors to work with them
i would think that would be should be
part of our equity plan and i don't see
it in these equity plan things
at all i don't see that and for me
that's a major part of our equity plan
i just like to make that it should be
should be
teaching children to read we're really
talking about equitable education to a
huge degree for all children
regardless of where they come from or
where they come from period their
different
backgrounds or approaches or whatever
that is whatever that represents what
we're trying to do is get
an educational equity and for us to do
that i think we've got to start sticking
some resources into the classrooms
some places that we're not and one is
teaching everybody to read
the second thing is
i have not seen yet and i don't i
haven't been
investigating what we're really doing
around the curriculum particularly in
the lower grades so we have culturally
relevant curriculum
particularly in history and those and
similar
type subjects and i haven't seen that
i think if we're going to really say
okay we're doing an equity program those
are two things that we really need to
look at and begin work on both those
things in my opinion uh the third the
third question i had is more of a
personal one people who know me would
know there's a lot of stuff out there
about how racist the common core is
that it's really not
a system
03h 25m 00s
that is without bias
are we looking at that and saying hmm
i wonder how we can if we're going to do
all this common core stuff are we going
to
look at the
bias have we looked at that i mean is
anybody in our district saying
oh maybe this is i mean what is it how
can we make adjustments so we don't get
caught up in those particular problems
concerning the aspect testing the
testing the common core there's a lot of
i mean there's two sides to that issue i
know there's two sides to it because i
read about it all the time one side says
oh no this is great the other side says
no this is horribly inequitable and
and creates this horrible bias around
him
and we're coming down
on the side that says no this is going
to be good otherwise we might not be
doing it without the balancing of it
which we're not doing it doesn't appear
to me that we're not balancing it
but i think if we're going to really
talk about equity too we may want to
look at what we're now pushing out for
every student in our entire school
system and make sure that that doesn't
have these built-in biases that we're
not making things worse by doing that
and and guard and we need to be guarding
against that you don't have to answer
that i just wanted to make those
statements because i think they're
they really ring true to me
so there you go okay any questions
i'm gonna come back misty i just want to
say thank you for being here i know that
you're gonna be up early tomorrow and
you're gonna have um kids and i i just
want to say thank you for being willing
to show that learning is lifelong
for being one of those people that
understands that the results that are
happening in the classroom are
a direct result of the adult in front of
the classroom
not a fault of the students that show up
in the classroom so thank you for that
and
i want to say thank you to the equity
team the folks that are doing the work
cynthia i'm going to call a special
shout out to you i have consistently
heard throughout the district how much
people have felt supported by you
and how much they really appreciate your
working with them
to deal with this i'm going to return
back to
my original question about what are the
things when we have teachers
principals
who are not ready to do this work
how do we help them find that a
different place how do we provide them
the support
or what tools do we have to say thank
you but your services are no longer
needed because as director morton points
out
we're moving in the right direction but
these are unacceptable outcomes and we
don't have the time to say
well if you want that'd be great
let me do this again because often
in my role i have to
bring us back to a point
that part of my office's job
is to
coordinate
work with
discuss
provide professional development to the
district
a lot of the specific issues around
curriculum and management of personnel
and teachers
are not a part of our plan our domain
which is why when janine said part of
what you will see in here
will come to you from other
presentations
we will highlight that we will show it
to you but a lot of that comes in those
presentations now we may have an opinion
but part of that is to share with the
superintendent and the senior team about
what we think and how we see that
happening yes they are critically
important but
unfortunately unfortunately depending on
how you sit on it that is not part of
our primary job so
i just offer that as a cameo i i
appreciate that and i i wasn't asking
you necessarily or any one of you
specifically but just to drive the point
home that unless we have levers and with
um
assistant superintendent lopez in the
room
i just want to highlight that unless we
have levers to make that happen
this is a lot of
feel good talk yes absolutely
actually if i could just offer a couple
of things
one of the
very important parts of our work is to
work very closely with and this is part
of my job this worked very closely with
um
the
with antonio and with the senior senior
directors to make sure that they are are
very clear on
what
what their schools and what the
principles in their schools are doing
and also
that we're there to support both the
principal and the senior directors so we
do work i work very closely with them so
that's one of the ways that we can have
some influence or some
um some sway in that whole process of
of performance to be sure that our
principles are very clear on what
support is there for them and what is
being what is expected of of them as far
as being equity leaders in their school
and then for this the senior directors
to know that we're also our office is
03h 30m 00s
there to support the schools and the
administrators and the teachers in any
way that we can
thank you
one last comment
i doubt very much if we have teachers
out there who are principals even who
are not ready for this work i think the
way we do
some of the mistakes we made along
created some of the problem that we
underwent and it got
misaligned with some other
idea of what was causing that but that's
here now there this program goes out and
says to teachers
look
here's some things we can use to help
you with all the children in your
classroom i don't think you'll have
anywhere near
the
back push that you had for the a lot of
the other work that and the way that we
went about it and i and i think one of
the problems that we have is by pointing
those fingers and saying
we have these people that are not ready
for this work and we should be firing
them
that's not the approach that i think
makes sense the approach that makes
sense is we know you're all ready for
this work and we're going to bring you
together and we're going to and give you
this work and it's going to be so good
you're going to embrace it and i think
there's a lot of difference between how
you approach that and i think one one of
the problems that we had on our early
approach to some of this work was that
we were pointing the fingers you are the
bad guy you are the person you and all
that finger finger-pointing and a lot of
people responding negatively who taught
in our buildings for years and years and
years responded negatively to that i
don't think it was necessarily around
that they're not ready for equity work i
i think they're ready plenty ready for
it it was kind of a little bit how we
went about it and it sounds to me like
the way that we're going about it now
makes a lot of sense here's some things
you can use in your classroom because
that's what we're really about is
teaching children and so i'm real glad
to see that this is the direction that
we're going so great on that note of
unanimity and agreement that we're
headed in the right direction
um i just thank you so much thank you so
much misty for being here at the slate
hour really really really valuable to
have your direct voice from the
classroom so thank you so much thanks to
all the staff even though we didn't go
through selfie cell i know we all
reviewed this cell by cell it's
available to the public to look at
appreciate
to um appreciate all the work of the
staff and just that feeling of
cumulative momentum and um as the work
gains strength and throughout the
district so in every part of the
district so thank you so much for all of
that thank you thank you
okay so at this late hour the board will
now consider a very small uh business
agenda mrs are there any changes to the
business agenda there are not all right
do i have a motion and a second to adopt
for business agenda so move second
director knowles moves very quickly and
director blind quickly seconds the
adoption of the business agenda is there
any public comment no there is none any
more discussion
no okay the board will now vote on the
business agenda all in favor please
indicate by saying aye
any abstentions okay the business agenda
is approved by a vote of five to zero
with student representative jazwa voting
yes yes all right before i adjourn just
want to remind our parents out there if
you haven't already done so either check
your email to take the successful school
survey or if you prefer to do it by
paper you can go check at your school
and folks there will help you fill out
that survey so do please fill it out we
are looking for a very high completion
rate at every single school
so thank you for taking the successful
school survey
the next meeting of the board will be
held on tuesday february 10th and we are
Sources
- PPS Board of Education, Archive 2014-2015, https://www.pps.net/Page/1893 (accessed: 2022-03-24T00:57:53.371200Z)
- PPS Communications, "Board of Education" (YouTube playlist), https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8CC942A46270A16E (accessed: 2023-10-10T04:10:04.879786Z)